Preston's universal formula for avian egg shape

J. Biggins, R. Montgomerie, Jamie E. Thompson, T. Birkhead
{"title":"Preston's universal formula for avian egg shape","authors":"J. Biggins, R. Montgomerie, Jamie E. Thompson, T. Birkhead","doi":"10.1093/ornithology/ukac028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Nearly 70 years ago, Preston published a pioneering study in which he provided formulae for the shapes of birds' eggs. One of these formulae is universal in that it provides an almost perfect representation for all eggs, even pyriform ones, and is better than all other formulae published since. This essentially perfect representation of egg shape is obtained by estimating the parameters in Preston's universal formula by least squares, using hundreds of measurements of the egg's radii along its entire length. Preston's universal formula can also be used to obtain an equation for avian egg shape that uses just 5 measurements (the length and 4 appropriately spaced diameters). The equation based solely on these 5 measurements provides an egg shape that is virtually indistinguishable from one based on hundreds of measurements. We demonstrate the usefulness of Preston's formulations using digital photographs of eggs. Our perspective is that, despite a number of subsequent approaches, Preston's original one has not been bettered and should be the standard for studying avian egg shape. LAY SUMMARY The shapes of birds' eggs vary considerably, from the archetypal ovoid shape of the hen's egg, through those that are almost spherical, to eggs that are pointed at one or both ends. In the 1950s, the engineer and amateur ornithologist Frank W. Preston published methods for measuring and quantifying avian egg shape. Unfortunately, his equations proved rather inaccessible to ornithologists and have largely been ignored. As a result, there has been a succession of papers claiming to have solved the problem of quantifying avian egg shape, including some with titles that imply that their approach is better than anything previously published, but without testing the validity of their claims. Here, we show that all of these papers were trying to solve a problem that Preston had resolved long ago. All methods of estimating egg shape published since the 1950s are all, to varying extents, less accurate than Preston's original formulation. Preston provides the most perfect formula for “the most perfect thing,” a bird's egg. RESUMEN Hace casi setenta años, Preston publicó un estudio pionero en el que proporcionaba fórmulas para las formas de los huevos de las aves. Una de estas fórmulas es universal porque proporciona una representación casi perfecta de todos los huevos, incluso los piriformes, y es mejor que todas las demás fórmulas publicadas desde entonces. Esta representación esencialmente perfecta de la forma del huevo se obtiene estimando los parámetros en la fórmula universal de Preston mediante mínimos cuadrados, usando cientos de medidas de los radios del huevo a lo largo de toda su longitud. La fórmula universal de Preston también puede ser usada para obtener una ecuación para la forma del huevo aviar que utiliza solo cinco medidas (la longitud y cuatro diámetros espaciados adecuadamente). La ecuación basada únicamente en estas 5 medidas proporciona una forma de huevo que es prácticamente indistinguible de una basada en cientos de medidas. Demostramos la utilidad de las formulaciones de Preston utilizando fotografías digitales de huevos. Nuestra perspectiva es que, a pesar de una serie de enfoques posteriores, el enfoque original de Preston no ha sido mejorado y debería ser el estándar para estudiar la forma del huevo aviar.","PeriodicalId":19617,"journal":{"name":"Ornithology","volume":"58 1","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithology/ukac028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nearly 70 years ago, Preston published a pioneering study in which he provided formulae for the shapes of birds' eggs. One of these formulae is universal in that it provides an almost perfect representation for all eggs, even pyriform ones, and is better than all other formulae published since. This essentially perfect representation of egg shape is obtained by estimating the parameters in Preston's universal formula by least squares, using hundreds of measurements of the egg's radii along its entire length. Preston's universal formula can also be used to obtain an equation for avian egg shape that uses just 5 measurements (the length and 4 appropriately spaced diameters). The equation based solely on these 5 measurements provides an egg shape that is virtually indistinguishable from one based on hundreds of measurements. We demonstrate the usefulness of Preston's formulations using digital photographs of eggs. Our perspective is that, despite a number of subsequent approaches, Preston's original one has not been bettered and should be the standard for studying avian egg shape. LAY SUMMARY The shapes of birds' eggs vary considerably, from the archetypal ovoid shape of the hen's egg, through those that are almost spherical, to eggs that are pointed at one or both ends. In the 1950s, the engineer and amateur ornithologist Frank W. Preston published methods for measuring and quantifying avian egg shape. Unfortunately, his equations proved rather inaccessible to ornithologists and have largely been ignored. As a result, there has been a succession of papers claiming to have solved the problem of quantifying avian egg shape, including some with titles that imply that their approach is better than anything previously published, but without testing the validity of their claims. Here, we show that all of these papers were trying to solve a problem that Preston had resolved long ago. All methods of estimating egg shape published since the 1950s are all, to varying extents, less accurate than Preston's original formulation. Preston provides the most perfect formula for “the most perfect thing,” a bird's egg. RESUMEN Hace casi setenta años, Preston publicó un estudio pionero en el que proporcionaba fórmulas para las formas de los huevos de las aves. Una de estas fórmulas es universal porque proporciona una representación casi perfecta de todos los huevos, incluso los piriformes, y es mejor que todas las demás fórmulas publicadas desde entonces. Esta representación esencialmente perfecta de la forma del huevo se obtiene estimando los parámetros en la fórmula universal de Preston mediante mínimos cuadrados, usando cientos de medidas de los radios del huevo a lo largo de toda su longitud. La fórmula universal de Preston también puede ser usada para obtener una ecuación para la forma del huevo aviar que utiliza solo cinco medidas (la longitud y cuatro diámetros espaciados adecuadamente). La ecuación basada únicamente en estas 5 medidas proporciona una forma de huevo que es prácticamente indistinguible de una basada en cientos de medidas. Demostramos la utilidad de las formulaciones de Preston utilizando fotografías digitales de huevos. Nuestra perspectiva es que, a pesar de una serie de enfoques posteriores, el enfoque original de Preston no ha sido mejorado y debería ser el estándar para estudiar la forma del huevo aviar.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普雷斯顿的鸟蛋形状通用公式
近70年前,普雷斯顿发表了一项开创性的研究,他在研究中提供了鸟蛋形状的公式。其中一个公式是通用的,因为它几乎完美地代表了所有的鸡蛋,甚至梨形的鸡蛋,并且比此后发表的所有其他公式都要好。鸡蛋形状的这种本质上完美的表现是通过对普雷斯顿通用公式中的参数进行最小二乘估计而得到的,该公式使用了数百次鸡蛋沿其整个长度的半径测量。普雷斯顿的通用公式也可以用来得到一个公式,禽蛋的形状,只使用5个测量值(长度和4个适当间隔的直径)。仅基于这5个测量值的方程提供了一个鸡蛋形状,与基于数百个测量值的鸡蛋形状几乎没有区别。我们用鸡蛋的数码照片证明了普雷斯顿公式的实用性。我们的观点是,尽管后来有许多方法,但普雷斯顿的原始方法并没有更好,应该成为研究鸟蛋形状的标准。鸟蛋的形状变化很大,从原始的卵形鸡蛋到几乎球形的鸡蛋,再到一端或两端都是尖的鸡蛋。20世纪50年代,工程师兼业余鸟类学家弗兰克·w·普雷斯顿(Frank W. Preston)发表了测量和量化鸟蛋形状的方法。不幸的是,事实证明,鸟类学家很难理解他的方程式,基本上被忽略了。因此,有一系列的论文声称已经解决了量化鸟蛋形状的问题,其中一些论文的标题暗示他们的方法比以前发表的任何方法都要好,但没有测试他们声称的有效性。在这里,我们展示了所有这些论文都试图解决普雷斯顿很久以前就解决了的问题。自20世纪50年代以来发表的所有估算鸡蛋形状的方法,在不同程度上都不如普雷斯顿最初的公式准确。普雷斯顿为“最完美的东西”提供了最完美的公式,那就是鸟蛋。简历Hace casi setenta años, Preston publicó unestudio pionero en el que proporcionaba fórmulas para as formas de los huevos de las aves。Una de estas fórmulas es universal porque proporcition Una representación casi perfecta de todos los huevos,包括los piriformes,通过主要que todas las demás fórmulas publicadas desde entonces。Esta representación esencialmente perfecta de la la forma del huevo se obtiene estimando los parámetros en la fórmula universal de Preston mediante mínimos cuadrados, usando cientos de medidas de los无线电del huevo a lo largo de toda sulongitude。拉公式普遍·德·普雷斯顿也ser美国对位obtener una ecuacion对位拉福马del蛋黄aviar,它独自cinco medidas (La longitud y四弦吉他diametros espaciados adecuadamente)。La ecuación basada únicamente en estas 5 medias proporciciona una forma de huevo que es prácticamente uninguible de basada en cientos de medias。公共事业的发展与发展:公共事业的发展与发展fotografías数字经济的发展。新视角是独一无二的,这是一种独特的风格,一种独特的风格,一种独特的风格,一种独特的风格,一种独特的风格,一种独特的风格,一种独特的风格,一种独特的风格,一种独特的风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blue-footed Boobies: Sibling Conflict and Sexual Infidelity on a Tropical Island The Great Rift Valley is a more pronounced biogeographic barrier than the Blue Nile Valley for six Ethiopian Highland passerines in the eastern Afromontane biodiversity hotspot The Birds That Audubon Missed: Discovery and Desire in the American Wilderness A late Pleistocene nest cave of Gymnogyps californianus (California Condor) in Texas: New radiocarbon and stable isotope analyses Sixty-fifth Supplement to the American Ornithological Society’s Check-list of North American Birds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1