Missiology: Rise, demise and future at the university

P. Verster
{"title":"Missiology: Rise, demise and future at the university","authors":"P. Verster","doi":"10.5952/55-3-4-670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although a latecomer as discipline, missiology had an impressive rise in\n the history of theology. Gustav Warneck’s “Evangelische Missionslehre (1897-1903)” resulted in\n missiology being regarded as an extremely influential discipline. This was not at all strange as\n Christian mission was a worldwide endeavour and accepted as the most important calling of the\n church. Throughout the 1900s missiology and missiological conferences continued to be the centre\n of theological discussions. With the political emancipation of Africa and the East, the whole\n concept of missions was challenged and this led to the demise of missiology as a discipline at\n universities. Influential missiologists, such as Johannes Verkuyl and David Bosch, published\n works of high theological value, but it seemed as if sociological, cultural and interreligious\n studies displaced missiology at university. Many seminaries are still putting up a brave fight\n to save missiology, but at university level it seems that classical missiology as discipline is\n being displaced. The future of missiology must, however, not be regarded as obsolete, but rather\n as an irreplaceable part of theology and faith.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/55-3-4-670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Although a latecomer as discipline, missiology had an impressive rise in the history of theology. Gustav Warneck’s “Evangelische Missionslehre (1897-1903)” resulted in missiology being regarded as an extremely influential discipline. This was not at all strange as Christian mission was a worldwide endeavour and accepted as the most important calling of the church. Throughout the 1900s missiology and missiological conferences continued to be the centre of theological discussions. With the political emancipation of Africa and the East, the whole concept of missions was challenged and this led to the demise of missiology as a discipline at universities. Influential missiologists, such as Johannes Verkuyl and David Bosch, published works of high theological value, but it seemed as if sociological, cultural and interreligious studies displaced missiology at university. Many seminaries are still putting up a brave fight to save missiology, but at university level it seems that classical missiology as discipline is being displaced. The future of missiology must, however, not be regarded as obsolete, but rather as an irreplaceable part of theology and faith.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宣教学:大学的兴起、消亡与未来
宣教学虽然是一门后来者的学科,但在神学历史上却有令人印象深刻的崛起。古斯塔夫·沃内克(Gustav Warneck)的《Evangelische Missionslehre》(1897-1903)使宣教学被认为是一门极具影响力的学科。这一点也不奇怪,因为基督教的传教是一项世界性的努力,被认为是教会最重要的呼召。在整个1900年代,宣教学和宣教会议一直是神学讨论的中心。随着非洲和东方的政治解放,宣教的整个概念受到了挑战,这导致宣教学作为一门学科在大学里的消亡。有影响力的宣教学者,如Johannes Verkuyl和David Bosch,发表了神学价值很高的作品,但似乎社会学、文化和宗教间研究取代了大学的宣教学。许多神学院仍在勇敢地为拯救宣教学而战,但在大学层面,古典宣教学作为一门学科似乎正在被取代。然而,宣教学的未来不应被视为过时,而应被视为神学和信仰中不可替代的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power games: Using Foucault to shed light on the inherent power dynamics of intercultural Bible study groups. Discussion of a qualitative research project The rising prominence of John Owen: A research article of “The Ashgate Research Companion to John Owen’s Theology” Alle kaarte op die preek “Rise up and walk” : tracing the trajectory of the Carnegie discourse and plotting a way forward The relevance of Galatians 5:16-26 in the modern "spiritual intelligence" debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1