Current Status of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification by CT and MR

T. Mochizuki
{"title":"Current Status of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification by CT and MR","authors":"T. Mochizuki","doi":"10.17996/anc.19-00109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n this issue of the Annals of Nuclear Cardiology, there are two review articles related to myocardial blood flow assessment (MBF; ml/g-myocardium/min). One is using dynamic perfusion CT by Manabe et al., and the other is using dynamic perfusion MR by Ichikawa et al. (1, 2). MBF measurement has been mainly performed by dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 13 N-NH3, 15 O-H2O, and 82 Rb (3, 4). PET MBF assessment is a gold standard for non-invasive quantification of MBF, however, there are limited number of facilities where dynamic perfusion PET can be available in the clinical settings. Recently, there are trials to quantify MBF using semi-conductor detector single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (5) and the PET MBF quantification methodology using 99m Tc-MIBI, 99m Tctetrofosmin or 201 Tl-TlCl. In addition to the limited number of facilities where semi-conductor or high sensitivity SPECT systems are installed, there are limitations of SPECT MBF quantification such as underestimation and accuracy when using 99m Tc-agents, and low counts or noisy data. If non-invasive MBF assessment is available with widely used modalities such as CT and MR, it would be of beneficial for many coronary artery disease (CAD) patients in the clinical setting.","PeriodicalId":72228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.19-00109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I n this issue of the Annals of Nuclear Cardiology, there are two review articles related to myocardial blood flow assessment (MBF; ml/g-myocardium/min). One is using dynamic perfusion CT by Manabe et al., and the other is using dynamic perfusion MR by Ichikawa et al. (1, 2). MBF measurement has been mainly performed by dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 13 N-NH3, 15 O-H2O, and 82 Rb (3, 4). PET MBF assessment is a gold standard for non-invasive quantification of MBF, however, there are limited number of facilities where dynamic perfusion PET can be available in the clinical settings. Recently, there are trials to quantify MBF using semi-conductor detector single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (5) and the PET MBF quantification methodology using 99m Tc-MIBI, 99m Tctetrofosmin or 201 Tl-TlCl. In addition to the limited number of facilities where semi-conductor or high sensitivity SPECT systems are installed, there are limitations of SPECT MBF quantification such as underestimation and accuracy when using 99m Tc-agents, and low counts or noisy data. If non-invasive MBF assessment is available with widely used modalities such as CT and MR, it would be of beneficial for many coronary artery disease (CAD) patients in the clinical setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CT和MR定量心肌血流量的现状
在本期《核心脏病学年鉴》上,有两篇关于心肌血流量评估(MBF;毫升/ g-myocardium /分钟)。一种是Manabe等人使用的动态灌注CT,另一种是Ichikawa等人使用的动态灌注MR(1,2)。MBF测量主要是通过动态正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像(含13个N-NH3、15个O-H2O和82个Rb)进行的(3,4)。PET MBF评估是MBF无创量化的金标准,然而,在临床环境中可以使用动态灌注PET的设施数量有限。最近,有使用半导体探测器单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)(5)和使用99m Tc-MIBI, 99m Tctetrofosmin或201 Tl-TlCl的PET MBF量化方法的试验。除了安装半导体或高灵敏度SPECT系统的设施数量有限之外,SPECT MBF定量也存在局限性,例如使用99m tc试剂时的低估和准确性,以及计数低或有噪声的数据。如果非侵入性MBF评估可以通过广泛使用的方式,如CT和MR,它将有利于许多冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的临床设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Myocardial Strain Derived from 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography: Detection of Ischemia-Related Wall Motion Abnormality. Phantom-Based Standardization Method for 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio Validated by D-SPECT Versus Anger Camera. Modified Algorithm Using Total Count for Calculating Myocardial Washout Rate in Single-Photon Emission Computerized Tomography. The Application of Conditional Probability to Harmonize Nuclear Cardiology Test Results. Validation of a Five-Year Prognostic Model Using 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy in Patients with Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1