Which drugs of choice are on the rise or in decline? A trend analysis of Belgium’s treatment settings (2015-2019)

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Drugs, habits and social policy Pub Date : 2022-08-26 DOI:10.1108/dhs-10-2021-0055
J. Antoine, Michaël Hogge, Else De Donder, Geert Verstuyf, E. Plettinckx, L. Gremeaux
{"title":"Which drugs of choice are on the rise or in decline? A trend analysis of Belgium’s treatment settings (2015-2019)","authors":"J. Antoine, Michaël Hogge, Else De Donder, Geert Verstuyf, E. Plettinckx, L. Gremeaux","doi":"10.1108/dhs-10-2021-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe opioid epidemic in the USA, the new psychoactive substances emerging on the market and the recent increase in cocaine treatment demands in Western Europe, all emphasise the importance of monitoring the use and harms of drugs over time. To be informed about new consumption patterns, this study aims to study the trends among people entering treatment for substance use in Belgium.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBelgian data from the Treatment Demand Indicator collected between 2015 and 2019 were used. A reference group of treatment units was selected to allow for comparisons between the different years. Trend analysis was performed by using a joinpoint regression among different regions and groups of clients.\n\n\nFindings\nThe drugs of choice that were most frequently mentioned among the 23,000 analysed treatment episodes were alcohol and cannabis. Both remained relatively stable over time. Heroin seemed to be decreasing significantly at the national level, but increased in Brussels. Benzodiazepines decreased significantly in Flanders and Brussels, but not in Wallonia. On the other hand, reports of crack cocaine increased significantly in the three regions with a more pronounced trend in Wallonia and Brussels. Substances such as fentanyl, methamphetamine, ketamine or volatile inhalants have been mentioned significantly more by people entering treatment in 2019, although their contribution to the total number is still limited.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate trends for all drugs of choice at a national and regional level. These results might not only benefit national policymakers but also other countries with similar alcohol or drug use patterns.\n","PeriodicalId":72849,"journal":{"name":"Drugs, habits and social policy","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs, habits and social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dhs-10-2021-0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The opioid epidemic in the USA, the new psychoactive substances emerging on the market and the recent increase in cocaine treatment demands in Western Europe, all emphasise the importance of monitoring the use and harms of drugs over time. To be informed about new consumption patterns, this study aims to study the trends among people entering treatment for substance use in Belgium. Design/methodology/approach Belgian data from the Treatment Demand Indicator collected between 2015 and 2019 were used. A reference group of treatment units was selected to allow for comparisons between the different years. Trend analysis was performed by using a joinpoint regression among different regions and groups of clients. Findings The drugs of choice that were most frequently mentioned among the 23,000 analysed treatment episodes were alcohol and cannabis. Both remained relatively stable over time. Heroin seemed to be decreasing significantly at the national level, but increased in Brussels. Benzodiazepines decreased significantly in Flanders and Brussels, but not in Wallonia. On the other hand, reports of crack cocaine increased significantly in the three regions with a more pronounced trend in Wallonia and Brussels. Substances such as fentanyl, methamphetamine, ketamine or volatile inhalants have been mentioned significantly more by people entering treatment in 2019, although their contribution to the total number is still limited. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate trends for all drugs of choice at a national and regional level. These results might not only benefit national policymakers but also other countries with similar alcohol or drug use patterns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪些药物的选择是上升的还是下降的?比利时治疗环境趋势分析(2015-2019)
目的:美国的阿片类药物流行、市场上新出现的精神活性物质以及西欧最近可卡因治疗需求的增加,都强调了长期监测药物使用和危害的重要性。为了了解新的消费模式,本研究旨在研究比利时进入药物使用治疗的人的趋势。设计/方法/方法使用了2015年至2019年期间收集的比利时治疗需求指标数据。选择一个治疗单位的参照组,以便在不同年份之间进行比较。趋势分析是通过在不同地区和客户群体之间使用联结点回归进行的。在分析的23000次治疗中,提到最多的药物是酒精和大麻。随着时间的推移,两者都保持相对稳定。海洛因在国家一级似乎正在显著减少,但在布鲁塞尔却有所增加。苯二氮卓类药物在佛兰德斯和布鲁塞尔显著减少,但在瓦隆尼亚没有。另一方面,有关快克可卡因的报告在这三个地区显著增加,其中瓦隆尼亚和布鲁塞尔的趋势更为明显。芬太尼、甲基苯丙胺、氯胺酮或挥发性吸入剂等物质在2019年接受治疗的人群中被提及的次数明显增加,尽管它们对总数的贡献仍然有限。原创性/价值据作者所知,这项研究是第一个在国家和地区层面评估所有药物选择趋势的研究。这些结果可能不仅有利于国家决策者,也有利于具有类似酒精或药物使用模式的其他国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural variations in conceptualization of excessive drinking among young adults in Denmark, Estonia and Italy Pandemic-related changes in alcohol use among LGB+ people with and without mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions: a multinational cross-sectional study Implications of legalisation of cannabis cultivation in Ghana: a critical review Family ties: examining family functioning and alcohol use among American Indian youth Ayahuasca ceremonies: set and setting features across Italy and Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1