Erratum: Online information on chia seeds – A systematic content analysis

T. Biczók, Sz. Kassai, V. A. Gyarmathy
{"title":"Erratum: Online information on chia seeds – A systematic content analysis","authors":"T. Biczók, Sz. Kassai, V. A. Gyarmathy","doi":"10.1556/2066.2019.00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a recent increase in interest in chia seeds as a growing number of people try to observe a healthy lifestyle, particularly healthy eating habits. Given the increasing popularity of chia seeds in Hungary as well, we performed a study to examine what information on chia seeds is available on Hungarian websites.We conducted a systematic, qualitative content analysis to examine the first 200 Hungarian results of a Google search on “chia seeds”.We identified five main topics: 1. general information, 2. effects/side-effects, 3. modes of preparation, 4. target audience, and 5. tone of the article. Sometimes information (especially on the effects) was presented in a sensationalist manner, and some claims were not scientifically well-founded, but rather based on subjective opinion.In the online media, chia seed consumption was mainly recommended for those who are trying to lose weight and for diabetics, even though there is currently no proof that it can improve the condition of such people. Further studies are needed to demonstrate and confirm claims related to the beneficial effects of the chia seed. Until this has been done, readers of Google-search results – especially those who have a health condition – should be cautious about certain statements published on non-scientific websites.","PeriodicalId":52607,"journal":{"name":"Developments in Health Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2066.2019.00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been a recent increase in interest in chia seeds as a growing number of people try to observe a healthy lifestyle, particularly healthy eating habits. Given the increasing popularity of chia seeds in Hungary as well, we performed a study to examine what information on chia seeds is available on Hungarian websites.We conducted a systematic, qualitative content analysis to examine the first 200 Hungarian results of a Google search on “chia seeds”.We identified five main topics: 1. general information, 2. effects/side-effects, 3. modes of preparation, 4. target audience, and 5. tone of the article. Sometimes information (especially on the effects) was presented in a sensationalist manner, and some claims were not scientifically well-founded, but rather based on subjective opinion.In the online media, chia seed consumption was mainly recommended for those who are trying to lose weight and for diabetics, even though there is currently no proof that it can improve the condition of such people. Further studies are needed to demonstrate and confirm claims related to the beneficial effects of the chia seed. Until this has been done, readers of Google-search results – especially those who have a health condition – should be cautious about certain statements published on non-scientific websites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
勘误:在线奇亚籽信息-系统的内容分析
最近,随着越来越多的人试图遵循健康的生活方式,尤其是健康的饮食习惯,人们对奇亚籽的兴趣有所增加。鉴于奇亚籽在匈牙利越来越受欢迎,我们进行了一项研究,以检查匈牙利网站上有哪些关于奇亚籽的信息。我们进行了系统的定性内容分析,以检查谷歌搜索“奇亚籽”的前200个匈牙利结果。我们确定了五个主要主题:1。2.一般信息;影响/副作用,3。4.准备方式;目标受众;文章的语气。有时,信息(尤其是关于影响的信息)是以一种耸人听闻的方式呈现的,有些说法没有科学依据,而是基于主观意见。在网络媒体上,奇亚籽主要被推荐给那些试图减肥的人和糖尿病患者,尽管目前没有证据表明它可以改善这些人的病情。需要进一步的研究来证明和证实与奇亚籽有益作用有关的说法。在此之前,谷歌搜索结果的读者——尤其是那些有健康问题的人——应该对非科学网站上发表的某些声明保持谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of nurses and social caregivers in relation to falls among elderly patients in healthcare settings in a Hungarian county A comparison of the results of old-generation (MEL 60) and new-generation (SCHWIND AMARIS) refractive excimer laser treatments Should academics be concerned about articles written by ChatGPT? Investigation of the effectiveness of a complex injury prevention programme among young swimmers National eye health data from the Hungary's Comprehensive Health Protection Screening Program 2010–2020–2030 (MÁESZ)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1