Mapping Digital Wellness Content

Sedona Chinn, Ariel Hasell, Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice
{"title":"Mapping Digital Wellness Content","authors":"Sedona Chinn, Ariel Hasell, Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2023.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the increasing popularity of wellness on social media, there islittle empirical study of its content or audiences. This study providesdescriptive information of prevalent themes in wellness content and thecomposition and views of its audiences. Using structural topic modeling toidentify central themes #wellness content on Instagram (N = 544,377posts), we find that while much content appears to promote desired healthbehaviors (e.g., quality sleep), other topics concern unsubstantiated claimsthat are often driven by commercial incentives. Nationally representativesurvey data of U.S. adults (N = 970) further reveals that women, moreliberal, and younger people are more likely to seek and see wellnesscontent. Those who actively seek wellness content are both more trustingof science institutions and have less accurate health beliefs compared withthose who are inadvertently exposed to wellness content. Though wellnesshas not received a great deal of scholarly attention, this description shedslight on the relevance of wellness to central questions in communicationdisciplines concerning expertise, (mis)information, and institutional trust. The popularity of wellness content in social media merits further empiricalexamination as such content may have important benefits and harms thatdisproportionately affect women and young people.","PeriodicalId":93587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2023.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite the increasing popularity of wellness on social media, there islittle empirical study of its content or audiences. This study providesdescriptive information of prevalent themes in wellness content and thecomposition and views of its audiences. Using structural topic modeling toidentify central themes #wellness content on Instagram (N = 544,377posts), we find that while much content appears to promote desired healthbehaviors (e.g., quality sleep), other topics concern unsubstantiated claimsthat are often driven by commercial incentives. Nationally representativesurvey data of U.S. adults (N = 970) further reveals that women, moreliberal, and younger people are more likely to seek and see wellnesscontent. Those who actively seek wellness content are both more trustingof science institutions and have less accurate health beliefs compared withthose who are inadvertently exposed to wellness content. Though wellnesshas not received a great deal of scholarly attention, this description shedslight on the relevance of wellness to central questions in communicationdisciplines concerning expertise, (mis)information, and institutional trust. The popularity of wellness content in social media merits further empiricalexamination as such content may have important benefits and harms thatdisproportionately affect women and young people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制数字健康内容
尽管社交媒体上的健康话题越来越受欢迎,但对其内容或受众的实证研究却很少。本研究提供了健康内容中流行主题的描述性信息,以及其受众的组成和观点。使用结构主题模型来确定Instagram上的核心主题#健康内容(N = 544,377个帖子),我们发现,虽然许多内容似乎促进了理想的健康行为(例如,高质量的睡眠),但其他主题涉及未经证实的主张,这些主张通常是由商业动机驱动的。一项针对美国成年人的全国代表性调查数据(N = 970)进一步显示,更自由的女性和年轻人更有可能寻求和看到健康内容。与那些无意中接触到健康内容的人相比,那些积极寻求健康内容的人更信任科学机构,但对健康的信念却不那么准确。尽管健康并没有得到大量的学术关注,但这种描述对健康与沟通学科中有关专业知识、(错误)信息和机构信任的核心问题的相关性有轻微的影响。社交媒体上健康内容的流行值得进一步的实证检验,因为这些内容可能有重要的好处和坏处,对女性和年轻人的影响尤其大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
#Asylum: How Syrian Refugees Engage with Online Information Who Does(n't) Target You? A Dataset for The Study of Online Radicalization Through Incel Forum Archives Detecting Misinformation: Identifying False News Spread by Political Leaders in the Global South @Who? Investigating Possible Errors in Studies Linking Survey and Twitter Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1