Análisis de los sistemas de comunicación con la unidad de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: perspectiva del paciente y relación con variables clínicas

L. Rebolledo , A. Lué , I. Bruna-Barranco , M.T. Arroyo , J. Nerin , E. Alfambra , F. Gomollón
{"title":"Análisis de los sistemas de comunicación con la unidad de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: perspectiva del paciente y relación con variables clínicas","authors":"L. Rebolledo ,&nbsp;A. Lué ,&nbsp;I. Bruna-Barranco ,&nbsp;M.T. Arroyo ,&nbsp;J. Nerin ,&nbsp;E. Alfambra ,&nbsp;F. Gomollón","doi":"10.1016/j.eii.2016.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are chronic and recurrent diseases with great medical, social and economic impact and need a constant and multidisciplinary care. IBD Units emerged in order to coordinate the available resources and telemedicine appeared as an important tool for doctor-patient communication. Our purpose is to analyze how patients use the communication systems with our IBD Unit, as well as patients’ opinion about the current systems and the association with clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>we performed a cross-sectional study in which a survey was conducted to IBD patients who came to the IBD Unit between February and March of 2015. The survey consists of demographic and illness information, clinical activity, use and assessment of the communication systems, treatment adherence and quality of live.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 128 patients were included in the study. Among these, 126 (98.4%) knew and 94 (73.4%) used communication systems. In particular, 38 (40.4%) used the telephone (average score 4.45/5); 50 (53.2%) used the email (average score 4.75/5); and 6 (6.4%) used both. 24 patients (25.5%) contacted monthly, 19 (20.2%) half-yearly, and 51 (54.3%) annually. Comparing by frequency of communication, patients who contact monthly are significantly younger (38.13 vs. 40.16 vs. 48.49 years; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.005), have worse quality of live (41.58 vs. 53.79 vs. 51.57; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.002) and use more the email (87.5%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most patients use the communication systems, and have a high opinion about them. Younger patients with worse quality of life contact more frequently with the IBD Unit, mainly by email.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100473,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal al Día","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.eii.2016.04.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal al Día","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1696780116300306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are chronic and recurrent diseases with great medical, social and economic impact and need a constant and multidisciplinary care. IBD Units emerged in order to coordinate the available resources and telemedicine appeared as an important tool for doctor-patient communication. Our purpose is to analyze how patients use the communication systems with our IBD Unit, as well as patients’ opinion about the current systems and the association with clinical outcomes.

Methods

we performed a cross-sectional study in which a survey was conducted to IBD patients who came to the IBD Unit between February and March of 2015. The survey consists of demographic and illness information, clinical activity, use and assessment of the communication systems, treatment adherence and quality of live.

Results

A total of 128 patients were included in the study. Among these, 126 (98.4%) knew and 94 (73.4%) used communication systems. In particular, 38 (40.4%) used the telephone (average score 4.45/5); 50 (53.2%) used the email (average score 4.75/5); and 6 (6.4%) used both. 24 patients (25.5%) contacted monthly, 19 (20.2%) half-yearly, and 51 (54.3%) annually. Comparing by frequency of communication, patients who contact monthly are significantly younger (38.13 vs. 40.16 vs. 48.49 years; P = .005), have worse quality of live (41.58 vs. 53.79 vs. 51.57; P = .002) and use more the email (87.5%; P = .001).

Conclusions

Most patients use the communication systems, and have a high opinion about them. Younger patients with worse quality of life contact more frequently with the IBD Unit, mainly by email.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炎症性肠病科沟通系统分析:患者视角及与临床变量的关系
炎症性肠病(IBD)是一种慢性和复发性疾病,具有巨大的医疗、社会和经济影响,需要持续的多学科治疗。IBD单位的出现是为了协调可用的资源,远程医疗作为医患沟通的重要工具出现。我们的目的是分析患者如何使用我们IBD部门的通信系统,以及患者对当前系统的看法以及与临床结果的关联。方法:我们进行了一项横断面研究,对2015年2月至3月期间来到IBD病房的IBD患者进行了调查。调查内容包括人口统计和疾病信息、临床活动、通信系统的使用和评估、治疗依从性和生活质量。结果共纳入128例患者。其中126人(98.4%)知道,94人(73.4%)使用通信系统。特别是,38人(40.4%)使用了电话(平均得分4.45/5);50人(53.2%)使用电子邮件(平均得分4.75/5);6人(6.4%)两者都用。每月随访24例(25.5%),半年随访19例(20.2%),每年随访51例(54.3%)。按交流频率比较,每月接触的患者明显年轻化(38.13岁比40.16岁比48.49岁;P = 0.005),生存质量较差(41.58 vs. 53.79 vs. 51.57;P = .002),更多地使用电子邮件(87.5%;p = .001)。结论大多数患者使用该通信系统,并对其评价较高。生活质量较差的年轻患者与IBD部门的联系更频繁,主要是通过电子邮件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trombosis venosa cerebral en la enfermedad de Crohn refractaria a tratamiento: aportación de un caso y revisión de una serie de casos pediátricos Investigación clínica en 2016: artículos destacados Papel de las pruebas funcionales anorrectales en la enfermedad perianal: implicaciones para la práctica clínica Afectación de la vía aérea alta en enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Descripción de 2 casos Nuevas dianas terapéuticas en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1