Damage identification in bridge structures: review of available methods and case studies

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Australian Journal of Structural Engineering Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1080/13287982.2022.2120239
S. Karimi, O. Mirza
{"title":"Damage identification in bridge structures: review of available methods and case studies","authors":"S. Karimi, O. Mirza","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2022.2120239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Bridges are integral parts of the infrastructure and play a major role in civil engineering. Bridge health monitoring is necessary to extend the life of a bridge and retain safety. Periodic monitoring contributes significantly in keeping these structures operational and extends structural integrity. Different researchers have proposed different methods for identifying bridge damages based on different theories and laboratory tests. Several review papers have been published in the literature on the identification of damage and crack in bridge structures in the last few decades. In this paper, a review of literature on damage identification in bridge structures based on different methods and theories is carried out. The aim of this paper is to critically evaluate different methods that have been proposed to detect damages in different bridges. Different papers have been carefully reviewed, and the gaps, limitations, and superiority of the methods used are identified. Furthermore, in most of the reviews, future applications and several sustainable methods which are necessary for bridge monitoring are covered. This study significantly contributes to the literature by critically examining different methods, giving guidelines on the methods that identify the damages in bridge structures more accurately, and serving as a good reference for other researchers and future works.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2022.2120239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bridges are integral parts of the infrastructure and play a major role in civil engineering. Bridge health monitoring is necessary to extend the life of a bridge and retain safety. Periodic monitoring contributes significantly in keeping these structures operational and extends structural integrity. Different researchers have proposed different methods for identifying bridge damages based on different theories and laboratory tests. Several review papers have been published in the literature on the identification of damage and crack in bridge structures in the last few decades. In this paper, a review of literature on damage identification in bridge structures based on different methods and theories is carried out. The aim of this paper is to critically evaluate different methods that have been proposed to detect damages in different bridges. Different papers have been carefully reviewed, and the gaps, limitations, and superiority of the methods used are identified. Furthermore, in most of the reviews, future applications and several sustainable methods which are necessary for bridge monitoring are covered. This study significantly contributes to the literature by critically examining different methods, giving guidelines on the methods that identify the damages in bridge structures more accurately, and serving as a good reference for other researchers and future works.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桥梁结构损伤识别:现有方法和案例研究综述
桥梁是基础设施的组成部分,在土木工程中起着重要作用。桥梁健康监测是延长桥梁使用寿命、保障桥梁安全的必要手段。定期监测有助于保持这些结构的运行和扩展结构的完整性。不同的研究人员基于不同的理论和实验室试验,提出了不同的桥梁损伤识别方法。在过去的几十年里,关于桥梁结构损伤和裂缝识别的文献已经发表了几篇综述论文。本文对基于不同方法和理论的桥梁结构损伤识别文献进行了综述。本文的目的是批判性地评估已经提出的不同方法来检测不同桥梁的损伤。不同的论文已经仔细审查,和差距,局限性和优越性所使用的方法被确定。此外,在大多数评论中,涵盖了桥梁监测所需的未来应用和几种可持续方法。本研究通过批判性地考察不同的方法,对文献做出了重大贡献,为更准确地识别桥梁结构损伤的方法提供了指导,并为其他研究人员和未来的工作提供了很好的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.
期刊最新文献
Performance evaluation of concrete comprising sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate Improving seismic performance of structural systems via reinforcing column bases Evaluation on structural performance of hybrid composite post-tension plate girder through finite element analysis Determination of response modification coefficient of SPSW in RC frame using plastic design method A plastic hinge method for static pushover analysis of 3D frame structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1