Recomendaciones de seguridad del paciente para sedaciones en procedimientos fuera del área quirúrgica

D. Arnal Velasco , E. Romero García , G. Martínez Palli , L. Muñoz Corsini , M. Rey Martínez , S. Postigo Morales
{"title":"Recomendaciones de seguridad del paciente para sedaciones en procedimientos fuera del área quirúrgica","authors":"D. Arnal Velasco ,&nbsp;E. Romero García ,&nbsp;G. Martínez Palli ,&nbsp;L. Muñoz Corsini ,&nbsp;M. Rey Martínez ,&nbsp;S. Postigo Morales","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2016.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There is an increasing and more complex demand for sedation for procedures out of the operating room. For different reasons, nowadays the administration of sedation varies considerably. We believe that a patient safety approach rather an approach out of corporate or economic interests is desirable.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We created a working group of experts within the Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR) to prepare a series of recommendations through a non-systematic review. These recommendations were validated by an expert panel of 31 anaesthesiologists through two rounds of an adaptation of the Delphi Method where more than 70% agreement was required.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The resulting recommendations include previous evaluation, material and staffing needs for sedation for procedures, post-sedation recommendations and activity and quality control advice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We present patient centred recommendations for the safe use of sedation for out of the operating room procedures from the point of view of the professionals with the most experience in its administration. We believe that these can be used as a guide to reduce variability and increase patient safety in the organisation of healthcare.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"32 3","pages":"Pages 155-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2016.07.003","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X16301233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction

There is an increasing and more complex demand for sedation for procedures out of the operating room. For different reasons, nowadays the administration of sedation varies considerably. We believe that a patient safety approach rather an approach out of corporate or economic interests is desirable.

Method

We created a working group of experts within the Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR) to prepare a series of recommendations through a non-systematic review. These recommendations were validated by an expert panel of 31 anaesthesiologists through two rounds of an adaptation of the Delphi Method where more than 70% agreement was required.

Results

The resulting recommendations include previous evaluation, material and staffing needs for sedation for procedures, post-sedation recommendations and activity and quality control advice.

Conclusion

We present patient centred recommendations for the safe use of sedation for out of the operating room procedures from the point of view of the professionals with the most experience in its administration. We believe that these can be used as a guide to reduce variability and increase patient safety in the organisation of healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在手术区域以外的手术中镇静的患者安全建议
在手术室外的手术中,镇静的需求越来越多,也越来越复杂。由于不同的原因,现在镇静的施用有很大的不同。我们认为,更可取的方法是患者安全,而不是出于企业或经济利益。方法:我们在西班牙麻醉和苏醒事件报告系统(SENSAR)内成立了一个专家工作组,通过非系统审查准备一系列建议。这些建议由31名麻醉师组成的专家小组通过两轮德尔菲法的改编来验证,其中要求70%以上的同意。结果得出的建议包括先前的评估、镇静过程的材料和人员需求、镇静后的建议以及活动和质量控制建议。结论我们从最具镇静管理经验的专业人员的角度,提出了以患者为中心的镇静在手术室外安全使用的建议。我们相信,这些可以作为一个指南,以减少可变性和提高医疗保健组织的患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Del papel a las nuevas tecnologías en la comunicación con nuestros pacientes Impacto de un programa de gestión de riesgo en la tasa de úlceras por presión La enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC): ¿esa gran conocida? Reflexiones sobre cómo mejorar la calidad diagnóstica El capital social como determinante de salud pública Efectividad de la evaluación de historias clínicas informatizadas en un hospital universitario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1