Pulmonary Function After COVID-19: Preliminary Results of Survivorship Registry at 1 Month, 3 Months, and 6 Months

M. Sunseri, N. Jemal, V. Kassapidis, R. Condos
{"title":"Pulmonary Function After COVID-19: Preliminary Results of Survivorship Registry at 1 Month, 3 Months, and 6 Months","authors":"M. Sunseri, N. Jemal, V. Kassapidis, R. Condos","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE: Survivors of the first SARS epidemic had impaired exercise capacity and lung function remain at six months after illness.1 Due to the novel nature of SARS-CoV-2, practitioners can only extrapolate from prior coronavirus pandemics when anticipating sequelae of COVID-19. This study seeks to help draw conclusions about long-term outcome in survivors of COVID-19. METHODS: Patients over 18 with confirmed COVID-19 are prospectively enrolled to a registry which collects clinical, serologic, functional, and radiographic data at one month, three months, six months, and twelve months post recovery from acute infection, as determined by symptoms (outpatients) or hospital discharge (inpatients). Complete pulmonary function tests (PFT) and 6 minute walk distances (6MWD) are collected at each time point. RESULTS: All currently completed PFT and 6MWD data were included in analysis (PFT: 1 month, n=16;3 months, n=26;6 months, n=25;6MWD: 1 month, n=14;3 months, n= 17;6 months, n=21). Mean 6MWD was 350m at 1 month, 362m at 3 months, and 373m at 6 months. At 1 month, 56% had normal spirometry;38% had restriction and 6% had mixed obstructive/restrictive pattern. At 3 months, 50% had normal spirometry with 42% showing restriction, 4% obstruction, and 4% mixed pattern. By 6 months, 64% had normal spirometry, 24% had restriction, and 12% had obstruction. There was diffusion limitation in 50% at both 1 month and 3 months;by 6 months, this improved to 32%. At one month, subjects older than 65 had significantly lower DLCO when compared those younger than 40 (10.54 vs 24.07 ml/min/mmHg, p<0.001) and when compared those aged 40-64 (10.54 vs 18.58 ml/min/mmHg, p<0.01);this change persisted at six months (13.67 vs 20.7 ml/min/mmHg, p<0.05). When stratified by clinical illness severity, or weight, there was no significant difference seen across PFT variables. 6MWD did not show significant difference when stratified by age, weight, or illness severity. CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of COVID-19, there are persistent functional and clinical sequelae up to six months post-recovery. Functional capacity remains impaired at six months. Predominant spirometric abnormality is restriction, which improves over time. Importantly, DLCO remains low in half of the subjects at both one and three months, with some improvement by 6 months. The diffusion impairment is significantly worse in patients older than 65. More investigation is required to elucidate the etiology of ongoing diffusion limitation and correlate with ventilation/perfusion studies.","PeriodicalId":23203,"journal":{"name":"TP92. TP092 CLINICAL ADVANCES IN SARS-COV-2 AND COVID-19","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP92. TP092 CLINICAL ADVANCES IN SARS-COV-2 AND COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RATIONALE: Survivors of the first SARS epidemic had impaired exercise capacity and lung function remain at six months after illness.1 Due to the novel nature of SARS-CoV-2, practitioners can only extrapolate from prior coronavirus pandemics when anticipating sequelae of COVID-19. This study seeks to help draw conclusions about long-term outcome in survivors of COVID-19. METHODS: Patients over 18 with confirmed COVID-19 are prospectively enrolled to a registry which collects clinical, serologic, functional, and radiographic data at one month, three months, six months, and twelve months post recovery from acute infection, as determined by symptoms (outpatients) or hospital discharge (inpatients). Complete pulmonary function tests (PFT) and 6 minute walk distances (6MWD) are collected at each time point. RESULTS: All currently completed PFT and 6MWD data were included in analysis (PFT: 1 month, n=16;3 months, n=26;6 months, n=25;6MWD: 1 month, n=14;3 months, n= 17;6 months, n=21). Mean 6MWD was 350m at 1 month, 362m at 3 months, and 373m at 6 months. At 1 month, 56% had normal spirometry;38% had restriction and 6% had mixed obstructive/restrictive pattern. At 3 months, 50% had normal spirometry with 42% showing restriction, 4% obstruction, and 4% mixed pattern. By 6 months, 64% had normal spirometry, 24% had restriction, and 12% had obstruction. There was diffusion limitation in 50% at both 1 month and 3 months;by 6 months, this improved to 32%. At one month, subjects older than 65 had significantly lower DLCO when compared those younger than 40 (10.54 vs 24.07 ml/min/mmHg, p<0.001) and when compared those aged 40-64 (10.54 vs 18.58 ml/min/mmHg, p<0.01);this change persisted at six months (13.67 vs 20.7 ml/min/mmHg, p<0.05). When stratified by clinical illness severity, or weight, there was no significant difference seen across PFT variables. 6MWD did not show significant difference when stratified by age, weight, or illness severity. CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of COVID-19, there are persistent functional and clinical sequelae up to six months post-recovery. Functional capacity remains impaired at six months. Predominant spirometric abnormality is restriction, which improves over time. Importantly, DLCO remains low in half of the subjects at both one and three months, with some improvement by 6 months. The diffusion impairment is significantly worse in patients older than 65. More investigation is required to elucidate the etiology of ongoing diffusion limitation and correlate with ventilation/perfusion studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19后肺功能:1个月、3个月和6个月生存登记的初步结果
理由:第一次SARS疫情的幸存者在病后六个月的运动能力和肺功能仍然受损由于SARS-CoV-2的新颖性,从业人员在预测COVID-19的后遗症时只能从之前的冠状病毒大流行中进行推断。这项研究旨在帮助得出关于COVID-19幸存者的长期结果的结论。方法:对18岁以上确诊COVID-19的患者进行前瞻性登记,收集急性感染恢复后1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月的临床、血清学、功能和放射学数据,根据症状(门诊患者)或出院(住院患者)确定。在每个时间点收集完整的肺功能测试(PFT)和6分钟步行距离(6MWD)。结果:所有目前完成的PFT和6MWD数据均纳入分析(PFT: 1个月,n=16;3个月,n=26;6个月,n=25;6MWD: 1个月,n=14;3个月,n= 17;6个月,n=21)。1个月时平均6MWD为3.5米,3个月时为3.62米,6个月时为3.73米。1个月时,56%肺活量正常,38%限制,6%混合阻塞性/限制性。3个月时,50%肺活量正常,42%肺活量受限,4%肺活量阻塞,4%肺活量混合。6个月时,64%肺活量正常,24%受限,12%梗阻。在1个月和3个月时,50%的患者有扩散限制;到6个月时,这一比例提高到32%。1个月时,65岁以上受试者DLCO明显低于40岁以下受试者(10.54 vs 24.07 ml/min/mmHg, p<0.001)和40-64岁受试者(10.54 vs 18.58 ml/min/mmHg, p<0.01),这种变化持续到6个月(13.67 vs 20.7 ml/min/mmHg, p<0.05)。当按临床疾病严重程度或体重分层时,PFT变量之间没有显着差异。当按年龄、体重或疾病严重程度分层时,mwd无显著差异。结论:在COVID-19幸存者中,在康复后6个月仍存在持续的功能和临床后遗症。6个月时,功能能力仍会受损。主要的肺活量异常是限制,随时间而改善。重要的是,在1个月和3个月时,半数受试者的DLCO仍然很低,6个月时有所改善。65岁以上的患者弥散损伤更为严重。需要更多的研究来阐明持续扩散限制的病因,并与通气/灌注研究相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes in Proning Critically Ill Obese Patients Infected with COVID-19 Pneumonia - The PROSECOVA Trial Influence of Hypoxemia on Lymphocytes Subpopulations in SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia The COVID19 Experience: Preliminary Results in 1651 Patients at Two Multi-Ethnic Community Hospitals in NYC Prone Positioning to Improve Oxygenation in COVID-19 Patients Outside Critical Care (PRONE-COVID Study) Admission Respiratory Rate-Oxygenation (ROX) Index and Outcome in COVID-19 Pneumonia with Acute Respiratory Failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1