Reconsidering social movement impact on democracy: the case of Spain’s 15-M movement

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Social Movement Studies Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1080/14742837.2023.2190090
Cristina Flesher Fominaya, Ramón A. Feenstra
{"title":"Reconsidering social movement impact on democracy: the case of Spain’s 15-M movement","authors":"Cristina Flesher Fominaya, Ramón A. Feenstra","doi":"10.1080/14742837.2023.2190090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social movement impact on democracy has primarily been treated in two ways in the literature: the role of social movements in promoting democratization in the form of regime change; and a more recent literature on the ways social movements initiate democratic innovation in governing institutions and norm diffusion in already existing democracy. In this article, we argue that to fully understand social movement impact on democracy, we need to look beyond these two main approaches, as important as they are. Using the emblematic case of Spain’s 15-M pro-democracy movement to illustrate our conceptual proposal, we draw on existing literature to argue that social movements can impact democracy in several key arenas currently not sufficiently considered in the literature. We provide examples of democratic impact emerging from the experimentation around the central problematic of ‘real democracy’ in the ‘occupied squares’ to highlight several ways social movements’ democratic impact might be explored. We develop the concepts of hybridity and democratic laboratory to analyze these impacts and discuss their relation to contemporary theorizing about democracy and movement outcomes. We argue that adopting this broader approach to the democratic impact of social movements leads to a more nuanced understanding of movement outcomes and ‘success’.","PeriodicalId":47507,"journal":{"name":"Social Movement Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Movement Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2023.2190090","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social movement impact on democracy has primarily been treated in two ways in the literature: the role of social movements in promoting democratization in the form of regime change; and a more recent literature on the ways social movements initiate democratic innovation in governing institutions and norm diffusion in already existing democracy. In this article, we argue that to fully understand social movement impact on democracy, we need to look beyond these two main approaches, as important as they are. Using the emblematic case of Spain’s 15-M pro-democracy movement to illustrate our conceptual proposal, we draw on existing literature to argue that social movements can impact democracy in several key arenas currently not sufficiently considered in the literature. We provide examples of democratic impact emerging from the experimentation around the central problematic of ‘real democracy’ in the ‘occupied squares’ to highlight several ways social movements’ democratic impact might be explored. We develop the concepts of hybridity and democratic laboratory to analyze these impacts and discuss their relation to contemporary theorizing about democracy and movement outcomes. We argue that adopting this broader approach to the democratic impact of social movements leads to a more nuanced understanding of movement outcomes and ‘success’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新考虑社会运动对民主的影响:以西班牙的15-M运动为例
社会运动对民主的影响在文献中主要以两种方式处理:社会运动以政权更迭的形式促进民主化的作用;最近的一篇文献是关于社会运动如何在治理机构中发起民主创新以及在已经存在的民主中规范扩散。在本文中,我们认为,要充分理解社会运动对民主的影响,我们需要超越这两种主要方法,尽管它们很重要。利用西班牙15-M民主运动的标志性案例来说明我们的概念性建议,我们利用现有文献来论证社会运动可以在目前文献中没有充分考虑的几个关键领域影响民主。我们提供了围绕“被占领广场”的“真正民主”这一核心问题的实验中出现的民主影响的例子,以强调可能探索社会运动的民主影响的几种方式。我们发展了混合和民主实验室的概念来分析这些影响,并讨论它们与当代关于民主和运动结果的理论的关系。我们认为,采用这种更广泛的方法来研究社会运动的民主影响,可以更细致地理解运动结果和“成功”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Offside politics during the democratic erosion: social movements and May 2023 presidential election cycle in Turkey Negotiating politics on campus: dynamic (de-)politicization among student activists in post-2011 Egypt Saving ourselves: from climate shocks to climate action Saving ourselves: from climate shocks to climate action , by Dana R. Fisher, New York, Columbia University Press, 2024, ix + 210 pp., $19.95/£16.99 (hardcover), ISBN: 9780231209304, $18.95/£15.99 (e-book), ISBN: 9780231557870 Woman, life, freedom movement: dynamics of a movement in progress Performing civic spheres: aesthetic-political public appearance in the balfour protest in Israel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1