Die Institutionalisierung der Evaluation in Europa

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation Pub Date : 2020-04-20 DOI:10.31244/zfe.2020.01.06
R. Stockmann, W. Meyer
{"title":"Die Institutionalisierung der Evaluation in Europa","authors":"R. Stockmann, W. Meyer","doi":"10.31244/zfe.2020.01.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although evaluation is booming worldwide, little is known about the institutionalization of evaluation in individual countries throughout the world. In order to overcome this lack of knowledge, the Center for Evaluation (CEval) of Saarland University has launched a research project that uses a comprehensive theoretical and methodological concept to examine the degree of institutionalization in all countries where evaluation plays a signifi cant role. A distinction is made between the political, social and professionalization systems. The results for Europe are now available. Despite the enormous cultural, social and political differences that exist between the European countries, it can be seen that institutionalization is strongest in the political system, but weakest in the social system. It is also astonishing that there is hardly any connection between the degree of institutionalization in the political and social system and the professionalization system. The cross-border driving forces have been above all administrative modernization (New Public Management, output/outcome control etc.) as well as the requirements of the EU.","PeriodicalId":41629,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation","volume":"85 1","pages":"111-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31244/zfe.2020.01.06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although evaluation is booming worldwide, little is known about the institutionalization of evaluation in individual countries throughout the world. In order to overcome this lack of knowledge, the Center for Evaluation (CEval) of Saarland University has launched a research project that uses a comprehensive theoretical and methodological concept to examine the degree of institutionalization in all countries where evaluation plays a signifi cant role. A distinction is made between the political, social and professionalization systems. The results for Europe are now available. Despite the enormous cultural, social and political differences that exist between the European countries, it can be seen that institutionalization is strongest in the political system, but weakest in the social system. It is also astonishing that there is hardly any connection between the degree of institutionalization in the political and social system and the professionalization system. The cross-border driving forces have been above all administrative modernization (New Public Management, output/outcome control etc.) as well as the requirements of the EU.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲评估的制度化
虽然评价在世界范围内蓬勃发展,但人们对世界各国评价制度化的情况知之甚少。为了克服这种知识的缺乏,萨尔大学评价中心(CEval)发起了一项研究项目,使用综合的理论和方法概念来检查评价发挥重要作用的所有国家的制度化程度。在政治、社会和专业化系统之间作出了区分。欧洲的结果现在已经公布了。尽管欧洲国家之间存在着巨大的文化、社会和政治差异,但可以看出,制度化在政治系统中是最强的,而在社会系统中是最弱的。同样令人惊讶的是,在政治和社会制度的制度化程度与专业化制度之间几乎没有任何联系。跨境驱动力首先是行政现代化(新公共管理、产出/结果控制等)以及欧盟的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation
Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Die Kompetenzstelle der Bundesregierung für Evaluierung im Statistischen Bundesamt Meta-Evaluierungen von Projektevaluierungen in der Praxis: Erfahrungen aus der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Terms of Reference Matter – Insights from Evaluations of Finnish Development Cooperation Machtwissen? Evaluation zwischen Evidenz und (Mikro-)Politik. Persönliche Eindrücke zur Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Evaluation e.V. (DeGEval), 14.–16. September 2022 Hybride Lehre an Universitäten – eine Evaluation hybrider Seminare am Beispiel des Kompetenzzentrums Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin Saarland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1