Empowering Indigenous Peoples through Self-Government: Progress and Challenges

IF 0.7 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/13537113.2022.2060363
A. Chater
{"title":"Empowering Indigenous Peoples through Self-Government: Progress and Challenges","authors":"A. Chater","doi":"10.1080/13537113.2022.2060363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The story of Indigenous peoples and the government of Canada in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is one of treaty violations, occupation of unceded territory, genocide, and discrimination by settlers. Progress has been immense over the last 50 years. The government of Pierre Trudeau’s 1969 White Paper called for the end of Indian Status and the Indian Act; only four years later, the Calder case recognized historical Indigenous land rights in a profound way. Nine years on, Indigenous rights were entrenched in Canada’s constitution. The strengthening of Indian status and historic land claim agreements followed. No doubt activism on the part of Indigenous peoples is a key explanatory variable. The 1970s and 1980s saw new recognition of human rights, equality, and the right to self-determination in the domestic context after the dismantling of legal segregation in North America as well as the creation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Still, this story is not (yet?) one that has a happy ending. Some Indigenous peoples have land claim agreements, while such autonomy remains elusive elsewhere; other groups have self-government agreements, while certain negotiations have dragged on for decades. Several Indigenous governments are powerful and effective, while others find themselves subservient to colonial powers on their own lands. There are commentators who laud the fact that funding for Indigenous services in Canada has increased, yet the standard of living for Indigenous peoples is still less on average compared to non-Indigenous Canadians. The four","PeriodicalId":45342,"journal":{"name":"Nationalism and Ethnic Politics","volume":"103 1","pages":"232 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nationalism and Ethnic Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2022.2060363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The story of Indigenous peoples and the government of Canada in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is one of treaty violations, occupation of unceded territory, genocide, and discrimination by settlers. Progress has been immense over the last 50 years. The government of Pierre Trudeau’s 1969 White Paper called for the end of Indian Status and the Indian Act; only four years later, the Calder case recognized historical Indigenous land rights in a profound way. Nine years on, Indigenous rights were entrenched in Canada’s constitution. The strengthening of Indian status and historic land claim agreements followed. No doubt activism on the part of Indigenous peoples is a key explanatory variable. The 1970s and 1980s saw new recognition of human rights, equality, and the right to self-determination in the domestic context after the dismantling of legal segregation in North America as well as the creation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Still, this story is not (yet?) one that has a happy ending. Some Indigenous peoples have land claim agreements, while such autonomy remains elusive elsewhere; other groups have self-government agreements, while certain negotiations have dragged on for decades. Several Indigenous governments are powerful and effective, while others find themselves subservient to colonial powers on their own lands. There are commentators who laud the fact that funding for Indigenous services in Canada has increased, yet the standard of living for Indigenous peoples is still less on average compared to non-Indigenous Canadians. The four
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过自治赋予土著人民权力:进展与挑战
土著人民和加拿大政府在19世纪和20世纪的故事是一个违反条约、占领未割让领土、种族灭绝和移民歧视的故事。在过去的50年里取得了巨大的进步。皮埃尔·特鲁多(Pierre Trudeau)政府在1969年的白皮书中呼吁结束印第安人地位和印第安人法案;仅仅四年后,考尔德案就以一种深刻的方式承认了历史上原住民的土地权利。9年过去了,原住民的权利在加拿大宪法中得到确立。随后加强了印第安人的地位和历史性的土地要求协议。毫无疑问,土著人民的行动主义是一个关键的解释变量。20世纪70年代和80年代,在北美废除了法律上的种族隔离以及制定了《加拿大权利和自由宪章》之后,在国内范围内重新承认了人权、平等和自决权。不过,这个故事(还不是?)还没有一个圆满的结局。一些土著人民有土地要求协议,而这种自治在其他地方仍然难以实现;其他团体有自治协议,而某些谈判已经拖了几十年。一些土著政府是强大而有效的,而另一些则发现自己在自己的土地上屈从于殖民列强。有评论员称赞加拿大对土著服务的资助有所增加,但土著人民的平均生活水平仍然低于非土著加拿大人。这四个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Nationalism & Ethnic Politics explores the varied political aspects of nationalism and ethnicity in order to develop more constructive inter-group relations. The journal publishes case studies and comparative and theoretical analyses. It deals with pluralism, ethno-nationalism, irredentism, separatism, and related phenomena, and examines processes and theories of ethnic identity formation, mobilization, conflict and accommodation in the context of political development and "nation-building". The journal compares and contrasts state and community claims, and deal with such factors as citizenship, race, religion, economic development, immigration, language, and the international environment.
期刊最新文献
Local Ethnic Demography and Ethnonationalist Voting: Evidence from Interwar Yugoslavia The British and Irish Governments’ Role in Restoring the Assembly in Northern Ireland: October 2002 to May 2007 and January 2017 to January 2020 Policing Race, Ethnicity and Culture: Ethnographic Perspectives across Europe Defensive Nationalism: Explaining the Rise of Populism and Fascism in the 21 st Century Collective Equality: Human Rights and Democracy in Ethno-National Conflicts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1