CO2 Assisted Steam Flooding Technology after Steam Flooding - A Case Study in Block J6 of Xinjiang Oilfield

Xi Changfeng, Qi Zongyao, Liu Tong, Z. Yunjun, Zhao Fang, Qingsen Yu, D. Shen, Li Xiuluan
{"title":"CO2 Assisted Steam Flooding Technology after Steam Flooding - A Case Study in Block J6 of Xinjiang Oilfield","authors":"Xi Changfeng, Qi Zongyao, Liu Tong, Z. Yunjun, Zhao Fang, Qingsen Yu, D. Shen, Li Xiuluan","doi":"10.2118/196767-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Currently Block J6 is in the later stage of steam flooding after 27 years’ steam injection, its recovery factor is about 50%, and the water cut is more than 95%. Particularly, the present steam oil ratio is about 12 m3(CWE)/t which has reached the economic limit and is in ineffective development. Cores from four post steam flooding drilling wells show that only top 2-3m of the total 25-30m pay zone has a steam chamber which is the main steam channel and its residual oil saturation is about 20%, the other 22-27m pay zone is displaced by hot water and its oil saturation is 40-55%. A 3D physical simulation show the conventional steam flooding with full interval perforation quickly broke through from the top of reservoir, and the steam oil ratio rose rapidly from 5 m3(CWE)/t to 10 m3(CWE)/t. The recovery factor was only 20.1% at the time of steam breakthrough, and then it was in the phase of high steam oil ratio for a long time. During CO2 assisted steam flooding the whole perforated producer is switched into a low half perforated well, and the recovery factor increases from 20.1% to 81.1%, the steam oil ratio is 3.3m3(CWE)/t. There are three characteristics in CO2 assisted steam flooding stage, firstly there is a steam and CO2 assisted gravity drainage mode, steam chamber expands from the top 2-3cm to the total 20cm oil layer. Secondly, there is a stable emulsion foam oil, its water cut is 60-70%, CO2 liquid ratio is about 5:1 Sm3/t, CO2 is a kind of dispersed bubble so it is much more than the dissolved CO2 liquid ratio 2:1 Sm3/t. Thirdly, CO2 lows the heatloss to overburden and keeps the formation pressure. The calculation shows that the heat loss can be reduced by more than 10% in the top layer. A pilot test including 9 well patterns(49 wells) has been established, and its recovery factor will be up to 75%, and the steam oil ratio will up to 2 m3(CWE)/t, a good production performance is predicted optimistically.","PeriodicalId":10977,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196767-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Currently Block J6 is in the later stage of steam flooding after 27 years’ steam injection, its recovery factor is about 50%, and the water cut is more than 95%. Particularly, the present steam oil ratio is about 12 m3(CWE)/t which has reached the economic limit and is in ineffective development. Cores from four post steam flooding drilling wells show that only top 2-3m of the total 25-30m pay zone has a steam chamber which is the main steam channel and its residual oil saturation is about 20%, the other 22-27m pay zone is displaced by hot water and its oil saturation is 40-55%. A 3D physical simulation show the conventional steam flooding with full interval perforation quickly broke through from the top of reservoir, and the steam oil ratio rose rapidly from 5 m3(CWE)/t to 10 m3(CWE)/t. The recovery factor was only 20.1% at the time of steam breakthrough, and then it was in the phase of high steam oil ratio for a long time. During CO2 assisted steam flooding the whole perforated producer is switched into a low half perforated well, and the recovery factor increases from 20.1% to 81.1%, the steam oil ratio is 3.3m3(CWE)/t. There are three characteristics in CO2 assisted steam flooding stage, firstly there is a steam and CO2 assisted gravity drainage mode, steam chamber expands from the top 2-3cm to the total 20cm oil layer. Secondly, there is a stable emulsion foam oil, its water cut is 60-70%, CO2 liquid ratio is about 5:1 Sm3/t, CO2 is a kind of dispersed bubble so it is much more than the dissolved CO2 liquid ratio 2:1 Sm3/t. Thirdly, CO2 lows the heatloss to overburden and keeps the formation pressure. The calculation shows that the heat loss can be reduced by more than 10% in the top layer. A pilot test including 9 well patterns(49 wells) has been established, and its recovery factor will be up to 75%, and the steam oil ratio will up to 2 m3(CWE)/t, a good production performance is predicted optimistically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒸汽驱后CO2辅助蒸汽驱技术——以新疆油田J6区块为例
J6区块注汽27年,目前处于蒸汽驱后期,采收率约为50%,含水率在95%以上。特别是目前的汽油比约为12 m3 /t,已达到经济极限,开发效果不佳。蒸汽驱后4口井的岩心显示,在25 ~ 30m的产层中,只有顶部2 ~ 3m有蒸汽室,为主蒸汽通道,残余油饱和度约为20%,其余22 ~ 27m产层为热水驱替,含油饱和度为40 ~ 55%。三维物理模拟结果表明,常规蒸汽驱全段射孔从储层顶部迅速突破,汽油比从5 m3 /t迅速上升到10 m3 /t。蒸汽突破时采收率仅为20.1%,此后长期处于高汽油比阶段。在CO2辅助蒸汽驱过程中,将整口射孔采油井改为低半射孔井,采收率由20.1%提高到81.1%,汽油比为3.3m3 /t。CO2辅助蒸汽驱阶段有三个特点:一是蒸汽- CO2辅助重力泄油模式,蒸汽室从顶部2-3cm扩展到总20cm油层;其次,有一种稳定的乳化液泡沫油,其含水率为60-70%,CO2液比约为5:1 Sm3/t, CO2是一种分散的气泡,所以它的溶解性CO2液比远远大于2:1 Sm3/t。第三,CO2降低了覆盖层的热损失,保持了地层压力。计算表明,在顶层可使热损失降低10%以上。建立了9口井模式(49口井)的中试,采收率可达75%,汽油比可达2 m3 /t,乐观预测生产效果良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Practical Application of the Fluorescent Microspheres Method Technology in Horizontal Wells of the Upper Salym Oil Field: Efficiency of the Method, Technology and Approach Evolution of Horizontal Wells Production Logging Using Markers Successful Implementation of Managed Pressure Drilling Technology Under the Conditions of Catastrophic Mud Losses in the Kuyumbinskoe Field Completion Design Optimization for Unconventional Wells Using Large Scale Computational Science Assessing Efficiency of Multiwell Retrospective Testing MRT in Analysis of Cross-Well Interference and Prediction of Formation and Bottom- Hole Pressure Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1