The role of architects in initiating, sustaining and defending urban commons in mass housing estates: R-Urban in Grand Ensembles

IF 0.3 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13602365.2023.2183619
D. Petrescu, Constantin Petcou
{"title":"The role of architects in initiating, sustaining and defending urban commons in mass housing estates: R-Urban in Grand Ensembles","authors":"D. Petrescu, Constantin Petcou","doi":"10.1080/13602365.2023.2183619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses aspects concerning the emergence of urban commons in mass housing estates in France. At a critical moment of societal crisis due to resources depletion and planetary Climate Change, urban commons can contribute and offer solutions to the complex process of transition towards more resilient forms of governance at different scales. In the context of mass housing estates built five decades ago, enabling the emergence of commons can be a resilient alternative to the current urban regeneration approaches. This process needs agencies and actors, and architects can play an important role. In order to provide an example in this sense, we take the case of R-Urban, a project initiated by atelier d'architecture autogérée as a commons-based network of civic resilience implemented in Parisian suburbs. The network consists of resilience hubs located in mass housing estates, which are collectively managed by inhabitants. The hubs function as forms of urban commons, constituting an alternative to the publicly funded équipments collectifs of the Grand Ensembles, the major mass housing program of a welfare government that started in the late 1950s and 1960s. As opposed to these équipments, the R-Urban hubs are self-managed, being run and funded mainly with civic contribution. The architects are not anymore top-down experts commissioned by the State, but have successively acted as initiators, designers, and co-managers of the project, sustaining the emergence of those urban commons through diverse local alliances. However, in a political context in which the welfare principles have been replaced by market principles (often sustained by the State), keeping this role for architects is a challenge.","PeriodicalId":44236,"journal":{"name":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2023.2183619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses aspects concerning the emergence of urban commons in mass housing estates in France. At a critical moment of societal crisis due to resources depletion and planetary Climate Change, urban commons can contribute and offer solutions to the complex process of transition towards more resilient forms of governance at different scales. In the context of mass housing estates built five decades ago, enabling the emergence of commons can be a resilient alternative to the current urban regeneration approaches. This process needs agencies and actors, and architects can play an important role. In order to provide an example in this sense, we take the case of R-Urban, a project initiated by atelier d'architecture autogérée as a commons-based network of civic resilience implemented in Parisian suburbs. The network consists of resilience hubs located in mass housing estates, which are collectively managed by inhabitants. The hubs function as forms of urban commons, constituting an alternative to the publicly funded équipments collectifs of the Grand Ensembles, the major mass housing program of a welfare government that started in the late 1950s and 1960s. As opposed to these équipments, the R-Urban hubs are self-managed, being run and funded mainly with civic contribution. The architects are not anymore top-down experts commissioned by the State, but have successively acted as initiators, designers, and co-managers of the project, sustaining the emergence of those urban commons through diverse local alliances. However, in a political context in which the welfare principles have been replaced by market principles (often sustained by the State), keeping this role for architects is a challenge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑师在大规模住宅小区中发起、维持和捍卫城市公地的角色:R-Urban在Grand Ensembles中的作用
本文论述了法国大规模住宅小区中城市公地的出现。在资源枯竭和全球气候变化导致社会危机的关键时刻,城市公地可以为向不同规模的更具弹性的治理形式过渡的复杂过程做出贡献并提供解决方案。在50年前建造的大规模住宅区的背景下,实现公地的出现可以成为当前城市更新方法的一个有弹性的替代方案。这个过程需要代理机构和参与者,建筑师可以发挥重要作用。为了在这个意义上提供一个例子,我们以R-Urban为例,这是一个由atelier d'architecture autog )发起的项目,它是一个在巴黎郊区实施的基于公共基础的公民弹性网络。该网络由位于大规模住宅区的弹性中心组成,由居民集体管理。这些中心作为城市公共场所的一种形式,构成了公共资助的“大合奏团”(Grand Ensembles)的设备集合体的另一种选择。“大合奏团”是始于20世纪50年代末和60年代的福利政府的主要大众住房项目。与这些设备相反,R-Urban中心是自我管理的,主要由公民捐款运营和资助。建筑师不再是国家委托的自上而下的专家,而是先后担任项目的发起人、设计师和共同管理者,通过不同的地方联盟来维持这些城市公地的出现。然而,在福利原则被市场原则所取代的政治背景下(通常由国家维持),保持建筑师的角色是一个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: METU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE is a biannual refereed publication of the Middle East Technical University published every June and December, and offers a comprehensive range of articles contributing to the development of knowledge in man-environment relations, design and planning. METU JFA accepts submissions in English or Turkish, and assumes that the manuscripts received by the Journal have not been published previously or that are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Editorial Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. METU JFA invites theory, research and history papers on the following fields and related interdisciplinary topics: architecture and urbanism, planning and design, restoration and preservation, buildings and building systems technologies and design, product design and technologies. Prospective manuscripts for publication in these fields may constitute; 1. Original theoretical papers; 2. Original research papers; 3. Documents and critical expositions; 4. Applied studies related to professional practice; 5. Educational works, commentaries and reviews; 6. Book reviews Manuscripts, in English or Turkish, have to be approved by the Editorial Board, which are then forwarded to Referees before acceptance for publication. The Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. It is assumed that the manuscripts received by the Journal are not sent to other journals for publication purposes and have not been previously published elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
TRACING THE EMERGENCE OF A PERIPHERAL WATERFRONT NEIGHBORHOOD IN ISTAVROZBEYLERBEYI ON THE BOSPHORUS SHORES (1760-1805) Un-building: a utopia of receding construction Striving for a new monumentality: the non-classical influence on Gunnar Asplund’s architecture ‘The germ of future extension and perpetuity’: capitalism and the Peabody Trust RESTRUCTURING AND NEW SPATIAL TENDENCIES IN ANKARA FURNITURE SECTOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1