Effectiveness and feasibility of transradial approaches for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Lijun Gan , Qingxian Lib , Rong Liuc , Yuxin Zhaoc , Jianjun Qiuc , Yuhua Liao
{"title":"Effectiveness and feasibility of transradial approaches for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction","authors":"Lijun Gan ,&nbsp;Qingxian Lib ,&nbsp;Rong Liuc ,&nbsp;Yuxin Zhaoc ,&nbsp;Jianjun Qiuc ,&nbsp;Yuhua Liao","doi":"10.1016/S1007-4376(09)60068-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of the transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>195 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly divided into two groups according to the different PCI operation pathways. 105 cases were assigned to the transfemoral artery group and 90 cases to the transradial artery group. We analyzed the data from the two groups, including the achievement ratio of paracentesis, cannulation time, the time from local anesthesia to the first time balloon inflation, the time of the total procedure, achievement ratio of PCI, incidence rate of vascular complications, total duration of hospitalization, and the six-month follow-up results in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our results showed that the achievement ratio of arteriopuncture, cannulation time and the time from local anesthesia to the first time balloon inflation in the transradial and transfemoral groups were 98.9% vs. 100%, 3.15 ± 1.56 min vs. 2.86 ± 0.97 min, and 18.56 ± 4.37 min vs. 17.75 ± 3.21 min, respectively. These differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. The total operating time was 29.75 ± 4.38 min for the transradial group and 27.89 ± 3.95 min(P &lt; 0.05) for the transfemoral group. The operation achievement ratio in the transradial group was 96.7%, and 96.2% in the transfemoral group. The incidence of puncture point complications was 2.2% in the transradial group and 11.4% in the transfemoral group, and this difference was significant. The duration of hospitalization was 10.56 ± 2.85 days for the transradial group and 13.78 ± 3.15 days(P &lt; 0.05) for the transfemoral group. At the six-month follow-up, the rate of survival without cardiac event was 86.1% vs. 86.4% respectively in the transradial and transfemoral groups(P &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The transradial approach was as effective as the transfemoral approach, and there were fewer puncture point complications as well as a shorter span of hospitalization in the transradial group. PCI via the transradial approach is safe, effective and feasible in patients with AMI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nanjing Medical University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1007-4376(09)60068-X","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nanjing Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100743760960068X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of the transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI).

Methods

195 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly divided into two groups according to the different PCI operation pathways. 105 cases were assigned to the transfemoral artery group and 90 cases to the transradial artery group. We analyzed the data from the two groups, including the achievement ratio of paracentesis, cannulation time, the time from local anesthesia to the first time balloon inflation, the time of the total procedure, achievement ratio of PCI, incidence rate of vascular complications, total duration of hospitalization, and the six-month follow-up results in both groups.

Results

Our results showed that the achievement ratio of arteriopuncture, cannulation time and the time from local anesthesia to the first time balloon inflation in the transradial and transfemoral groups were 98.9% vs. 100%, 3.15 ± 1.56 min vs. 2.86 ± 0.97 min, and 18.56 ± 4.37 min vs. 17.75 ± 3.21 min, respectively. These differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. The total operating time was 29.75 ± 4.38 min for the transradial group and 27.89 ± 3.95 min(P < 0.05) for the transfemoral group. The operation achievement ratio in the transradial group was 96.7%, and 96.2% in the transfemoral group. The incidence of puncture point complications was 2.2% in the transradial group and 11.4% in the transfemoral group, and this difference was significant. The duration of hospitalization was 10.56 ± 2.85 days for the transradial group and 13.78 ± 3.15 days(P < 0.05) for the transfemoral group. At the six-month follow-up, the rate of survival without cardiac event was 86.1% vs. 86.4% respectively in the transradial and transfemoral groups(P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The transradial approach was as effective as the transfemoral approach, and there were fewer puncture point complications as well as a shorter span of hospitalization in the transradial group. PCI via the transradial approach is safe, effective and feasible in patients with AMI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性心肌梗死患者经桡动脉入路经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性和可行性
目的评价经桡动脉入路在急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中进行初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的疗效和可行性。方法将195例急性心肌梗死患者根据PCI手术路径的不同随机分为两组。经股动脉组105例,经桡动脉组90例。分析两组数据,包括穿刺成功率、插管时间、局麻至第一次球囊充气时间、总手术时间、PCI成成率、血管并发症发生率、总住院时间、6个月随访结果。结果经桡动脉组和经股动脉组动脉穿刺成功率为98.9%,插管时间为3.15±1.56 min,首次充气时间为2.86±0.97 min,局麻至首次充气时间为18.56±4.37 min, 17.75±3.21 min。两组间差异无统计学意义。经桡动脉组总手术时间为29.75±4.38 min, 27.89±3.95 min(P <经股组0.05)。经桡骨组手术成功率为96.7%,经股骨组为96.2%。经桡动脉组穿刺点并发症发生率为2.2%,经股动脉组为11.4%,差异有统计学意义。经桡动脉组住院时间为10.56±2.85天,13.78±3.15天(P <经股组0.05)。6个月随访时,经桡动脉组和经股动脉组无心脏事件生存率分别为86.1%和86.4% (P >0.05)。结论经桡骨入路与经股入路疗效相当,且穿刺点并发症少,住院时间短。经桡骨入路PCI治疗AMI患者安全、有效、可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of sevoflurane on left ventricular function by speckle-tracking echocardiography in coronary bypass patients: A randomized trial Phosphorylated protein chip combined with artificial intelligence tools for precise drug screening Upregulation of α-ENaC induces pancreatic β-cell dysfunction, ER stress, and SIRT2 degradation Irisin/BDNF signaling in the muscle-brain axis and circadian system: a review ELABELA protects against diabetic kidney disease by activating high glucose-inhibited renal tubular autophagy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1