Formative value of descriptive grades in mathematics instruction for beginners

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.2298/ZIPI1601127D
J. Djelic, Sanja M. Maričić, Krstivoje M. Špijunović
{"title":"Formative value of descriptive grades in mathematics instruction for beginners","authors":"J. Djelic, Sanja M. Maričić, Krstivoje M. Špijunović","doi":"10.2298/ZIPI1601127D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Descriptive grading has been implemented in the first grade of primary school in the Republic of Serbia from 2003. The monitoring of this system novelty has been absent since research community most often dealt with teachers’ attitudes and their self-evaluation of the competences for descriptive grading. This form of grading, which stems from the social constructivist paradigm, is observed as the trigger of development of the formative approach in assessment, which has been in the focus of theoreticians and practitioners in the past thirty years, especially in the United States of America and Great Britain. The method of content analysis was applied to 316 descriptive grades in mathematics given to first grade primary students. The quality of three key elements was assessed: the description of academic achievement, the description of students’ engagement and the recommendations to achieve further progress, as well as the balance of quality between the elements of the same descriptive grade. Research results have shown that descriptive grades mostly lack the necessary formative capacity. This means that the majority of students this sample of grades was prepared for did not receive quality and comprehensive feedback, which would be conducive for their further education. Formative assessment, as one of the implications of the constructivist theoretical grounding, demands a high level of development of teacher competences for monitoring the progress and assessing the students, which has not been confirmed in the present research.","PeriodicalId":42259,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI1601127D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Descriptive grading has been implemented in the first grade of primary school in the Republic of Serbia from 2003. The monitoring of this system novelty has been absent since research community most often dealt with teachers’ attitudes and their self-evaluation of the competences for descriptive grading. This form of grading, which stems from the social constructivist paradigm, is observed as the trigger of development of the formative approach in assessment, which has been in the focus of theoreticians and practitioners in the past thirty years, especially in the United States of America and Great Britain. The method of content analysis was applied to 316 descriptive grades in mathematics given to first grade primary students. The quality of three key elements was assessed: the description of academic achievement, the description of students’ engagement and the recommendations to achieve further progress, as well as the balance of quality between the elements of the same descriptive grade. Research results have shown that descriptive grades mostly lack the necessary formative capacity. This means that the majority of students this sample of grades was prepared for did not receive quality and comprehensive feedback, which would be conducive for their further education. Formative assessment, as one of the implications of the constructivist theoretical grounding, demands a high level of development of teacher competences for monitoring the progress and assessing the students, which has not been confirmed in the present research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
描述性分数在初学数学教学中的形成价值
自2003年以来,塞尔维亚共和国在小学一年级实施了描述性评分。由于研究界经常处理教师的态度和他们对描述性评分能力的自我评价,因此缺乏对这一系统新颖性的监测。这种评分形式源于社会建构主义范式,被认为是形成性评估方法发展的导火索,在过去三十年中,形成性评估方法一直是理论家和实践者的焦点,特别是在美国和英国。采用内容分析法对小学一年级学生的316个数学描述性成绩进行了分析。评估了三个关键要素的质量:学业成绩的描述,学生参与度的描述和进一步进步的建议,以及相同描述等级的要素之间的质量平衡。研究结果表明,描述性成绩大多缺乏必要的形成能力。这意味着,大多数学生的成绩样本准备没有得到质量和全面的反馈,这将有利于他们的进一步教育。形成性评价作为建构主义理论基础的内涵之一,要求教师具备高度的能力来监控学生的学习进度和评价学生,而这一点在目前的研究中尚未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja
Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoska Istrazivanja EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of play interaction in twins with autism spectrum disorder A phenomenological analysis of teacher experiences during professional learning on the implementation of the question formulation technique Scaffolding the learning during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic - secondary school students’ perspective Teachers’ diversity awareness and critical consciousness - sine qua non of social justice in schools Modeling the relationships between transformational leadership, teacher academic optimism, and teacher engagement: Evidence from the Serbian school context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1