Capacity in Victorian Guardianship Law: Options for Reform

J. Chesterman
{"title":"Capacity in Victorian Guardianship Law: Options for Reform","authors":"J. Chesterman","doi":"10.26180/5DB7FDDA56E6D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Victorian Guardianship and Administration Act 1986 (Vic) is currently under review by the Victorian Law Reform Commission. This article investigates the criteria that need to be established before a guardian can be appointed under the current Act, and draws on developments in other jurisdictions and in international law, as well as on expertise at Victoria's Office of the Public Advocate, to argue that these criteria should be amended. In particular, the article argues that the criteria should be more narrowly confined to those situations where an impairment renders an individual unable to make a specific decision, or when the failure to appoint a guardian to make a particular decision would place an individual at an unacceptable risk of harm.","PeriodicalId":44672,"journal":{"name":"Monash University Law Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26180/5DB7FDDA56E6D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Victorian Guardianship and Administration Act 1986 (Vic) is currently under review by the Victorian Law Reform Commission. This article investigates the criteria that need to be established before a guardian can be appointed under the current Act, and draws on developments in other jurisdictions and in international law, as well as on expertise at Victoria's Office of the Public Advocate, to argue that these criteria should be amended. In particular, the article argues that the criteria should be more narrowly confined to those situations where an impairment renders an individual unable to make a specific decision, or when the failure to appoint a guardian to make a particular decision would place an individual at an unacceptable risk of harm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维多利亚监护法中的行为能力:改革的选择
《1986年维多利亚州监护和管理法》目前正在由维多利亚州法律改革委员会进行审查。本文调查了在现行法案下可以指定监护人之前需要建立的标准,并借鉴了其他司法管辖区和国际法的发展,以及维多利亚州公共辩护办公室的专业知识,认为这些标准应该修改。特别是,该条认为,标准应更狭义地局限于下列情况:残疾使个人无法作出具体决定,或未能指定监护人作出具体决定将使个人面临不可接受的伤害风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Section 32(1) of the Victorian Charter: strained constructions and legislative intention Peoplehood Obscured? The Normative Status of Self-Determination after the Chagos Advisory Opinion (Advance) Is the Wisdom of a Person's Decision Relevant to Their Capacity to Make That Decision? Not Black and White?: Disciplinary Regulation of Doctors Convicted of Child Pornography Offences in Australia Reconceptualising the Law of the Dead by Expanding the Interests of the Living
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1