Terapêutica com surfactante em recém-nascidos prematuros: tendência para uma abordagem menos invasiva

Daniel Meireles, Luísa Neiva Araújo, Marta Nascimento, L. Pinho, A. C. Freitas, A. Almeida, Cármen Carvalho, E. Proença
{"title":"Terapêutica com surfactante em recém-nascidos prematuros: tendência para uma abordagem menos invasiva","authors":"Daniel Meireles, Luísa Neiva Araújo, Marta Nascimento, L. Pinho, A. C. Freitas, A. Almeida, Cármen Carvalho, E. Proença","doi":"10.25753/BIRTHGROWTHMJ.V30.I1.19182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) is a surfactant administration procedure that intends to reduce intubations and associated risks. The aim of this study was to compare MIST with INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation (INSURE) technique. \nMaterial and methods: Retrospective analysis (from January 2015 to June 2019) of preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) treated with surfactant.\nResults: Fifty-four preterm infants were included and divided in two groups: MIST (n=34) and INSURE (n=20). No significant differences were found between groups regarding gestational age (p=0.480), birth weight (p=0.299), fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) prior to surfactant (p=0.220), oxygen therapy duration (p=0.306), progression to intubation (p=0.712), or length of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit stay (p=0.778). FiO2 variation before and after surfactant administration was higher in MIST group (14% vs 9%, p=0.078). No significant complications were reported with either technique.\nConclusions: MIST is a safe technique in preterm infants on nCPAP. This study shows similar outcomes with MIST and INSURE procedures, with a greater reduction in FiO2 requirements with MIST. Overall, MIST is less invasive and as effective as INSURE in preterm infants.","PeriodicalId":31313,"journal":{"name":"Nascer e Crescer","volume":"210 1","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nascer e Crescer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25753/BIRTHGROWTHMJ.V30.I1.19182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) is a surfactant administration procedure that intends to reduce intubations and associated risks. The aim of this study was to compare MIST with INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation (INSURE) technique. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis (from January 2015 to June 2019) of preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) treated with surfactant. Results: Fifty-four preterm infants were included and divided in two groups: MIST (n=34) and INSURE (n=20). No significant differences were found between groups regarding gestational age (p=0.480), birth weight (p=0.299), fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) prior to surfactant (p=0.220), oxygen therapy duration (p=0.306), progression to intubation (p=0.712), or length of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit stay (p=0.778). FiO2 variation before and after surfactant administration was higher in MIST group (14% vs 9%, p=0.078). No significant complications were reported with either technique. Conclusions: MIST is a safe technique in preterm infants on nCPAP. This study shows similar outcomes with MIST and INSURE procedures, with a greater reduction in FiO2 requirements with MIST. Overall, MIST is less invasive and as effective as INSURE in preterm infants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表面活性剂治疗早产儿:微创方法的趋势
微创表面活性剂治疗(MIST)是一种表面活性剂给药程序,旨在减少插管和相关风险。本研究的目的是比较MIST与插管-表面活性剂-拔管(INSURE)技术。材料与方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年6月接受表面活性剂鼻腔持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)治疗的早产儿。结果:纳入54例早产儿,分为MIST组(n=34)和INSURE组(n=20)。两组间在胎龄(p=0.480)、出生体重(p=0.299)、表面活性物质使用前吸入氧(FiO2)比例(p=0.220)、氧治疗持续时间(p=0.306)、插管进展(p=0.712)或新生儿重症监护病房住院时间(p=0.778)方面无显著差异。表面活性剂给药前后,MIST组FiO2变化较高(14% vs 9%, p=0.078)。两种方法均无明显并发症。结论:MIST是一种安全的早产儿nCPAP技术。该研究表明,MIST和INSURE的结果相似,MIST更能降低FiO2要求。总的来说,在早产儿中,MIST的侵入性较小,与INSURE一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Science as a Guarantee of Civilizational Development: Vaccines as the safest and most effective way to prevent disease and save lives Children and teens moving towards mental health After pediatric stroke, it’s time to enable! Weight loss as a cause of superior mesenteric artery syndrome Lesão no couro cabeludo de um recém-nascido
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1