Women’s Political Leadership: One Question and Two Divergent Fatwās

IF 0.6 0 RELIGION Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1017/jlr.2022.15
E. Yakar
{"title":"Women’s Political Leadership: One Question and Two Divergent Fatwās","authors":"E. Yakar","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Women’s political leadership is one of the abiding controversial issues among Muslim scholars. The question of whether a Muslim woman can lead in her country is generally answered negatively by Muslim scholars, but some modern scholars explicitly support women’s political leadership without any restriction. Where the scholars stand on the issue is influenced by their social context. With the intent of examining the interaction between social context and Islamic legal methodologies in fatwās—Isalmic legal opinions—related to women, the author discusses as exemplary texts the fatwās issued by two well-known religious institutions, the Dār al-Iftā’ in Saudi Arabia and the Diyanet in Turkey. The institutions function in different social contexts: Saudi Arabia is a theocratic monarchy that applies Islamic law; Turkey is a democratic country whose legal system is based on a secular law. Through a detailed analysis of the spatio-temporal fatwās regarding women’s political leadership, the author provides insight into the influence of contextual elements during the process of issuing fatwās, suggesting that these differences of opinion among Muslim scholars and religious institutions will continue.","PeriodicalId":44042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"212 1","pages":"334 - 364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2022.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Women’s political leadership is one of the abiding controversial issues among Muslim scholars. The question of whether a Muslim woman can lead in her country is generally answered negatively by Muslim scholars, but some modern scholars explicitly support women’s political leadership without any restriction. Where the scholars stand on the issue is influenced by their social context. With the intent of examining the interaction between social context and Islamic legal methodologies in fatwās—Isalmic legal opinions—related to women, the author discusses as exemplary texts the fatwās issued by two well-known religious institutions, the Dār al-Iftā’ in Saudi Arabia and the Diyanet in Turkey. The institutions function in different social contexts: Saudi Arabia is a theocratic monarchy that applies Islamic law; Turkey is a democratic country whose legal system is based on a secular law. Through a detailed analysis of the spatio-temporal fatwās regarding women’s political leadership, the author provides insight into the influence of contextual elements during the process of issuing fatwās, suggesting that these differences of opinion among Muslim scholars and religious institutions will continue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女政治领导:一个问题和两个分歧Fatwās
妇女的政治领导权一直是穆斯林学者争论不休的问题之一。穆斯林学者对穆斯林妇女能否在自己的国家领导这个问题的回答通常是否定的,但一些现代学者明确支持妇女的政治领导,不受任何限制。学者在这个问题上的立场受到他们所处的社会背景的影响。为了审查fatwās-Isalmic与妇女有关的法律意见中社会背景和伊斯兰法律方法之间的相互作用,作者讨论了两个著名宗教机构,即沙特阿拉伯的Dār al-Iftā '和土耳其的Diyanet发表的fatwās作为示范文本。这些机构在不同的社会背景下发挥作用:沙特阿拉伯是一个神权君主制国家,适用伊斯兰法律;土耳其是一个民主国家,其法律体系以世俗法为基础。通过对妇女政治领导的时空fatwās的详细分析,作者洞察了在fatwās发布过程中背景因素的影响,表明穆斯林学者和宗教机构之间的这些意见分歧将继续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Law and Religion publishes cutting-edge research on religion, human rights, and religious freedom; religion-state relations; religious sources and dimensions of public, private, penal, and procedural law; religious legal systems and their place in secular law; theological jurisprudence; political theology; legal and religious ethics; and more. The Journal provides a distinguished forum for deep dialogue among Buddhist, Confucian, Christian, Hindu, Indigenous, Jewish, Muslim, and other faith traditions about fundamental questions of law, society, and politics.
期刊最新文献
Defending the Sacred into the Future - Defend the Sacred: Native American Religious Freedom beyond the First Amendment By Michael D. McNally. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. 400. $99.95 (cloth); $26.95 (paper); $26.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780691190891 – CORRIGENDUM Life at the Margins: Religious Minorities, Status, and the State Religious Freedom and Sacred Lands Religious Liberty and the American Founding: Natural Rights and the Original Meanings of the First Amendment Religion Clauses. By Vincent Phillip Muñoz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022. Pp. 334. $95.00 (cloth); $30.00 (paper). ISBN: 9781501753978. Wives’ Work: Gender and Status in a List from the Mishnah
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1