Ist die Ergänzung der Basistherapie mit tiefdosiertem Prednisolon bei älteren Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis vertretbar? Resultate der randomisiert-kontrollierten GLORIA-Studie

Carina Mihai
{"title":"Ist die Ergänzung der Basistherapie mit tiefdosiertem Prednisolon bei älteren Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis vertretbar? Resultate der randomisiert-kontrollierten GLORIA-Studie","authors":"Carina Mihai","doi":"10.1159/000525970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low-dose glucocorticoid (GC) therapy is widely used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but the balance of benefit and harm is still unclear. Subjects and methods: The GLORIA (Glucocorticoid LOw-dose in RheumatoId Arthritis) pragmatic double-blind randomised trial compared 2 years of prednisolone, 5 mg/day, to placebo in patients aged 65+ with active RA. We allowed all cotreatments except long-term open label GC and minimised exclusion criteria, tailored to seniors. Benefit outcomes included disease activity (disease activity score; DAS28, coprimary) and joint damage (Sharp/van der Heijde, secondary). The other coprimary outcome was harm, expressed as the proportion of patients with ≥1 adverse event (AE) of special interest. Such events comprised serious events, GC-specific events and those causing study discontinuation. Longitudinal models analysed the data, with one-sided testing and 95% confidence limits (95% CL). Results: We randomised 451 patients with established RA and mean 2.1 comorbidities, age 72, disease duration 11 years and DAS28 4.5. 79% were on disease-modifying treatment, including 14% on biologics. 63% prednisolone versus 61% placebo patients completed the trial. Discontinuations were for AE (both, 14%), active disease (3 vs 4%) and for other (including covid pandemic-related disease) reasons (19 vs 21%); mean time in study was 19 months. Disease activity was 0.37 points lower on prednisolone (95% CL 0.23, p < 0.0001); joint damage progression was 1.7 points lower (95% CL 0.7, p = 0.003). 60% versus 49% of patients experienced the harm outcome, adjusted relative risk 1.24 (95% CL 1.04, p = 0.02), with the largest contrast in (mostly non-severe) infections. Other GC-specific events were rare. Conclusion: Add-on low-dose prednisolone has beneficial long-term effects in senior patients with established RA, with a trade-off of 24% increase in patients with mostly non-severe AE; this suggests a favourable balance of benefit and harm. Trial registration number: NCT02585258.","PeriodicalId":17887,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Autoimmun","volume":"17 1","pages":"111 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kompass Autoimmun","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low-dose glucocorticoid (GC) therapy is widely used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but the balance of benefit and harm is still unclear. Subjects and methods: The GLORIA (Glucocorticoid LOw-dose in RheumatoId Arthritis) pragmatic double-blind randomised trial compared 2 years of prednisolone, 5 mg/day, to placebo in patients aged 65+ with active RA. We allowed all cotreatments except long-term open label GC and minimised exclusion criteria, tailored to seniors. Benefit outcomes included disease activity (disease activity score; DAS28, coprimary) and joint damage (Sharp/van der Heijde, secondary). The other coprimary outcome was harm, expressed as the proportion of patients with ≥1 adverse event (AE) of special interest. Such events comprised serious events, GC-specific events and those causing study discontinuation. Longitudinal models analysed the data, with one-sided testing and 95% confidence limits (95% CL). Results: We randomised 451 patients with established RA and mean 2.1 comorbidities, age 72, disease duration 11 years and DAS28 4.5. 79% were on disease-modifying treatment, including 14% on biologics. 63% prednisolone versus 61% placebo patients completed the trial. Discontinuations were for AE (both, 14%), active disease (3 vs 4%) and for other (including covid pandemic-related disease) reasons (19 vs 21%); mean time in study was 19 months. Disease activity was 0.37 points lower on prednisolone (95% CL 0.23, p < 0.0001); joint damage progression was 1.7 points lower (95% CL 0.7, p = 0.003). 60% versus 49% of patients experienced the harm outcome, adjusted relative risk 1.24 (95% CL 1.04, p = 0.02), with the largest contrast in (mostly non-severe) infections. Other GC-specific events were rare. Conclusion: Add-on low-dose prednisolone has beneficial long-term effects in senior patients with established RA, with a trade-off of 24% increase in patients with mostly non-severe AE; this suggests a favourable balance of benefit and harm. Trial registration number: NCT02585258.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
把深沉的腺素作为基础药物配合治疗老年类风湿性关节炎是可行的吗?gloria随机试验的结果
背景:低剂量糖皮质激素(GC)治疗被广泛应用于类风湿关节炎(RA),但其利弊平衡尚不清楚。受试者和方法:GLORIA(低剂量糖皮质激素治疗类风湿性关节炎)实用双盲随机试验比较了65岁以上活动性RA患者2年5mg /天泼尼松龙和安慰剂。我们允许所有的联合治疗,除了长期开放标签GC和最小化排除标准,为老年人量身定制。获益结果包括疾病活动性(疾病活动性评分;DAS28(原发性)和关节损伤(Sharp/van der Heijde,继发性)。另一个主要结局是危害,用≥1个特殊不良事件(AE)的患者比例表示。这些事件包括严重事件、gc特异性事件和导致研究中止的事件。纵向模型分析数据,采用单侧检验和95%置信限(95% CL)。结果:我们随机抽取了451例已确诊的RA患者,平均2.1例合并症,年龄72岁,病程11年,DAS28 4.5。79%接受疾病改善治疗,其中14%接受生物制剂治疗。63%的强的松龙患者和61%的安慰剂患者完成了试验。停药的原因包括AE(均为14%)、活动性疾病(3比4%)和其他原因(包括covid - 19相关疾病)(19比21%);平均研究时间为19个月。泼尼松龙组疾病活动性降低0.37点(95% CL 0.23, p < 0.0001);关节损伤进展降低1.7分(95% CL 0.7, p = 0.003)。60%和49%的患者经历了伤害结果,调整后的相对风险为1.24 (95% CL为1.04,p = 0.02),最大的对比是(大多数是非严重的)感染。其他gc特有的事件很少见。结论:加用低剂量强的松龙对已确诊的老年RA患者具有有益的长期疗效,但对大多数非严重AE患者而言,加用低剂量强的松龙可使其获益24%;这表明了有利与不利的平衡。试验注册号:NCT02585258。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Morbus Crohn: Vielversprechende Behandlungsoption eines neuen IL-23-Inhibitors auf dem Weg zur Zulassung Moderne Immunologie hat unsere Behandlungsoptionen stark verändert Behandlung der eosinophilen Granulomatose mit Polyangiitis: Ist Benralizumab eine Alternative? Treat hard and early in SSc-ILD: milde ILD ist immer noch ILD Biologische Therapie bei systemischem Lupus erythematodes, Antiphospholipid-Syndrom und Sjögren-Syndrom: evidenz- und praxisbasierte Leitlinien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1