SARS-CoV-2 Maternal Infection and Newborn Outcomes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review [ID: 1377802]

T. Ibrahim, L. Clore, Tara Mathias-Prabhu, Lewis Rubin, Rachel Scott, Rebecca Yamamoto
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 Maternal Infection and Newborn Outcomes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review [ID: 1377802]","authors":"T. Ibrahim, L. Clore, Tara Mathias-Prabhu, Lewis Rubin, Rachel Scott, Rebecca Yamamoto","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000929712.81628.b2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected several maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, the effect of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on newborn birth weight has not been comprehensively evaluated. We performed a systematic review to determine the scope of literature considering the effect of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on birth weight normalized for gestational age. METHODS: We searched OVID Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from January 1, 2019, to June 17, 2022, using keywords “gestational age,” “birthweight,” “newborn,” and “COVID-19.” Studies that were nonhuman, unspecified date/location, published in non-English language, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, case series, narrative reviews, and editorials were excluded. We extracted data from included publications on perinatal and maternal outcomes, demographics, and study type. RESULTS: Of 899 studies identified, 204 met criteria and 24 included birth weight and gestational age data on COVID-19-positive (n=10,193) and -negative (n=611,018) maternal/newborn dyads. 11 retrospective cohort, 10 prospective cohort, and 3 case–control studies from Europe (33%), North America (25%), Asia (21%), and the Middle East (13%) were evaluated. In those comparing COVID-19-positive versus -negative mothers, most studies did not find significant differences in gestational age and birth weight. Among those studies comparing mild versus severe disease, the majority found significant differences in gestational age and birth weight. CONCLUSION: This internationally aggregated systematic review reveals potential differences in birth weight by disease severity that prompt an ongoing investigation of the effects of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on gestational age-dependent birth weight.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000929712.81628.b2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected several maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, the effect of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on newborn birth weight has not been comprehensively evaluated. We performed a systematic review to determine the scope of literature considering the effect of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on birth weight normalized for gestational age. METHODS: We searched OVID Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from January 1, 2019, to June 17, 2022, using keywords “gestational age,” “birthweight,” “newborn,” and “COVID-19.” Studies that were nonhuman, unspecified date/location, published in non-English language, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, case series, narrative reviews, and editorials were excluded. We extracted data from included publications on perinatal and maternal outcomes, demographics, and study type. RESULTS: Of 899 studies identified, 204 met criteria and 24 included birth weight and gestational age data on COVID-19-positive (n=10,193) and -negative (n=611,018) maternal/newborn dyads. 11 retrospective cohort, 10 prospective cohort, and 3 case–control studies from Europe (33%), North America (25%), Asia (21%), and the Middle East (13%) were evaluated. In those comparing COVID-19-positive versus -negative mothers, most studies did not find significant differences in gestational age and birth weight. Among those studies comparing mild versus severe disease, the majority found significant differences in gestational age and birth weight. CONCLUSION: This internationally aggregated systematic review reveals potential differences in birth weight by disease severity that prompt an ongoing investigation of the effects of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on gestational age-dependent birth weight.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2感染与新生儿结局的综合系统评价[j]
导言:COVID-19大流行影响了几种孕产妇和围产期结局。然而,母体感染SARS-CoV-2对新生儿出生体重的影响尚未得到全面评价。我们进行了一项系统综述,以确定考虑母体SARS-CoV-2感染对胎龄标准化出生体重影响的文献范围。方法:我们从2019年1月1日至2022年6月17日检索OVID Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane CENTRAL、Web of Science和Google Scholar数据库,使用关键词“胎龄”、“出生体重”、“新生儿”和“COVID-19”。排除非人类、未确定日期/地点、以非英语语言发表的研究、系统综述、荟萃分析、病例报告、病例系列、叙述性综述和社论。我们从包括围产期和产妇结局、人口统计学和研究类型的出版物中提取数据。结果:在确定的899项研究中,204项符合标准,24项包括covid -19阳性(n=10,193)和阴性(n= 611018)孕产妇/新生儿双体的出生体重和胎龄数据。11项回顾性队列研究、10项前瞻性队列研究和3项病例对照研究分别来自欧洲(33%)、北美(25%)、亚洲(21%)和中东(13%)。在比较covid -19阳性母亲和阴性母亲的研究中,大多数研究没有发现胎龄和出生体重的显着差异。在那些比较轻微和严重疾病的研究中,大多数发现胎龄和出生体重有显著差异。结论:这项国际汇总的系统综述揭示了疾病严重程度对出生体重的潜在差异,促使人们继续研究母体SARS-CoV-2感染对胎龄依赖性出生体重的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Agreement. A Prospective Study to Assess for Histologic Changes on Vulvar Biopsies in Postmenopausal Women With Lichen Sclerosus Treated With Fractionated CO2 Laser Therapy [ID: 1339895] Prescribing Patterns for Postpartum Contraception Among Breastfeeding Patients Insured Under Medicaid [ID: 1375071] Evaluation of Perioperative Factors Contributing to Organ Space Surgical Site Infection After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy [ID: 1374862] Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1