A case study on a flexible floor plan design for South Korean apartments using two types of margins

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 0 ARCHITECTURE Open House International Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1108/ohi-10-2021-0227
C. Yoon, Marie Kim, Jinho Park, J. Lee
{"title":"A case study on a flexible floor plan design for South Korean apartments using two types of margins","authors":"C. Yoon, Marie Kim, Jinho Park, J. Lee","doi":"10.1108/ohi-10-2021-0227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purposes of this study are to prove that the content of floor flexibility can be designed objectively with the use of margins, which are an architectural vocabulary visualizing the possibility of formal change, and to conduct a case study on how the existing typical floor plans of South Korean apartments change with the extension of flexibility: the usability of margins and the results.Design/methodology/approachThis study reviews two housing projects with different methods of flexible housing design: one is the flexibility to change the sizes of spaces and the other is the flexibility to change the topology of spaces. In this paper, the architectural term “area margin” is used for the former and “linear margin” for the latter. These were applied to the case of current apartments in South Korea to transform them into floor plans with the two types of flexibility and investigated whether the proposed floor plans satisfy the required efficacy structurally and functionally.Findings This case study shows that margins can be used as architectural vocabularies representing flexible sizes of rooms and flexible boundaries with neighbors. The final form of the structural framework became homogeneous, even though it conserved its indigenous spatial characteristics of abundant natural sunlight and airflow. In addition, the transformed structural framework has higher rigidity than the original one, even though the transversal wall was cut off with a margin, as shown by the schematic representations in this paper. Research limitations/implicationsThe alternative plan, designed as a modification process, is not representative as a flexible floor plan. Rather, it is thought more important to make a range of variations rather than prototyping a model. This study starts from the premise that it is desirable for apartment house plans to share and encourage variations rather than aiming at typical sizes and shapes. Furthermore, this study exemplified the process to modify the existing typical floor plan into a flexible one using margins. Through this modification, it is thought that the typology of the South Korean apartment, which has succeeded in gaining social consensus for half a century, can be preserved while accommodating social changes in the future.Social implicationsThe control of future variations of floor plans will extend the socioeconomic and physical life of a building, enabling a reasonable reinvestment of resources.Originality/valueThis paper deals with a design method applying distinct visual symbols to different contexts of flexibility and using those as architectural vocabularies.","PeriodicalId":44969,"journal":{"name":"Open House International","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open House International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-10-2021-0227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purposes of this study are to prove that the content of floor flexibility can be designed objectively with the use of margins, which are an architectural vocabulary visualizing the possibility of formal change, and to conduct a case study on how the existing typical floor plans of South Korean apartments change with the extension of flexibility: the usability of margins and the results.Design/methodology/approachThis study reviews two housing projects with different methods of flexible housing design: one is the flexibility to change the sizes of spaces and the other is the flexibility to change the topology of spaces. In this paper, the architectural term “area margin” is used for the former and “linear margin” for the latter. These were applied to the case of current apartments in South Korea to transform them into floor plans with the two types of flexibility and investigated whether the proposed floor plans satisfy the required efficacy structurally and functionally.Findings This case study shows that margins can be used as architectural vocabularies representing flexible sizes of rooms and flexible boundaries with neighbors. The final form of the structural framework became homogeneous, even though it conserved its indigenous spatial characteristics of abundant natural sunlight and airflow. In addition, the transformed structural framework has higher rigidity than the original one, even though the transversal wall was cut off with a margin, as shown by the schematic representations in this paper. Research limitations/implicationsThe alternative plan, designed as a modification process, is not representative as a flexible floor plan. Rather, it is thought more important to make a range of variations rather than prototyping a model. This study starts from the premise that it is desirable for apartment house plans to share and encourage variations rather than aiming at typical sizes and shapes. Furthermore, this study exemplified the process to modify the existing typical floor plan into a flexible one using margins. Through this modification, it is thought that the typology of the South Korean apartment, which has succeeded in gaining social consensus for half a century, can be preserved while accommodating social changes in the future.Social implicationsThe control of future variations of floor plans will extend the socioeconomic and physical life of a building, enabling a reasonable reinvestment of resources.Originality/valueThis paper deals with a design method applying distinct visual symbols to different contexts of flexibility and using those as architectural vocabularies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国公寓灵活平面设计的案例研究,使用两种类型的边界
目的:本研究的目的是为了证明地板灵活性的内容可以客观地设计,使用边缘,这是一种可视化形式变化的可能性的建筑词汇,并对韩国公寓现有的典型平面图如何随着灵活性的扩展而变化进行案例研究:边缘的可用性和结果。设计/方法/途径本研究回顾了两个采用不同弹性住宅设计方法的住宅项目:一个是灵活地改变空间的大小,另一个是灵活地改变空间的拓扑结构。在本文中,前者使用建筑术语“面积边界”,后者使用“线性边界”。将这些应用于韩国现有公寓的案例,将其转换为具有两种灵活性的平面图,并调查拟议的平面图是否在结构和功能上满足所需的功效。这个案例研究表明,边界可以作为建筑词汇表,代表灵活的房间大小和与邻居的灵活边界。结构框架的最终形式变得均匀,即使它保留了丰富的自然阳光和气流的本土空间特征。此外,改造后的结构框架在横向墙体截去了一段余量的情况下,仍比原结构框架具有更高的刚度,如本文的示意图所示。研究的局限/启示作为一个修改过程而设计的备选平面图,作为一个灵活的平面图并不具有代表性。相反,人们认为制作一系列的变体比制作一个模型的原型更重要。这项研究的前提是,公寓的计划是可取的,共享和鼓励变化,而不是针对典型的大小和形状。此外,本研究举例说明了将现有的典型平面图修改为使用边缘的灵活平面图的过程。人们认为,通过这种修改,半个世纪以来成功获得社会共识的韩国公寓的类型学可以在适应未来社会变化的同时得到保留。社会意义控制未来平面图的变化将延长建筑物的社会经济和物理寿命,从而实现资源的合理再投资。原创性/价值本文探讨了一种设计方法,将不同的视觉符号应用于不同的灵活性语境,并将其作为建筑词汇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The journal of an association of institues and individuals concerned with housing, design and development in the built environment. Theories, tools and pratice with special emphasis on the local scale.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of earthquake resilience factors for buildings: the case of Istanbul high-rise buildings Geometric analysis of early Ottoman tombs within the context of conservation studies Public participation in the social sustainability evaluation of smart city infrastructure in the context of big data: a critical review Teaching parametric design: fostering algorithmic thinking through incomplete recipes Spatial accessibility dynamics of urban parks in Nanjing, China: implications for spatial equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1