L’impact du regret et de la réjouissance sur l’allocation d’actifs risqués

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.3917/REDP.284.0613
Franck Bien, Thomas Lanzi
{"title":"L’impact du regret et de la réjouissance sur l’allocation d’actifs risqués","authors":"Franck Bien, Thomas Lanzi","doi":"10.3917/REDP.284.0613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we propose to analyze the impact of regret and rejoicing on the allocation of risky assets. Regret and rejoicing are two emotions that are defined by comparing the result of an action retained by an agent with respect to the result that he could have obtained from an alternative action. We show that the choice of the alternative action impacts the allocation of risky assets. When it is defined in relation to the ex post maximum expected result, the agent only receives regret. This may lead, for low values of the marginal cost of risk, to retain more risky assets than an agent who maximized a standard expected utility function. On the contrary, the agent could express a preference for certainty and defines his emotions in relation to what a total investment in risk-free assets would bring to him. In this case, we show that investment in risky assets is weaker than the one realized by an agent who maximized a standard expected utility function.","PeriodicalId":44798,"journal":{"name":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","volume":"5 1","pages":"613-639"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/REDP.284.0613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, we propose to analyze the impact of regret and rejoicing on the allocation of risky assets. Regret and rejoicing are two emotions that are defined by comparing the result of an action retained by an agent with respect to the result that he could have obtained from an alternative action. We show that the choice of the alternative action impacts the allocation of risky assets. When it is defined in relation to the ex post maximum expected result, the agent only receives regret. This may lead, for low values of the marginal cost of risk, to retain more risky assets than an agent who maximized a standard expected utility function. On the contrary, the agent could express a preference for certainty and defines his emotions in relation to what a total investment in risk-free assets would bring to him. In this case, we show that investment in risky assets is weaker than the one realized by an agent who maximized a standard expected utility function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗憾和高兴对风险资产配置的影响
在本文中,我们建议分析后悔和欣喜对风险资产配置的影响。遗憾和高兴是两种情绪,它们是通过比较一个行为的结果和他从另一个行为中可能获得的结果来定义的。我们证明了替代行为的选择会影响风险资产的配置。当它与事后最大期望结果相关时,代理只收到遗憾。这可能导致,在边际风险成本较低的情况下,比使标准期望效用函数最大化的代理人保留更多的风险资产。相反,代理人可以表达对确定性的偏好,并根据对无风险资产的总投资将给他带来什么来定义他的情绪。在这种情况下,我们证明了对风险资产的投资弱于代理人最大化标准期望效用函数所实现的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Monetary Policy with Weakened Unions American Protectionism On the Historical Foundation of Women’s Self-Employment in Africa Testing for the Imports-Led Growth and the Growth-Led Imports Hypotheses in Panels for the Small Island World Mehrdad Vahabi, Destructive Coordination, Anfal and Islamic Political Capitalism. New Reading of Contemporary Iran , Palgrave-Macmillan, 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1