The significance of love in relation to looked-after children and child sexual exploitation

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Critical and Radical Social Work Pub Date : 2022-06-17 DOI:10.1332/204986021x16523430934288
R. C. Plowright
{"title":"The significance of love in relation to looked-after children and child sexual exploitation","authors":"R. C. Plowright","doi":"10.1332/204986021x16523430934288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on the knowledge that looked-after children are disproportionately involved in child sexual exploitation, this critical systematic literature review considers the significance of ‘love’, using bell hooks’ ‘love ethic’. This literature review applies a systematic approach to retrieving literature and includes ten peer-reviewed journal articles containing primary research from individuals with lived experience of being a looked-after child and child sexual exploitation, or professionals within the field. Thematic analysis is used to identify the themes of risk, agency and relational practice. Together, these explore how dominant discourses of neoliberalism, patriarchy and capitalism shape modern social work, increase the risk of child sexual exploitation for looked-after children and maintain conditions needed for child sexual exploitation to function. bell hooks’ conceptualisation of the ‘love ethic’ is discussed as a possible framework in meeting the unmet emotional and economic needs of looked-after children through using ‘love as action’. ‘Love’, critical thinking and critical reflection are then recommended for social work.","PeriodicalId":44175,"journal":{"name":"Critical and Radical Social Work","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical and Radical Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204986021x16523430934288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on the knowledge that looked-after children are disproportionately involved in child sexual exploitation, this critical systematic literature review considers the significance of ‘love’, using bell hooks’ ‘love ethic’. This literature review applies a systematic approach to retrieving literature and includes ten peer-reviewed journal articles containing primary research from individuals with lived experience of being a looked-after child and child sexual exploitation, or professionals within the field. Thematic analysis is used to identify the themes of risk, agency and relational practice. Together, these explore how dominant discourses of neoliberalism, patriarchy and capitalism shape modern social work, increase the risk of child sexual exploitation for looked-after children and maintain conditions needed for child sexual exploitation to function. bell hooks’ conceptualisation of the ‘love ethic’ is discussed as a possible framework in meeting the unmet emotional and economic needs of looked-after children through using ‘love as action’. ‘Love’, critical thinking and critical reflection are then recommended for social work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱的重要性与被照顾的儿童和儿童性剥削有关
根据被照顾的儿童不成比例地参与儿童性剥削的知识,这篇批判性的系统文献综述考虑了“爱”的意义,使用了贝尔·胡克的“爱伦理”。本文献综述采用系统的方法检索文献,包括十篇同行评议的期刊文章,其中包含来自有被照顾儿童和儿童性剥削生活经历的个人或该领域专业人士的主要研究。专题分析用于确定风险、机构和关系实践的主题。这些研究共同探讨了新自由主义、父权制和资本主义的主导话语如何塑造现代社会工作,增加被照看儿童遭受儿童性剥削的风险,以及维持儿童性剥削运作所需的条件。Bell hooks对“爱伦理”的概念化作为一种可能的框架进行了讨论,通过使用“爱即行动”来满足被照顾儿童未满足的情感和经济需求。“爱”、批判性思维和批判性反思被推荐用于社会工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Talking about needs and rights in inter-agency meetings: interpretive contests in Swedish welfare provision Maybe you can be too resilient: a sociological investigation into how student social workers perceive resilience in their practice Critique and Critical Social Work: a meta-theoretical perspective Who’s right? What rights? How? Rights debates in Irish social work: a call for nuance Lordship and bondage in the dialectics of social work: regulation and professional autonomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1