India @ 75: Science, Technology and Innovation Policies for Development

IF 1.7 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Science Technology and Society Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1177/09717218211047029
V. Krishna, Jean Jacque Salomon, R. Waast, Dinesh Abrol, S. Visvanathan, V. Krishna
{"title":"India @ 75: Science, Technology and Innovation Policies for Development","authors":"V. Krishna, Jean Jacque Salomon, R. Waast, Dinesh Abrol, S. Visvanathan, V. Krishna","doi":"10.1177/09717218211047029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India was perhaps the only country among the developing world with a colonial past to have organised and established national science community much before it attained its independence. Nehruvian science and technology (S&T) policy in India’s formative years left a distinct imprint in the post-colonial and post-independent India. With a huge population of nearly 1.35 billion people, India is not dependent on food on outside countries since the 1960s. Green and White Revolutions have made immense contribution to develop scientific and technical capacities in agriculture. India’s innovation system, including higher education, has given her some comparative advantage through ‘human capital’ in information technology, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, space research and so on. In export promotion and economic competitiveness in technology-based industries, we lag compared with East Asian ‘Dragons’. India’s informal sector poses a formidable challenge with more than 95% of the total labour force, about 550 million, 90% of which is 8th class dropouts. When we begin to assess our national innovation system, one feature that stands out to research observers is few islands of excellence and vast ‘hinterlands’ of underdeveloped research potential. There is clearly a gap between theory and practice of science policy in India. Our gross expenditure on research and development as a proportion of gross domestic product remained relatively stagnant and, in fact, receded from 0.8% in the 1990s to 0.7% in 2020. In this period, our neighbour, China, left us far behind in S&T for development.","PeriodicalId":45432,"journal":{"name":"Science Technology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218211047029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

India was perhaps the only country among the developing world with a colonial past to have organised and established national science community much before it attained its independence. Nehruvian science and technology (S&T) policy in India’s formative years left a distinct imprint in the post-colonial and post-independent India. With a huge population of nearly 1.35 billion people, India is not dependent on food on outside countries since the 1960s. Green and White Revolutions have made immense contribution to develop scientific and technical capacities in agriculture. India’s innovation system, including higher education, has given her some comparative advantage through ‘human capital’ in information technology, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, space research and so on. In export promotion and economic competitiveness in technology-based industries, we lag compared with East Asian ‘Dragons’. India’s informal sector poses a formidable challenge with more than 95% of the total labour force, about 550 million, 90% of which is 8th class dropouts. When we begin to assess our national innovation system, one feature that stands out to research observers is few islands of excellence and vast ‘hinterlands’ of underdeveloped research potential. There is clearly a gap between theory and practice of science policy in India. Our gross expenditure on research and development as a proportion of gross domestic product remained relatively stagnant and, in fact, receded from 0.8% in the 1990s to 0.7% in 2020. In this period, our neighbour, China, left us far behind in S&T for development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度@ 75:科学、技术和创新政策促进发展
印度可能是发展中国家中唯一一个在获得独立之前很久就组织和建立了国家科学共同体的有殖民历史的国家。印度形成时期尼赫鲁的科技政策给后殖民和后独立的印度留下了鲜明的印记。拥有近13.5亿人口的印度,自上世纪60年代以来就不再依赖外部国家的粮食。绿色革命和白色革命为农业科技能力的发展做出了巨大贡献。印度的创新体系,包括高等教育,通过信息技术、生物技术、制药、空间研究等方面的“人力资本”,赋予了印度一些比较优势。在促进出口和提高科技产业的经济竞争力方面,我们与东亚“小龙”相比落后。印度的非正规部门构成了一个巨大的挑战,占总劳动力的95%以上,约5.5亿,其中90%是八年级辍学生。当我们开始评估我们的国家创新体系时,研究观察人士注意到的一个特点是,优秀的岛屿很少,研究潜力不发达的“腹地”很大。在印度,科学政策的理论和实践之间显然存在着差距。研究与开发总支出占国内生产总值的比重仍然相对停滞,实际上从上世纪90年代的0.8%下降到2020年的0.7%。在这一时期,我们的邻国中国在科技促进发展方面远远落后于我们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Science, Technology and Society is an international journal devoted to the study of science and technology in social context. It focuses on the way in which advances in science and technology influence society and vice versa. It is a peer-reviewed journal that takes an interdisciplinary perspective, encouraging analyses whose approaches are drawn from a variety of disciplines such as history, sociology, philosophy, economics, political science and international relations, science policy involving innovation, foresight studies involving science and technology, technology management, environmental studies, energy studies and gender studies. The journal consciously endeavors to combine scholarly perspectives relevant to academic research and policy issues relating to development. Besides research articles the journal encourages research-based country reports, commentaries and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Green Innovation Strategies on Firm Internal Operations: Evidence from Human Capital Structure Adjustment A Network Analysis of the Relationship Between Automation and Job Characteristics Innovative Pathways to Social Transformation: Disruptive Maintenance Through Social Impact Start-ups in Kerala Productivity of the Korean Biopharmaceutical Industry: Exploring the Effect of Business Model and Open Innovation Firms for Sustainable Manufacturing: Understanding the Key Determinants of Pro-environmental Behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1