Empirical evidence of attribute framing: the case of unsophisticated IPO investors

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Review of Behavioral Finance Pub Date : 2022-09-09 DOI:10.1108/rbf-01-2022-0008
Albert Rapp
{"title":"Empirical evidence of attribute framing: the case of unsophisticated IPO investors","authors":"Albert Rapp","doi":"10.1108/rbf-01-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the empirical relevance of attribute framing in the financial marketplace.Design/methodology/approachIncorporating a sample of German initial public offerings (IPOs) from 2010 to 2019, the author uses quantitative methods, including regression models and tests for the equality of means, to analyze whether unsophisticated investors are susceptible to attribute framing and whether this susceptibility reflects irrational behavior.FindingsUnsophisticated investors, who are typically retail investors, are susceptible to attribute framing. They are likely to subscribe to IPOs whose attribute “market valuation” is framed in a positive way, that is, IPOs with low offer prices. As low-priced IPOs are overvalued and underperform in the secondary market relative to high-priced IPOs, the susceptibility to attribute framing reflects irrational behavior. The findings are robust to controlling for sentiment.Research limitations/implicationsSince this paper includes a relatively small sample from a single stock market, future research might employ alternative approaches.Social implicationsWhen issuers and underwriters are able to exploit retail investors through attribute framing, the participation of these investors in the financial marketplace may finally decrease. Therefore, the financial literacy of retail investors needs to be improved.Originality/valueThis paper is the first to provide empirical evidence of attribute framing in a financial markets context. While most previous research on IPO offer prices focuses on US stocks, this paper is the first to incorporate German stocks.","PeriodicalId":44559,"journal":{"name":"Review of Behavioral Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Behavioral Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rbf-01-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the empirical relevance of attribute framing in the financial marketplace.Design/methodology/approachIncorporating a sample of German initial public offerings (IPOs) from 2010 to 2019, the author uses quantitative methods, including regression models and tests for the equality of means, to analyze whether unsophisticated investors are susceptible to attribute framing and whether this susceptibility reflects irrational behavior.FindingsUnsophisticated investors, who are typically retail investors, are susceptible to attribute framing. They are likely to subscribe to IPOs whose attribute “market valuation” is framed in a positive way, that is, IPOs with low offer prices. As low-priced IPOs are overvalued and underperform in the secondary market relative to high-priced IPOs, the susceptibility to attribute framing reflects irrational behavior. The findings are robust to controlling for sentiment.Research limitations/implicationsSince this paper includes a relatively small sample from a single stock market, future research might employ alternative approaches.Social implicationsWhen issuers and underwriters are able to exploit retail investors through attribute framing, the participation of these investors in the financial marketplace may finally decrease. Therefore, the financial literacy of retail investors needs to be improved.Originality/valueThis paper is the first to provide empirical evidence of attribute framing in a financial markets context. While most previous research on IPO offer prices focuses on US stocks, this paper is the first to incorporate German stocks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
属性框架的经验证据:以不成熟的IPO投资者为例
目的研究金融市场中属性框架的实证相关性。设计/方法/方法结合2010年至2019年德国首次公开发行(ipo)的样本,作者使用定量方法,包括回归模型和均值相等性检验,分析不成熟的投资者是否容易受到属性框架的影响,以及这种敏感性是否反映了非理性行为。经验不足的投资者通常是散户,他们很容易受到属性框架的影响。他们可能会认购那些“市场估值”属性以积极方式设定的ipo,即发行价格较低的ipo。由于相对于高价ipo,低价ipo在二级市场的估值过高且表现不佳,对属性框架的敏感性反映了非理性行为。研究结果在控制情绪方面是强有力的。研究的局限性/意义由于本文包含了来自单一股票市场的相对较小的样本,未来的研究可能会采用替代方法。社会影响当发行人和承销商能够通过属性框架利用散户投资者时,这些投资者在金融市场的参与度可能最终会下降。因此,散户投资者的金融素养有待提高。原创性/价值本文首次提供了金融市场背景下属性框架的经验证据。虽然以往对IPO发行价格的研究大多集中在美国股票上,但本文首次纳入了德国股票。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Behavioral Finance
Review of Behavioral Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Review of Behavioral Finance publishes high quality original peer-reviewed articles in the area of behavioural finance. The RBF focus is on Behavioural Finance but with a very broad lens looking at how the behavioural attributes of the decision makers influence the financial structure of a company, investors’ portfolios, and the functioning of financial markets. High quality empirical, experimental and/or theoretical research articles as well as well executed literature review articles are considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Deciphering CEO disclosure tone inconsistency: a behavioural exploration Lottery stocks in Brazil: investigating risk premium and investor behavior Do executive facial trustworthiness have impact on IPO underpricing in the Indonesia stock exchange? Global reversal strategy: equilibrium of endogenous trading? Global reversal strategy: equilibrium of endogenous trading?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1