Love and the Metaphysics of Being: Aquinas, Clarke, and Wojtyla

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2015-09-19 DOI:10.5840/QD20156128
R. M. H. Lemmons
{"title":"Love and the Metaphysics of Being: Aquinas, Clarke, and Wojtyla","authors":"R. M. H. Lemmons","doi":"10.5840/QD20156128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The metaphysics of Aquinas reconciles–for the most part1—a tension between W. Norris Clarke and Karol Wojtyla arising from Wojtyla’s claim that to exist fully requires ethical choices: one must freely choose to obey the law of the gift and find self-fulfillment in self-transcendence.2 Choosing self-transcendence enables the moral agent to actualize potentials and to achieve the fullness of existence. But since self-transcendence presupposes that one is relating to something or someone other than oneself, the ability to choose self-transcendence is the ability to choose to be relational. Such a choice seems to be at odds with Clarke’s identification of relationality as intrinsic to being: “being as substance, as existing in itself, naturally flows over into being as relational.... To be fully is to be substance-in-relation.”3 As such, being is necessarily diffusively good, receptive, and intrinsically self-communicative.4 In support of this, he cites Aquinas as stating that communication is the “very meaning (ratio) of actuality (SCG III, chap. 64).”5 He could have also","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":"71 1","pages":"58 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD20156128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The metaphysics of Aquinas reconciles–for the most part1—a tension between W. Norris Clarke and Karol Wojtyla arising from Wojtyla’s claim that to exist fully requires ethical choices: one must freely choose to obey the law of the gift and find self-fulfillment in self-transcendence.2 Choosing self-transcendence enables the moral agent to actualize potentials and to achieve the fullness of existence. But since self-transcendence presupposes that one is relating to something or someone other than oneself, the ability to choose self-transcendence is the ability to choose to be relational. Such a choice seems to be at odds with Clarke’s identification of relationality as intrinsic to being: “being as substance, as existing in itself, naturally flows over into being as relational.... To be fully is to be substance-in-relation.”3 As such, being is necessarily diffusively good, receptive, and intrinsically self-communicative.4 In support of this, he cites Aquinas as stating that communication is the “very meaning (ratio) of actuality (SCG III, chap. 64).”5 He could have also
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱与存在的形而上学:阿奎那、克拉克和沃伊蒂拉
阿奎那的形而上学在很大程度上调和了W.诺里斯·克拉克和卡罗尔·沃伊蒂拉之间的紧张关系,沃伊蒂拉声称要充分存在就需要道德选择:一个人必须自由地选择服从天赋法则,在自我超越中找到自我实现选择自我超越使道德主体得以实现潜能,实现存在的完满。但既然自我超越的前提是一个人与自己以外的人或事有关,那么选择自我超越的能力就是选择关系的能力。这样的选择似乎与克拉克认为关系是存在的内在特征的观点不一致:“作为实体的存在,作为自身存在,自然地流入作为关系的存在....。充实就是成为关系中的实体。因此,存在必然是传播的善、接受的善和内在的自我交流的善为了支持这一点,他引用了阿奎那的说法,即交流是“现实的真正意义(比率)”(SCG III,第64章)。他本来也可以的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quaestiones Disputatae
Quaestiones Disputatae HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Remnants of Substances: A Neo-Aristotelian Resolution of the Puzzles After Survivalism and Corruptionism: Separated Souls as Incomplete Persons Evaluating Hylomorphism as a Hybrid Account of Personal Identity Editor’s Introduction Saint Thomas Aquinas and the Too-Many-Thinkers Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1