Structural Organization of Perisomatic Inhibition in the Mouse Medial Prefrontal Cortex

Petra Nagy-Pál, Judit M. Veres, Zsuzsanna Fekete, M. R. Karlócai, Filippo Weisz, Bence Barabás, Zsófia Reéb, N. Hájos
{"title":"Structural Organization of Perisomatic Inhibition in the Mouse Medial Prefrontal Cortex","authors":"Petra Nagy-Pál, Judit M. Veres, Zsuzsanna Fekete, M. R. Karlócai, Filippo Weisz, Bence Barabás, Zsófia Reéb, N. Hájos","doi":"10.1101/2023.06.14.545032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perisomatic inhibition profoundly controls neural function. However, the structural organization of inhibitory circuits giving rise to the perisomatic inhibition in the higher-order cortices is not completely known. Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of those GABAergic cells in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) that provide inputs onto the somata and proximal dendrites of pyramidal neurons. Our results show that most GABAergic axonal varicosities contacting the perisomatic region of superficial (layer 2/3) and deep (layer 5) pyramidal cells express parvalbumin (PV) or cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1). Further, we found that the ratio of PV/CB1 GABAergic inputs is larger on the somatic membrane surface of pyramidal tract neurons in comparison with those projecting to the contralateral hemisphere. Our morphologic analysis of in vitro labeled PV+ basket cells (PVBC) and CCK/CB1+ basket cells (CCKBC) revealed differences in many features. PVBC dendrites and axons arborized preferentially within the layer where their soma was located. In contrast, the axons of CCKBCs expanded throughout layers, although their dendrites were found preferentially either in superficial or deep layers. Finally, using anterograde trans-synaptic tracing we observed that PVBCs are preferentially innervated by thalamic and basal amygdala afferents in layers 5a and 5b, respectively. Thus, our results suggest that PVBCs can control the local circuit operation in a layer-specific manner via their characteristic arborization, whereas CCKBCs rather provide cross-layer inhibition in the mPFC. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Inhibitory cells in cortical circuits are crucial for the precise control of local network activity. Nevertheless, in higher-order cortical areas that are involved in cognitive functions like decision-making, working memory, and cognitive flexibility, the structural organization of inhibitory cell circuits is not completely understood. In this study we show that perisomatic inhibitory control of excitatory cells in the medial prefrontal cortex is performed by two types of basket cells endowed with different morphologic properties that provide inhibitory inputs with distinct layer specificity on cells projecting to disparate areas. Revealing this difference in innervation strategy of the two basket cell types is a key step toward understanding how they fulfill their distinct roles in cortical network operations.","PeriodicalId":22786,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"41 1","pages":"6972 - 6987"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.14.545032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perisomatic inhibition profoundly controls neural function. However, the structural organization of inhibitory circuits giving rise to the perisomatic inhibition in the higher-order cortices is not completely known. Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of those GABAergic cells in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) that provide inputs onto the somata and proximal dendrites of pyramidal neurons. Our results show that most GABAergic axonal varicosities contacting the perisomatic region of superficial (layer 2/3) and deep (layer 5) pyramidal cells express parvalbumin (PV) or cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1). Further, we found that the ratio of PV/CB1 GABAergic inputs is larger on the somatic membrane surface of pyramidal tract neurons in comparison with those projecting to the contralateral hemisphere. Our morphologic analysis of in vitro labeled PV+ basket cells (PVBC) and CCK/CB1+ basket cells (CCKBC) revealed differences in many features. PVBC dendrites and axons arborized preferentially within the layer where their soma was located. In contrast, the axons of CCKBCs expanded throughout layers, although their dendrites were found preferentially either in superficial or deep layers. Finally, using anterograde trans-synaptic tracing we observed that PVBCs are preferentially innervated by thalamic and basal amygdala afferents in layers 5a and 5b, respectively. Thus, our results suggest that PVBCs can control the local circuit operation in a layer-specific manner via their characteristic arborization, whereas CCKBCs rather provide cross-layer inhibition in the mPFC. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Inhibitory cells in cortical circuits are crucial for the precise control of local network activity. Nevertheless, in higher-order cortical areas that are involved in cognitive functions like decision-making, working memory, and cognitive flexibility, the structural organization of inhibitory cell circuits is not completely understood. In this study we show that perisomatic inhibitory control of excitatory cells in the medial prefrontal cortex is performed by two types of basket cells endowed with different morphologic properties that provide inhibitory inputs with distinct layer specificity on cells projecting to disparate areas. Revealing this difference in innervation strategy of the two basket cell types is a key step toward understanding how they fulfill their distinct roles in cortical network operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小鼠内侧前额叶皮层核周抑制的结构组织
周围抑制深刻地控制神经功能。然而,引起高阶皮层周围抑制的抑制回路的结构组织尚不完全清楚。在这里,我们对内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC)中的gaba能细胞进行了全面的分析,这些细胞向锥体神经元的体细胞和近端树突提供输入。我们的研究结果表明,大多数接触浅锥体细胞(2/3层)和深锥体细胞(5层)的表皮周围区域的gaba能轴突变异表达小白蛋白(PV)或大麻素受体1 (CB1)。此外,我们还发现,与投射到对侧半球的神经元相比,PV/CB1 gaba能输入在锥体束神经元体膜表面的比例更大。我们对体外标记PV+篮细胞(PVBC)和CCK/CB1+篮细胞(CCKBC)的形态学分析揭示了许多特征的差异。PVBC树突和轴突优先在其胞体所在的层内发生。相比之下,CCKBCs的轴突遍布各层,尽管它们的树突优先出现在浅层或深层。最后,通过顺行突触示踪,我们观察到pvbc分别优先受丘脑和基底杏仁核传入神经支配。因此,我们的研究结果表明,pvbc可以通过其特有的树突化以特定层的方式控制局部电路的操作,而cckbc则可以在mPFC中提供跨层抑制。意义声明皮层回路中的抑制细胞对于精确控制局部网络活动至关重要。然而,在涉及决策、工作记忆和认知灵活性等认知功能的高阶皮层区域,抑制细胞回路的结构组织尚不完全清楚。在这项研究中,我们发现内侧前额叶皮层兴奋性细胞的周围抑制控制是由两种具有不同形态特性的篮状细胞执行的,这些篮状细胞对投射到不同区域的细胞提供具有不同层特异性的抑制输入。揭示这两种篮状细胞类型在神经支配策略上的差异是理解它们如何在皮层网络操作中发挥其独特作用的关键一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Schlüter et al., “Rabphilin Knock-Out Mice Reveal That Rabphilin Is Not Required for Rab3 Function in Regulating Neurotransmitter Release” Category-selective representation of relationships in visual cortex Phosphorylation of RPT6 controls its ability to bind DNA and regulate gene expression in the hippocampus of male rats during memory formation Neural network connectivity following opioid dependence is altered by a common genetic variant in the mu-opioid receptor,OPRM1A118G An Ascending Excitatory Circuit from the Dorsal Raphe for Sensory Modulation of Pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1