Optimal Temporal Gap between Two Different Visual Stimuli for Optimal Perception in Perceptual Decision- Making

Maryam Rafiei, Azra Jahanitabesh, R. Ebrahimpour
{"title":"Optimal Temporal Gap between Two Different Visual Stimuli for Optimal Perception in Perceptual Decision- Making","authors":"Maryam Rafiei, Azra Jahanitabesh, R. Ebrahimpour","doi":"10.52547/shefa.9.4.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We encounter different information or stimuli. However, the combination of these stimuli and the quality of their presentation can influence our perception and decision. Despite the importance of these combined stimuli to our judgments and decisions, it is not yet clear how the characteristics of these stimuli affect the decisionmaking processes. For example, it is not clear whether the time interval between the information we receive can affect the accuracy and speed of decisionmaking. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the time interval between two different visual stimuli on perceptual decisionmaking. Materials and Methods: According to psychophysical experiments, it was possible to measure the response to perceptual stimuli and compare perceptual choices. In a Random Dot Motion (RDM), the task was displayed to the participants as the primary visual stimulus and a graphic cue as the second visual stimulus, at different intervals, and then the participant’s decision accuracy and reaction time to each of these two stimuli were recorded and analyzed. Results: We found that in RDM (primary stimulus), the accuracy of participants’ decisions are not affected by the time interval between the presentation of two stimuli. Instead, the accuracy of the response to the Cue (second visual stimulus) decreases in long time intervals between two stimuli. Interestingly, if two stimuli are presented simultaneously, the decision about each of these stimuli is reasonably accurate; yet, the speed of the decisionmaking process is slower than when a person encounters two stimuli separated by a time interval. Conclusion: The human visual system can distinguish visual stimuli that are presented with a short time interval in between; however, in exchange for correctly identifying these stimuli, the speed of decisionmaking may be slowed down.n Article Info:","PeriodicalId":22899,"journal":{"name":"The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/shefa.9.4.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: We encounter different information or stimuli. However, the combination of these stimuli and the quality of their presentation can influence our perception and decision. Despite the importance of these combined stimuli to our judgments and decisions, it is not yet clear how the characteristics of these stimuli affect the decisionmaking processes. For example, it is not clear whether the time interval between the information we receive can affect the accuracy and speed of decisionmaking. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the time interval between two different visual stimuli on perceptual decisionmaking. Materials and Methods: According to psychophysical experiments, it was possible to measure the response to perceptual stimuli and compare perceptual choices. In a Random Dot Motion (RDM), the task was displayed to the participants as the primary visual stimulus and a graphic cue as the second visual stimulus, at different intervals, and then the participant’s decision accuracy and reaction time to each of these two stimuli were recorded and analyzed. Results: We found that in RDM (primary stimulus), the accuracy of participants’ decisions are not affected by the time interval between the presentation of two stimuli. Instead, the accuracy of the response to the Cue (second visual stimulus) decreases in long time intervals between two stimuli. Interestingly, if two stimuli are presented simultaneously, the decision about each of these stimuli is reasonably accurate; yet, the speed of the decisionmaking process is slower than when a person encounters two stimuli separated by a time interval. Conclusion: The human visual system can distinguish visual stimuli that are presented with a short time interval in between; however, in exchange for correctly identifying these stimuli, the speed of decisionmaking may be slowed down.n Article Info:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知觉决策中两种不同视觉刺激之间的最优时间间隔
我们遇到不同的信息或刺激。然而,这些刺激的组合及其呈现的质量会影响我们的感知和决定。尽管这些综合刺激对我们的判断和决策很重要,但目前还不清楚这些刺激的特征如何影响决策过程。例如,我们接收信息之间的时间间隔是否会影响决策的准确性和速度,目前还不清楚。本研究旨在探讨两种不同视觉刺激之间的时间间隔对知觉决策的影响。材料与方法:通过心理物理实验,测量被试对知觉刺激的反应,比较知觉选择。在随机点运动(Random Dot Motion, RDM)中,以任务作为第一视觉刺激,以图形提示作为第二视觉刺激,以不同的时间间隔向被试展示任务,然后记录和分析被试对这两种刺激的决策准确性和反应时间。结果:我们发现在RDM(主刺激)中,被试的决策准确性不受两个刺激出现的时间间隔的影响。相反,对提示(第二个视觉刺激)的反应准确性在两个刺激之间的长时间间隔内会下降。有趣的是,如果同时出现两种刺激,对每一种刺激的判断都是相当准确的;然而,这个决策过程的速度比一个人在一段时间内遇到两个刺激物时要慢。结论:人的视觉系统能够区分间隔时间较短的视觉刺激;然而,作为正确识别这些刺激的交换,决策的速度可能会减慢。n文章信息:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biomarkers in Brain Traumatic Injury Separation of Healthy Individuals and Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Using the Effective Communication of Brain Signals Comparison of Cold Executive Functions in Gambling Addicts, Drug Addicts, and Normal People Alzheimer's Disease: Narrative Review of Clinical Symptoms, Molecular Alterations, and Effective Physical and Biophysical Methods in its Improvement Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES): History, Theoretical Foundations and Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1