Algorithmic Decision-making and the Law

D. Brand
{"title":"Algorithmic Decision-making and the Law","authors":"D. Brand","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v12i1.576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Fourth Industrial Revolution is reshaping the world we know dramatically and is characterised by a close interaction between the biological, digital and physical spheres.  Digital technologies are impacting all facets of our lives and create a series of new opportunities but also various challenges.  The Fourth Industrial Revolution does not follow a linear development trajectory, but due to the diverse nature and rapid pace of technological developments, could rather be compared to a series of networks with multiple connecting points.  This has caused the development of the law which deals with these concerns to generally be slow and unable to match the pace and scope of technological developments. In the context of public law there are many questions and challenges relating to individual rights, for example the right to privacy, and the role and responsibilities of government relating to policy development and regulation dealing with the Fourth Industrial Revolution.  The concept of a Rechtsstaat could arguably provide an appropriate legal framework for shaping the ethical framework, normative standards and a value-based governance model for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, including for algorithmic decision-making. The public law concept of accountability should be contextualised in order to apply it to algorithmic decision-making.  In the data-driven economy of the 21st century the pace and scope of technological developments that impact humanity requires the development of appropriate legal frameworks to reflect and accommodate the needs of society, in particular relating to the recognition of fundamental human rights.  It is concluded that  a broad set of ethical and legal principles, which can guide the development of international and national legal frameworks to regulate algorithmic decision-making, is needed.","PeriodicalId":36678,"journal":{"name":"eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v12i1.576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Fourth Industrial Revolution is reshaping the world we know dramatically and is characterised by a close interaction between the biological, digital and physical spheres.  Digital technologies are impacting all facets of our lives and create a series of new opportunities but also various challenges.  The Fourth Industrial Revolution does not follow a linear development trajectory, but due to the diverse nature and rapid pace of technological developments, could rather be compared to a series of networks with multiple connecting points.  This has caused the development of the law which deals with these concerns to generally be slow and unable to match the pace and scope of technological developments. In the context of public law there are many questions and challenges relating to individual rights, for example the right to privacy, and the role and responsibilities of government relating to policy development and regulation dealing with the Fourth Industrial Revolution.  The concept of a Rechtsstaat could arguably provide an appropriate legal framework for shaping the ethical framework, normative standards and a value-based governance model for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, including for algorithmic decision-making. The public law concept of accountability should be contextualised in order to apply it to algorithmic decision-making.  In the data-driven economy of the 21st century the pace and scope of technological developments that impact humanity requires the development of appropriate legal frameworks to reflect and accommodate the needs of society, in particular relating to the recognition of fundamental human rights.  It is concluded that  a broad set of ethical and legal principles, which can guide the development of international and national legal frameworks to regulate algorithmic decision-making, is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
算法决策与法律
第四次工业革命正在戏剧性地重塑我们所知的世界,其特点是生物、数字和物理领域之间的密切互动。数字技术正在影响我们生活的方方面面,创造了一系列新的机会,但也带来了各种各样的挑战。第四次工业革命并不遵循线性发展轨迹,而是由于技术发展的多样性和速度的快捷性,它可以被比作一系列具有多个连接点的网络。这导致处理这些问题的法律的发展通常是缓慢的,无法与技术发展的速度和范围相匹配。在公法的背景下,有许多与个人权利有关的问题和挑战,例如隐私权,以及与第四次工业革命的政策制定和监管有关的政府的角色和责任。Rechtsstaat的概念可以说可以为第四次工业革命(包括算法决策)的道德框架、规范标准和基于价值的治理模式的形成提供一个适当的法律框架。为了将公法中的问责制概念应用于算法决策,应将其置于背景中。在21世纪数据驱动的经济中,影响人类的技术发展的速度和范围要求制定适当的法律框架,以反映和适应社会的需要,特别是在承认基本人权方面。结论是,需要一套广泛的道德和法律原则,以指导国际和国家法律框架的发展,以规范算法决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Democratising Democracy: Votes-Weighted Representation Examining the Impact of Transparency Portals on Media Coverage Implementing e-procurement at the Zimbabwe’s National Pharmaceutical Company (NatPharm): Challenges and Prospects Open Government Data Programs and Information Privacy Concerns: A Literature Review Defining Transparency: A Functional Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1