Nutritional and Antinutritional Characteristics of Two Biofortified Bean Varieties Grown in Kenya

Alice W. Ritho, Daniel N. Sila, Z. Ndungu
{"title":"Nutritional and Antinutritional Characteristics of Two Biofortified Bean Varieties Grown in Kenya","authors":"Alice W. Ritho, Daniel N. Sila, Z. Ndungu","doi":"10.12944/crnfsj.11.2.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The introduction of biofortified bean varieties has brought attention to their potential as a source of high iron and zinc content. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the nutritional composition and antinutrient content of two biofortified bean varieties in Kenya, namely Angaza and Nyota. Methodology: The Proximate composition and mineral content were analyzed using standard AOAC procedures. HPLC analysis was used to determine the Phytic acid content, and the vanillin-HCL method to analyze tannins. Results:The two bean varieties had no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in carbohydrate content, with Nyota beans at 63.21% and Angaza beans at 61.67%. However, Nyota beans exhibited significantly higher protein content (19.97%) compared to Angaza beans (18.88%) with (P < 0.05). While Nyota beans had lower crude fiber (3.65%) compared to Angaza beans (4.78%), the variety showed significantly higher crude fat content (3.23%) than Angaza (1.55%). Both varieties had similar levels of crude ash, i.e., Nyota 3.29%, and Angaza 3.35%. Nyota beans demonstrated higher Iron and Zinc levels, i.e., 5.36 mg/100g and 2.77mg/100g respectively, compared to Angaza beans, 5.07 mg/100g Iron and 2.30 mg/100g Zinc. Nyota beans showed significantly lower levels of phytic acid, i.e., 2.53 mg/g and tannins 2.32 mg/g. Conclusions: The study found no significant statistical difference in the nutritional characteristics of the two varieties. However, the Nyota had higher protein, fat and mineral content, and lower levels of phytates and tannins. Thus, this study concludes that Nyota could have potential nutritional advantages over the Angaza variety.","PeriodicalId":10916,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12944/crnfsj.11.2.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The introduction of biofortified bean varieties has brought attention to their potential as a source of high iron and zinc content. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the nutritional composition and antinutrient content of two biofortified bean varieties in Kenya, namely Angaza and Nyota. Methodology: The Proximate composition and mineral content were analyzed using standard AOAC procedures. HPLC analysis was used to determine the Phytic acid content, and the vanillin-HCL method to analyze tannins. Results:The two bean varieties had no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in carbohydrate content, with Nyota beans at 63.21% and Angaza beans at 61.67%. However, Nyota beans exhibited significantly higher protein content (19.97%) compared to Angaza beans (18.88%) with (P < 0.05). While Nyota beans had lower crude fiber (3.65%) compared to Angaza beans (4.78%), the variety showed significantly higher crude fat content (3.23%) than Angaza (1.55%). Both varieties had similar levels of crude ash, i.e., Nyota 3.29%, and Angaza 3.35%. Nyota beans demonstrated higher Iron and Zinc levels, i.e., 5.36 mg/100g and 2.77mg/100g respectively, compared to Angaza beans, 5.07 mg/100g Iron and 2.30 mg/100g Zinc. Nyota beans showed significantly lower levels of phytic acid, i.e., 2.53 mg/g and tannins 2.32 mg/g. Conclusions: The study found no significant statistical difference in the nutritional characteristics of the two varieties. However, the Nyota had higher protein, fat and mineral content, and lower levels of phytates and tannins. Thus, this study concludes that Nyota could have potential nutritional advantages over the Angaza variety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚两种生物强化豆品种的营养和抗营养特性
导读:生物强化豆品种的引入引起了人们对其作为高铁和锌含量来源的潜力的关注。目的:研究肯尼亚两种生物强化大豆品种Angaza和Nyota的营养成分和抗营养成分。方法学:采用标准AOAC程序分析样品的近似成分和矿物含量。采用高效液相色谱法测定植酸含量,香兰素-盐酸法测定单宁含量。结果:两种豆的碳水化合物含量差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05), Nyota豆为63.21%,Angaza豆为61.67%。而Nyota豆的蛋白质含量为19.97%,显著高于Angaza豆(18.88%)(P < 0.05)。Nyota豆的粗纤维含量(3.65%)低于Angaza豆(4.78%),但其粗脂肪含量(3.23%)显著高于Angaza豆(1.55%)。两个品种的粗灰分含量相近,Nyota为3.29%,Angaza为3.35%。与Angaza豆(5.07 mg/100g铁和2.30 mg/100g锌)相比,Nyota豆的铁和锌含量分别为5.36 mg/100g和2.77mg/100g。青豆的植酸和单宁含量分别为2.53 mg/g和2.32 mg/g。结论:研究发现两个品种的营养特性没有显著的统计学差异。然而,Nyota的蛋白质、脂肪和矿物质含量较高,而植酸盐和单宁含量较低。因此,本研究得出结论,Nyota可能比Angaza品种具有潜在的营养优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction and Validation of a New Suchitra Scoring System and Determining the Cut off Value for Healthy Lifestyle Among College Students - Kumbakonam Urban Rural Epidemiological Study- KURES- 8 Phenolic Compounds, Free Radical Scavenging Activity and α-Glucosidase Inhibition Properties of Green, Oolong and Black Sacha Inchi Tea Extract Production and Characterization of Nata from Yam Bean Juice using Komagataeibacter nataicola TISTR 975 The Biological, Biochemical, and Immunological Impact of Broccoli and Green Pea Sprouts on Acrylamide Intoxicated Rats Cholesterol-lowering Effect of Protein Hydrolysates from Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1