Earth, wind and fire: island energy landscapes of the Anthropocene

IF 1.3 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Fennia-International Journal of Geography Pub Date : 2022-06-19 DOI:10.11143/fennia.113455
E. Huijbens, K. Benediktsson
{"title":"Earth, wind and fire: island energy landscapes of the Anthropocene","authors":"E. Huijbens, K. Benediktsson","doi":"10.11143/fennia.113455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbon-based systems of energy are rapidly unravelling. The imperative of climate emergency is reshaping energy landscapes, in some instances leading to the reappraisal of energy options hitherto sidelined. This paper deals with the emerging energy landscapes of the Netherlands and Iceland through historically informed tales that focus on islands. While vastly different in historical and geographical context and scale, these cases reveal the necessity of geographical nuance facilitated by the ways insular places offer insights into energy imaginaries of the Anthropocene. The former is a historicised narrative about the reinvention of wind energy as natural gas is being ousted. It focuses on the proposed Dogger Bank Power Link Islands, the first of which is scheduled to emerge in the coming years. The latter, also historically informed, identifies the context for current large wind energy proposals in Iceland, and then contrasts these with the authors’ empirical observations from the small peripheral island of Grímsey. There wind energy is also being reinvented for ousting the predominant oil infrastructure on the island. These cases represent experimental opportunities for envisioning Anthropocene futures intended to destabilize imaginaries of growth in ways that open spaces for negotiation and contestation. They problematize dominant narratives that render wind energy development visible and knowable as a necessary intervention. Emergent from this is wind’s decentred energy landscape in the Anthropocene; an epoch where energy is revealed in its importance to our societies, dispelling the human exceptionalism implicit in the nomenclature whilst at the same time showing how our actions come to matter. The collision of the Earth and ourselves under the terms of climate emergency begs the question whether our differences are the only ones that matter? But also, if it matters what we have done, then surely it matters what we have not done and chosen to ignore.","PeriodicalId":45082,"journal":{"name":"Fennia-International Journal of Geography","volume":"242 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fennia-International Journal of Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.113455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Carbon-based systems of energy are rapidly unravelling. The imperative of climate emergency is reshaping energy landscapes, in some instances leading to the reappraisal of energy options hitherto sidelined. This paper deals with the emerging energy landscapes of the Netherlands and Iceland through historically informed tales that focus on islands. While vastly different in historical and geographical context and scale, these cases reveal the necessity of geographical nuance facilitated by the ways insular places offer insights into energy imaginaries of the Anthropocene. The former is a historicised narrative about the reinvention of wind energy as natural gas is being ousted. It focuses on the proposed Dogger Bank Power Link Islands, the first of which is scheduled to emerge in the coming years. The latter, also historically informed, identifies the context for current large wind energy proposals in Iceland, and then contrasts these with the authors’ empirical observations from the small peripheral island of Grímsey. There wind energy is also being reinvented for ousting the predominant oil infrastructure on the island. These cases represent experimental opportunities for envisioning Anthropocene futures intended to destabilize imaginaries of growth in ways that open spaces for negotiation and contestation. They problematize dominant narratives that render wind energy development visible and knowable as a necessary intervention. Emergent from this is wind’s decentred energy landscape in the Anthropocene; an epoch where energy is revealed in its importance to our societies, dispelling the human exceptionalism implicit in the nomenclature whilst at the same time showing how our actions come to matter. The collision of the Earth and ourselves under the terms of climate emergency begs the question whether our differences are the only ones that matter? But also, if it matters what we have done, then surely it matters what we have not done and chosen to ignore.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地球、风和火:人类世的岛屿能源景观
碳基能源体系正在迅速瓦解。气候紧急情况的迫不得已正在重塑能源格局,在某些情况下导致重新评估迄今被搁置的能源选择。本文通过关注岛屿的历史故事来处理荷兰和冰岛新兴的能源景观。虽然在历史和地理背景和规模上有很大的不同,但这些案例揭示了地理上细微差别的必要性,这些细微差别是由孤立的地方提供对人类世能量想象的见解所促进的。前者是一种历史化的叙述,讲述了在天然气被取代之际,风能的重新发明。它的重点是拟议中的多格尔银行电力连接群岛,其中第一个计划在未来几年内出现。后者也从历史角度出发,确定了冰岛目前大型风能提案的背景,然后将其与作者在Grímsey小外围岛屿上的经验观察结果进行了对比。为了取代岛上占主导地位的石油基础设施,风能也正在被改造。这些案例为设想人类世的未来提供了实验机会,旨在以开放谈判和争论空间的方式打破对增长的想象。他们对主流叙事提出了问题,这些叙事将风能开发视为一种必要的干预措施。由此产生的是人类世中风的非中心能源景观;能源对我们社会的重要性被揭示的时代,消除了命名法中隐含的人类例外论,同时展示了我们的行动是如何产生影响的。在气候紧急情况下,地球和我们的碰撞引出了这样一个问题:我们的差异是否是唯一重要的?但是,如果我们做了什么很重要,那么我们没有做什么和选择忽视什么当然也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Performing arts of embodied refusal amid anthropogenic climate change: the Salim Ali Biodiversity Park and Bird Sanctuary, Pune, India Languaging as refusal Refusal – opening otherwise forms of research “Freedom is a treasure that only those who lose it can know”: a spatiotemporal exploration of 22 Iraqi women’s interlegalities South Asian students’ migration to, within and from Finland and Sweden: connecting the dots to arrivals and departures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1