About Argument and Discussion.

J. Solomon
{"title":"About Argument and Discussion.","authors":"J. Solomon","doi":"10.4324/9781315169996-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strictly logical argument can be confrontational and destructive, but for the discussions needed in science classrooms each student contributes rational inputs in a collaborative manner, always trying to see what the other person means. Differences of opinion, especially when social and ethical issues are involved, can be weighed up and often resolved, if each student carefully explains the reasons for their opinion. Such discussions are very valuable to learning, and may be useful when experts give different opinions about a contentious topical matter. Examples are given from students' discussions about social issues.","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"113 1","pages":"57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169996-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Strictly logical argument can be confrontational and destructive, but for the discussions needed in science classrooms each student contributes rational inputs in a collaborative manner, always trying to see what the other person means. Differences of opinion, especially when social and ethical issues are involved, can be weighed up and often resolved, if each student carefully explains the reasons for their opinion. Such discussions are very valuable to learning, and may be useful when experts give different opinions about a contentious topical matter. Examples are given from students' discussions about social issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于争论和讨论。
严格的逻辑论证可能是对抗性的和破坏性的,但对于科学课堂上需要的讨论,每个学生都以合作的方式提供理性的输入,总是试图理解对方的意思。意见的分歧,特别是涉及到社会和道德问题时,如果每个学生都仔细解释他们意见的原因,就可以权衡并经常解决。这样的讨论对学习是非常有价值的,当专家们对一个有争议的话题给出不同的意见时,这种讨论可能会很有用。从学生对社会问题的讨论中给出例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Things you should not believe in science What Is a Chemical Element The Origin and Evolution of the Solar System. The mysterious cosmic rays The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1