Review of the Basic Elastic Mechanical Properties and Their Realignment to Establish Ductile Versus Brittle Failure Behaviors

IF 12.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS Applied Mechanics Reviews Pub Date : 2022-11-09 DOI:10.1115/1.4056203
R. M. Christensen
{"title":"Review of the Basic Elastic Mechanical Properties and Their Realignment to Establish Ductile Versus Brittle Failure Behaviors","authors":"R. M. Christensen","doi":"10.1115/1.4056203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The underlying formalism of isotropic elasticity theory is shown to benefit from a review and re-examination of its structure thereby yielding a realignment of the basic moduli type properties. When this is accomplished the pathway to understanding ductile versus brittle failure behaviors becomes much more accessible. The ductile/brittle transition in uniaxial tension then admits a simple and direct specification in terms of the two elastic moduli 2µ and k. The consequences of these results are discussed in the context of general failure theory.","PeriodicalId":8048,"journal":{"name":"Applied Mechanics Reviews","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Mechanics Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The underlying formalism of isotropic elasticity theory is shown to benefit from a review and re-examination of its structure thereby yielding a realignment of the basic moduli type properties. When this is accomplished the pathway to understanding ductile versus brittle failure behaviors becomes much more accessible. The ductile/brittle transition in uniaxial tension then admits a simple and direct specification in terms of the two elastic moduli 2µ and k. The consequences of these results are discussed in the context of general failure theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾基本弹性力学性能及其重新定位以建立韧性与脆性破坏行为
各向同性弹性理论的基本形式被证明受益于对其结构的审查和重新检查,从而产生基本模型性质的重新调整。当这一过程完成后,理解延性和脆性破坏行为的途径就变得更加容易了。然后,单轴拉伸下的韧性/脆性转变可以用两个弹性模量2µ和k来简单而直接地描述。这些结果的后果在一般破坏理论的背景下进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.20
自引率
0.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Mechanics Reviews (AMR) is an international review journal that serves as a premier venue for dissemination of material across all subdisciplines of applied mechanics and engineering science, including fluid and solid mechanics, heat transfer, dynamics and vibration, and applications.AMR provides an archival repository for state-of-the-art and retrospective survey articles and reviews of research areas and curricular developments. The journal invites commentary on research and education policy in different countries. The journal also invites original tutorial and educational material in applied mechanics targeting non-specialist audiences, including undergraduate and K-12 students.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Investigation of Unidirectional Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Plastics under High Strain Rates A Simple and Effective Method to Evaluate Seismic Maximum Floor Velocities for Steel-Framed Structures with Supplementary Dampers Dynamic Analysis of a Timoshenko–Ehrenfest Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube in the Presence of Surface Effects: The Truncated Theory MechGPT, a Language-Based Strategy for Mechanics and Materials Modeling That Connects Knowledge Across Scales, Disciplines and Modalities Refined and Simplified Simulations for Steel–Concrete–Steel Structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1