Measure the Relative Efficiency of a Four-Stage Production Process with NDEA

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE International Journal of Biometrics Pub Date : 2020-09-16 DOI:10.5539/IJBM.V15N10P35
C. Pinto
{"title":"Measure the Relative Efficiency of a Four-Stage Production Process with NDEA","authors":"C. Pinto","doi":"10.5539/IJBM.V15N10P35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The measurement of the relative efficiency of a production process with the DEA approach considers the process itself as a \"black box\" that uses inputs to produce outputs. In reality, many production processes require the carrying out of many activities grouped into phases and interconnected with each other. For this reason, modeling a production process as a network system in which its sub-parts are differently interconnected certainly represents a modeling closer to reality. The NDEA approach born within the DEA methodology has developed several models to measure the relative efficiency of network systems such as independent models, or connected models or relational models. The latter differs from the other two in that it allows you to measure the relative efficiency of the entire process and its parts once the operations between the parts of the system have been considered. In this paper, as well as modeling a production process with four stages with shared variables, we propose a relational NDEA model under different preference systems in the distribution of resources between sub-processes to measure their relative efficiency. The proposed NDEA model is in the multiplicative version. We will use non-real data to solve the model. Our conclusions are that 1) a four-stage production process can represent numerous real processes, 2) the proposed NDEA model can therefore be used for multiple different applications and 3) the system of preferences on the distribution of resources among subs processes influences the measurement of relative efficiency both for the whole process and for its sub-processes.","PeriodicalId":54064,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biometrics","volume":"61 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/IJBM.V15N10P35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The measurement of the relative efficiency of a production process with the DEA approach considers the process itself as a "black box" that uses inputs to produce outputs. In reality, many production processes require the carrying out of many activities grouped into phases and interconnected with each other. For this reason, modeling a production process as a network system in which its sub-parts are differently interconnected certainly represents a modeling closer to reality. The NDEA approach born within the DEA methodology has developed several models to measure the relative efficiency of network systems such as independent models, or connected models or relational models. The latter differs from the other two in that it allows you to measure the relative efficiency of the entire process and its parts once the operations between the parts of the system have been considered. In this paper, as well as modeling a production process with four stages with shared variables, we propose a relational NDEA model under different preference systems in the distribution of resources between sub-processes to measure their relative efficiency. The proposed NDEA model is in the multiplicative version. We will use non-real data to solve the model. Our conclusions are that 1) a four-stage production process can represent numerous real processes, 2) the proposed NDEA model can therefore be used for multiple different applications and 3) the system of preferences on the distribution of resources among subs processes influences the measurement of relative efficiency both for the whole process and for its sub-processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用NDEA测量四阶段生产过程的相对效率
用DEA方法衡量生产过程的相对效率时,将生产过程本身视为一个使用投入产生产出的“黑箱”。在现实中,许多生产过程需要进行许多活动,这些活动分为不同的阶段,并相互联系。由于这个原因,将生产过程建模为一个网络系统,其中其子部分以不同的方式相互连接,当然代表了更接近现实的建模。在DEA方法论中诞生的NDEA方法已经开发了几个模型来衡量网络系统的相对效率,如独立模型、连接模型或关系模型。后者与其他两种方法的不同之处在于,一旦考虑了系统各部分之间的操作,它允许您度量整个流程及其各部分的相对效率。本文在对具有共享变量的四阶段生产过程进行建模的基础上,提出了不同偏好系统下子过程资源分配的关系NDEA模型,以衡量子过程的相对效率。提出的NDEA模型是乘法模型。我们将使用非真实数据来求解模型。我们的结论是1)一个四阶段的生产过程可以代表许多实际的过程,2)提出的NDEA模型因此可以用于多种不同的应用,3)子过程之间资源分配的偏好系统影响整个过程及其子过程的相对效率的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Biometrics
International Journal of Biometrics COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Biometrics and human biometric characteristics form the basis of research in biological measuring techniques for the purpose of people identification and recognition. IJBM addresses the fundamental areas in computer science that deal with biological measurements. It covers both the theoretical and practical aspects of human identification and verification.
期刊最新文献
A Secure Finger vein Recognition System using WS-Progressive GAN and C4 Classifier Exemplar-Based Facial Attribute Manipulation: A Review Arabic Offline writer identification on a new version of AHTID/MW database Recent trends and challenges in human computer interaction using automatic emotion recognition: a review Iris Recognition System Using Deep Learning Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1