NAGPRA’s Politics of Recognition: Repatriation Struggles of a Terminated Tribe

Courtney Cottrell
{"title":"NAGPRA’s Politics of Recognition: Repatriation Struggles of a Terminated Tribe","authors":"Courtney Cottrell","doi":"10.5250/amerindiquar.44.1.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:What started as a seemingly straightforward consultation request from the Yale Peabody Museum (YPM) to the Brothertown Indian Nation turned into a politics of recognition that relied on the connection between the Federal Acknowledgment Process (FAP) and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The consultation was meant to discuss a pipe that qualified for disposition to the Brother-town, the same pipe that was requested for repatriation by the Mohegan Tribe of Connecticut under NAGPRA. As the tribal historic preservation officer (THPO) for the Brothertown, I was charged with corroborating the historical connection between the Brothertown and the pipe that was established initially by the YPM. Corroborating affiliation of the pipe with the Brothertown was only the first step in a plan to draft our own request for disposition of the pipe. However, along the way, the information gathered was being used in a political game of authenticating Indianness using not only federal standards but also the tribal standards of each of the two Native nations involved. This case study tracks the methodology for making repatriation requests on behalf of a federally unrecognized tribe by outlining the process of gathering historical records to establish affiliation. Broadly, this article explores the precarious nature of petitioning for repatriations on behalf of an unrecognized tribe and how institutions exploit the recognition status of tribes in an effort to maintain control over cultural items.","PeriodicalId":22216,"journal":{"name":"The American Indian Quarterly","volume":"186 1","pages":"59 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Indian Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5250/amerindiquar.44.1.0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:What started as a seemingly straightforward consultation request from the Yale Peabody Museum (YPM) to the Brothertown Indian Nation turned into a politics of recognition that relied on the connection between the Federal Acknowledgment Process (FAP) and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The consultation was meant to discuss a pipe that qualified for disposition to the Brother-town, the same pipe that was requested for repatriation by the Mohegan Tribe of Connecticut under NAGPRA. As the tribal historic preservation officer (THPO) for the Brothertown, I was charged with corroborating the historical connection between the Brothertown and the pipe that was established initially by the YPM. Corroborating affiliation of the pipe with the Brothertown was only the first step in a plan to draft our own request for disposition of the pipe. However, along the way, the information gathered was being used in a political game of authenticating Indianness using not only federal standards but also the tribal standards of each of the two Native nations involved. This case study tracks the methodology for making repatriation requests on behalf of a federally unrecognized tribe by outlining the process of gathering historical records to establish affiliation. Broadly, this article explores the precarious nature of petitioning for repatriations on behalf of an unrecognized tribe and how institutions exploit the recognition status of tribes in an effort to maintain control over cultural items.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NAGPRA的承认政治:一个被终止部落的遣返斗争
摘要:从耶鲁皮博迪博物馆(YPM)向兄弟印第安民族提出的看似简单的咨询请求,演变成一场依赖于联邦承认程序(FAP)和美国原住民坟墓保护与遣返法案(NAGPRA)之间联系的承认政治。磋商的目的是讨论一条有资格处置到兄弟城的管道,这条管道是康涅狄格州莫希干部落根据NAGPRA要求遣返的管道。作为兄弟会的部落历史保护官员(THPO),我负责证实兄弟会和最初由YPM建立的管道之间的历史联系。证实管道与兄弟会的关联只是我们起草处理管道请求计划的第一步。然而,在此过程中,收集到的信息被用于一场政治游戏,即不仅使用联邦标准,还使用两个土著国家各自的部落标准来验证印第安人的身份。本案例研究通过概述收集历史记录以建立从属关系的过程,跟踪了代表联邦不承认的部落提出遣返请求的方法。从广义上讲,本文探讨了代表未被承认的部落请求遣返的不稳定性质,以及机构如何利用部落的被承认地位来努力保持对文化项目的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Doodem and Council Fire: Anishinaabe Governance through Alliance by Heidi Bohaker (review) The Enduring Flame: Stress, Epigenetics, and the California Indian 1769–2000 Strawtown Koteewi: Indiana, NAGPRA, and the Culture of Noncompliance Choctaw Confederates: The American Civil War in Indian Country by Fay A. Yarbrough (review) Native American Rhetoric ed. by Lawrence W. Gross (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1