K. Eldahshan, Abdallah A. Alhabshy, Gaber E. Abutaleb
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY AMONG THE MAIN CATEGORIES OF NoSQL DATABASES","authors":"K. Eldahshan, Abdallah A. Alhabshy, Gaber E. Abutaleb","doi":"10.21608/absb.2020.210374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relational databases are usually used for data storage and retrieval. They are suitable for limited data volume. But when it comes to Bigdata, we need to use more flexible databases that satisfy the need to handle semi-structured and unstructured data. These databases are called NoSQL (Not only SQL) databases. This type of database was developed to interact with data of large volumes. NoSQL databases provide many features such as scalability, availability, replication models, file sharing, and schema-free. This paper’s main purpose is to present a comparative study of the five main categories of NoSQL databases; key-value stores, document stores, column family stores, graph stores databases, and object store NoSQL systems. Also, it discusses the famous database management systems for each one of these five categories. The comparison criteria used are performance, scalability, flexibility, complexity, and functionality. Moreover, this paper presents an overview of big data concepts. It briefly discusses the SQL databases versus NoSQL databases in terms of their high-level characteristics. Furthermore, this paper emphasizes the advantages and disadvantages of NoSQL databases. It illustrates the query languages in both SQL and NoSQL databases and represents the most common uses for each category to help users choose the most convenient DBMS for their organization.","PeriodicalId":7687,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Bulletin of Science","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Bulletin of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/absb.2020.210374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Relational databases are usually used for data storage and retrieval. They are suitable for limited data volume. But when it comes to Bigdata, we need to use more flexible databases that satisfy the need to handle semi-structured and unstructured data. These databases are called NoSQL (Not only SQL) databases. This type of database was developed to interact with data of large volumes. NoSQL databases provide many features such as scalability, availability, replication models, file sharing, and schema-free. This paper’s main purpose is to present a comparative study of the five main categories of NoSQL databases; key-value stores, document stores, column family stores, graph stores databases, and object store NoSQL systems. Also, it discusses the famous database management systems for each one of these five categories. The comparison criteria used are performance, scalability, flexibility, complexity, and functionality. Moreover, this paper presents an overview of big data concepts. It briefly discusses the SQL databases versus NoSQL databases in terms of their high-level characteristics. Furthermore, this paper emphasizes the advantages and disadvantages of NoSQL databases. It illustrates the query languages in both SQL and NoSQL databases and represents the most common uses for each category to help users choose the most convenient DBMS for their organization.
关系数据库通常用于数据存储和检索。它们适用于有限的数据量。但是当涉及到大数据时,我们需要使用更灵活的数据库来满足处理半结构化和非结构化数据的需求。这些数据库被称为NoSQL (Not only SQL)数据库。开发这种类型的数据库是为了与大量数据交互。NoSQL数据库提供了许多特性,如可伸缩性、可用性、复制模型、文件共享和无模式。本文的主要目的是对NoSQL数据库的五大类进行比较研究;键值存储、文档存储、列族存储、图存储数据库和对象存储NoSQL系统。此外,本文还讨论了这五类中著名的数据库管理系统。使用的比较标准是性能、可伸缩性、灵活性、复杂性和功能。此外,本文还概述了大数据的概念。本文简要讨论了SQL数据库与NoSQL数据库的高级特性。此外,本文还强调了NoSQL数据库的优点和缺点。它说明了SQL和NoSQL数据库中的查询语言,并表示了每种查询语言的最常见用途,以帮助用户为其组织选择最方便的DBMS。