Expression of VEGF and its receptors Flt and KDR in gastric cancer

Dong-Ping Liu, Bingyuan Wang, Ruolan Jiang
{"title":"Expression of VEGF and its receptors Flt and KDR in gastric cancer","authors":"Dong-Ping Liu, Bingyuan Wang, Ruolan Jiang","doi":"10.1046/J.1443-9573.2001.00032.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the correlation between the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), the expression of its receptors, Flt and KDR, and the biological behavior of gastric cancer. \n \n \n \nMETHODS: Sixty cases of gastric cancer that had been diagnosed by surgery and pathology were studied with the method of semiquantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), to determine the expression of VEGF, Flt and KDR in gastric cancer tissue. \n \n \n \nRESULTS: The positive rates of VEGF, Flt and KDR in gastric cancer were 73.3, 86.7 and 80.0%, respectively. In pericancerous tissue, the rates were 43.3, 33.0 and 30.0%, respectively. There were significant differences between the groups with and without lymph node metastasis (P < 0.01). For gastric cancer patients with lymphatic metastasis, the positive rates for VEGF, Flt and KDR were 90.3, 80.6 and 96.8%, respectively; for patients without lymphatic metastasis, the rates were 51.7, 41.3 and 55.1%; there were significant differences between the groups with and without lymph node metastasis (P < 0.01). The positive rates of VEGF and KDR in well-differentiated gastric cancer were 40.0 and 46.7%, markedly lower than those of the poorly differentiated and undifferentiated gastric cancer groups. The rate of positive expression of Flt in the well-differentiated gastric cancer group was 73.3%. There was no significant difference between this rate and that of the poorly differentiated and undifferentiated groups (87.5%). The positive expression of VEGF, Flt and KDR was unrelated to the depth of infiltration. \n \n \n \nCONCLUSIONS: There are some correlations between VEGF, Flt and KDR and the biological behavior of gastric cancer. Knowing where they are expressed at high rates may be of help in evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.","PeriodicalId":10082,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of digestive diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of digestive diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1443-9573.2001.00032.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the correlation between the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), the expression of its receptors, Flt and KDR, and the biological behavior of gastric cancer. METHODS: Sixty cases of gastric cancer that had been diagnosed by surgery and pathology were studied with the method of semiquantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), to determine the expression of VEGF, Flt and KDR in gastric cancer tissue. RESULTS: The positive rates of VEGF, Flt and KDR in gastric cancer were 73.3, 86.7 and 80.0%, respectively. In pericancerous tissue, the rates were 43.3, 33.0 and 30.0%, respectively. There were significant differences between the groups with and without lymph node metastasis (P < 0.01). For gastric cancer patients with lymphatic metastasis, the positive rates for VEGF, Flt and KDR were 90.3, 80.6 and 96.8%, respectively; for patients without lymphatic metastasis, the rates were 51.7, 41.3 and 55.1%; there were significant differences between the groups with and without lymph node metastasis (P < 0.01). The positive rates of VEGF and KDR in well-differentiated gastric cancer were 40.0 and 46.7%, markedly lower than those of the poorly differentiated and undifferentiated gastric cancer groups. The rate of positive expression of Flt in the well-differentiated gastric cancer group was 73.3%. There was no significant difference between this rate and that of the poorly differentiated and undifferentiated groups (87.5%). The positive expression of VEGF, Flt and KDR was unrelated to the depth of infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: There are some correlations between VEGF, Flt and KDR and the biological behavior of gastric cancer. Knowing where they are expressed at high rates may be of help in evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VEGF及其受体Flt和KDR在胃癌中的表达
目的:探讨血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)及其受体、Flt和KDR的表达与胃癌生物学行为的相关性。方法:采用半定量逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)方法对60例经手术及病理诊断的胃癌患者进行研究,检测胃癌组织中VEGF、Flt、KDR的表达。结果:胃癌组织中VEGF、Flt和KDR的阳性率分别为73.3%、86.7%和80.0%。在癌周组织中,发生率分别为43.3%、33.0%和30.0%。有无淋巴结转移组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。胃癌淋巴转移患者VEGF、Flt和KDR阳性率分别为90.3%、80.6%和96.8%;无淋巴转移的患者分别为51.7、41.3和55.1%;有无淋巴结转移组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。VEGF和KDR在高分化胃癌中的阳性率分别为40.0%和46.7%,明显低于低分化和未分化胃癌组。Flt在高分化胃癌组的阳性表达率为73.3%。该比率与低分化组和未分化组(87.5%)无显著差异。VEGF、Flt、KDR的阳性表达与浸润深度无关。结论:VEGF、Flt、KDR与胃癌生物学行为存在一定的相关性。了解它们高表达的位置可能有助于评估胃癌的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prospective randomized clinical trial of two drug delivery pathway in the treatment of inoperable advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Meta-analysis of inoperable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine combined with cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone. Prevalence and risk factors of Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy schoolchildren. Association of peptic ulcer with increased expression of Lewis antigens, but not vacuolating cytotoxin activity or babA2 gene status, in Helicobacter pylori strains from China. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging of gastric cancer in routine clinical practice in Singapore.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1