The Default Space Theory of Consciousness: Phenomenological Support from Personal Observations and Clinical Deficits

R. Jerath, Connor Beveridge, M. Jensen
{"title":"The Default Space Theory of Consciousness: Phenomenological Support from Personal Observations and Clinical Deficits","authors":"R. Jerath, Connor Beveridge, M. Jensen","doi":"10.4236/wjns.2019.91001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consciousness is the unified, structured, subjective experience that we all share. The Default Space Theory has been proposed as a unified theory of consciousness that includes the brain and body in describing the infrastructure of consciousness. We have presented the theory in journals with a variety of academic specialties; however, the model is continually being developed. Due to the current state of science on the nature of conscious experience lacking hard data, the theory’s concepts must thoroughly explain and shoulder phenomenological observations including the phenomenology of deficits of consciousness. According to the theory, the thalamus serves as a central hub which networks the globally distributed, and continuous fast oscillations not only among the brain, but also the eyes, ears, skin, and other sensory organs. These oscillations form the virtual template of external space within the mind in which external sensory information is integrated into this pre-existing, dynamic space. In this article, we explore phenomenological support for our theory of conscious experience in which such experience resides entirely in such a virtual space, termed the default space. In order to provide such support, we discuss simple personal experiments and observations which anyone can partake along with phenomenal symptoms of clinical deficits. We encourage readers to perform the personal experiments we describe in order to gain an understanding of the various concepts of the theory. The neurological deficits we elucidate not only support the theory but clarify obscurities surrounding these conditions. We assert the support we give in our theory here will advance the uphill struggle many paramount theories face in gaining initial acceptance. Further research is needed in order to acquire empirical evidence for the veracity of our theory.","PeriodicalId":23878,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjns.2019.91001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Consciousness is the unified, structured, subjective experience that we all share. The Default Space Theory has been proposed as a unified theory of consciousness that includes the brain and body in describing the infrastructure of consciousness. We have presented the theory in journals with a variety of academic specialties; however, the model is continually being developed. Due to the current state of science on the nature of conscious experience lacking hard data, the theory’s concepts must thoroughly explain and shoulder phenomenological observations including the phenomenology of deficits of consciousness. According to the theory, the thalamus serves as a central hub which networks the globally distributed, and continuous fast oscillations not only among the brain, but also the eyes, ears, skin, and other sensory organs. These oscillations form the virtual template of external space within the mind in which external sensory information is integrated into this pre-existing, dynamic space. In this article, we explore phenomenological support for our theory of conscious experience in which such experience resides entirely in such a virtual space, termed the default space. In order to provide such support, we discuss simple personal experiments and observations which anyone can partake along with phenomenal symptoms of clinical deficits. We encourage readers to perform the personal experiments we describe in order to gain an understanding of the various concepts of the theory. The neurological deficits we elucidate not only support the theory but clarify obscurities surrounding these conditions. We assert the support we give in our theory here will advance the uphill struggle many paramount theories face in gaining initial acceptance. Further research is needed in order to acquire empirical evidence for the veracity of our theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意识的默认空间理论:来自个人观察和临床缺陷的现象学支持
意识是我们共同拥有的统一的、结构化的、主观的体验。默认空间理论被认为是一种统一的意识理论,在描述意识的基础结构时包括了大脑和身体。我们已经在各种学术专业期刊上发表了这一理论;然而,这种模式仍在不断发展。由于意识经验本质的科学现状缺乏确凿的数据,该理论的概念必须彻底解释和承担现象学的观察,包括意识缺陷的现象学。根据这一理论,丘脑作为一个中心枢纽,不仅在大脑之间,而且在眼睛、耳朵、皮肤和其他感觉器官之间,连接着全球分布的、连续的快速振荡。这些振荡在头脑中形成外部空间的虚拟模板,外部感官信息被整合到这个预先存在的动态空间中。在本文中,我们探索现象学支持我们的意识经验理论,其中这种经验完全存在于这样一个虚拟空间中,称为默认空间。为了提供这样的支持,我们讨论简单的个人实验和观察,任何人都可以参与临床缺陷的现象症状。我们鼓励读者进行我们描述的个人实验,以获得对理论的各种概念的理解。我们阐明的神经缺陷不仅支持了这一理论,而且澄清了围绕这些条件的模糊之处。我们断言,我们在这里对我们的理论所给予的支持,将推动许多最重要的理论在获得初步接受方面所面临的艰苦斗争。为了获得我们理论的真实性的经验证据,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alzheimer’s Disease Aβ-Amyloid Plaque Morphology Varies According to APOE Isotype Evolving Profile and Determinants of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment in the 3rd Month among Kinshasa’s Survivors (Democratic Republic of the Congo) Angiographic Features of Intracranial Aneurisms in Mali: A Preliminary Study of 105 Patients Proper Understanding of the Nerve Impulses and the Action Potential Photobiomodulation with Super-Pulsed Laser Shows Efficacy for Stroke and Aphasia: Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1