A test of wildlife warning reflectors as a way to reduce risk of wildlife-train collisions

IF 1.2 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Nature Conservation Research Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.3897/natureconservation.47.73052
K. Jasińska, J. Babińska-Werka, D. Krauze‐Gryz
{"title":"A test of wildlife warning reflectors as a way to reduce risk of wildlife-train collisions","authors":"K. Jasińska, J. Babińska-Werka, D. Krauze‐Gryz","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.47.73052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Looking for an effective method to reduce risk of animal-train collisions, we tested the system of wildlife warning reflectors, a method usually used on roads. The research was conducted in central Poland, along a 2.1 km stretch of the E65 railway line near Warsaw, during eight months, in the years 2010–2011. For six months of a test period, the reflectors were uncovered (active) and, for the next two months of the control period, they were covered (non-active). Digital cameras were used to register animal reactions to trains 24-hours per day. We compared the probability of escape (escape = 1; no reaction = 0) from an oncoming train during test and control periods of the research, in different parts of a day (i.e. day vs. night) and compared escape time of roe deer between day and night and with reflectors covered and uncovered. Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and brown hare (Lepus europaeus) were observed most often (702 observations in total). The status of reflectors (covered/uncovered) did not influence the probability of animals’ escape from an oncoming train. The only factors that affected the probability of escape were animal species and time of a day. Of the three species, roe deer was most likely to escape from an oncoming train (89% of probability at day and 52% during night, pooled data for covered and uncovered reflectors). Timing of roe deer escape from an oncoming train did not differ between day (6.4 seconds) and night, with either reflectors covered (7.5 seconds) or uncovered (4.6 seconds). The results indicated that wildlife warning reflectors were not effective to modify animal behaviour and to reduce risk of animal-train collisions.","PeriodicalId":54166,"journal":{"name":"Nature Conservation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.47.73052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Looking for an effective method to reduce risk of animal-train collisions, we tested the system of wildlife warning reflectors, a method usually used on roads. The research was conducted in central Poland, along a 2.1 km stretch of the E65 railway line near Warsaw, during eight months, in the years 2010–2011. For six months of a test period, the reflectors were uncovered (active) and, for the next two months of the control period, they were covered (non-active). Digital cameras were used to register animal reactions to trains 24-hours per day. We compared the probability of escape (escape = 1; no reaction = 0) from an oncoming train during test and control periods of the research, in different parts of a day (i.e. day vs. night) and compared escape time of roe deer between day and night and with reflectors covered and uncovered. Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and brown hare (Lepus europaeus) were observed most often (702 observations in total). The status of reflectors (covered/uncovered) did not influence the probability of animals’ escape from an oncoming train. The only factors that affected the probability of escape were animal species and time of a day. Of the three species, roe deer was most likely to escape from an oncoming train (89% of probability at day and 52% during night, pooled data for covered and uncovered reflectors). Timing of roe deer escape from an oncoming train did not differ between day (6.4 seconds) and night, with either reflectors covered (7.5 seconds) or uncovered (4.6 seconds). The results indicated that wildlife warning reflectors were not effective to modify animal behaviour and to reduce risk of animal-train collisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A野生动物警告反射器的测试,以减少野生动物与火车相撞的风险
为了寻找一种有效的方法来降低动物与火车相撞的风险,我们测试了野生动物警告反射器系统,这是一种通常用于道路的方法。这项研究是在波兰中部华沙附近的E65铁路沿线进行的,历时8个月,从2010年到2011年。在六个月的测试期间,反射器被揭开(活动),在接下来的两个月的控制期间,它们被覆盖(非活动)。每天24小时用数码相机记录动物对火车的反应。我们比较了逃脱的概率(逃脱= 1;在研究的测试和控制期间,在一天的不同时段(即白天与夜晚),对迎面车的无反应= 0),并比较白天和夜间以及覆盖和未覆盖反射器时狍的逃跑时间。鹿(Capreolus Capreolus)、红狐(Vulpes Vulpes)和褐兔(Lepus europaeus)的观测次数最多(共702次)。反射器的状态(覆盖/未覆盖)不影响动物逃离迎面而来的火车的概率。影响逃脱概率的唯一因素是动物种类和一天中的时间。在这三个物种中,狍最有可能从迎面而来的火车中逃脱(白天的概率为89%,夜间为52%,收集了覆盖和未覆盖反射器的数据)。在白天(6.4秒)和夜间(7.5秒)盖上反光镜或未盖上反光镜(4.6秒)的情况下,狍从迎面而起的火车中逃生的时间没有差异(6.4秒)。结果表明,野生动物警告反射器不能有效地改变动物的行为,降低动物与火车碰撞的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Conservation Research
Nature Conservation Research BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the threat status of reptile species from Vietnam - Implementation of the One Plan Approach to Conservation Conserving the threatened woody vegetation on dune slopes: Monitoring the decline and designing adaptive strategies for restoration Has climate change hijacked the environmental agenda? Dynamic change of habitat quality and its key driving factors in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China Performance of SNP markers for parentage analysis in the Italian Alpine brown bear using non-invasive samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1