Screen for Lysosomal Storage Diseases, Save More Nevada Babies

Pub Date : 2021-05-21 DOI:10.1080/01947648.2021.1914482
Kim Thu Nguyen, N. Nguyen, W. Havins
{"title":"Screen for Lysosomal Storage Diseases, Save More Nevada Babies","authors":"Kim Thu Nguyen, N. Nguyen, W. Havins","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2021.1914482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Screen for Lysosomal Storage Diseases, Save More Nevada Babies Kim Thu Nguyen, OMS-II, knguyen38@student.touro.edu, Nguyen Nguyen, OMS-II, nnguyen20@student.touro.edu Weldon Havins, MD, JD, LLM, FCLM, Professor Emeritus Touro University Nevada College of Osteopathic Medicine, Henderson, NV. Introduction In the US, the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) currently endorses 29 disorders for which newborns should be screened, given evidence of the benefits of early detection. With increasing knowledge of disease progression, new and improved treatment options, and development of efficient screening tests, the screening of newborns for lysosomal storage disorders (LSD) has been quickly gaining momentum in the last decade. In 2019, Nevada passed Senate Bill 291, mandating the screening of all conditions in the RUSP, including Pompe disease and mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPS I). Currently, improved screening technology can measure enzymatic activities for several LSDs in a single analysis, allowing for the conservation of labor, equipment, samples, and reagents. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of adding Fabry and Gaucher disease to Nevada’s newborn screening panel once screening for Pompe disease and MPS I has been established. Methods We performed a systematic review of literature to identify evidence on the natural history of Fabry and GD, as well as availability and effectiveness of treatment options and screening tests. We also compiled a list of costs associated with common clinical manifestations of Fabry and GD that commonly occur prior to diagnosis without an early detection program. We then compared these costs to the estimated costs of screening. Results We have estimated that the cost of adding on the screening of these two LSDs, once screening for Pompe and MPS I is established, will cost approximately $89,205 per year. The estimated costs of management of Fabry and GD in the absence of early detection and treatment are shown below: 2021 American College of Legal Medicine JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE 2021, VOL. 41, NO. S1, 29–30 https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2021.1914482","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2021.1914482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Screen for Lysosomal Storage Diseases, Save More Nevada Babies Kim Thu Nguyen, OMS-II, knguyen38@student.touro.edu, Nguyen Nguyen, OMS-II, nnguyen20@student.touro.edu Weldon Havins, MD, JD, LLM, FCLM, Professor Emeritus Touro University Nevada College of Osteopathic Medicine, Henderson, NV. Introduction In the US, the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) currently endorses 29 disorders for which newborns should be screened, given evidence of the benefits of early detection. With increasing knowledge of disease progression, new and improved treatment options, and development of efficient screening tests, the screening of newborns for lysosomal storage disorders (LSD) has been quickly gaining momentum in the last decade. In 2019, Nevada passed Senate Bill 291, mandating the screening of all conditions in the RUSP, including Pompe disease and mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPS I). Currently, improved screening technology can measure enzymatic activities for several LSDs in a single analysis, allowing for the conservation of labor, equipment, samples, and reagents. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of adding Fabry and Gaucher disease to Nevada’s newborn screening panel once screening for Pompe disease and MPS I has been established. Methods We performed a systematic review of literature to identify evidence on the natural history of Fabry and GD, as well as availability and effectiveness of treatment options and screening tests. We also compiled a list of costs associated with common clinical manifestations of Fabry and GD that commonly occur prior to diagnosis without an early detection program. We then compared these costs to the estimated costs of screening. Results We have estimated that the cost of adding on the screening of these two LSDs, once screening for Pompe and MPS I is established, will cost approximately $89,205 per year. The estimated costs of management of Fabry and GD in the absence of early detection and treatment are shown below: 2021 American College of Legal Medicine JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE 2021, VOL. 41, NO. S1, 29–30 https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2021.1914482
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
筛查溶酶体贮积性疾病,拯救更多内华达州婴儿
筛查溶酶体淤积性疾病,拯救更多内华达州婴儿Kim Thu Nguyen, OMS-II, knguyen38@student.touro.edu, Nguyen Nguyen, OMS-II, nnguyen20@student.touro.edu Weldon Havins, MD, JD, LLM, FCLM,内华达州亨德森Touro大学内华达骨科医学院名誉教授。介绍在美国,推荐统一筛查小组(RUSP)目前认可29种疾病,新生儿应该进行筛查,因为早期发现的证据是有益的。随着对疾病进展的认识不断增加,新的和改进的治疗方案,以及有效筛查试验的发展,在过去十年中,对新生儿进行溶酶体贮积症(LSD)筛查的势头迅速增强。2019年,内华达州通过了参议院第291号法案,要求对RUSP中的所有条件进行筛选,包括庞贝病和粘多糖病I (MPS I)。目前,改进的筛选技术可以在一次分析中测量几种lsd的酶活性,从而节省了劳动力、设备、样品和试剂。本研究的目的是评估在Pompe病和MPS I筛查建立后,将Fabry和Gaucher病加入内华达州新生儿筛查组的可行性和成本效益。方法我们进行了系统的文献综述,以确定法布里和GD的自然史证据,以及治疗方案和筛选试验的可用性和有效性。我们还编制了一份与Fabry和GD常见临床表现相关的费用清单,这些临床表现通常发生在诊断之前,没有早期检测程序。然后,我们将这些成本与筛查的估计成本进行了比较。我们估计,一旦建立了Pompe和MPS I的筛查,增加这两种lsd的筛查成本每年约为89,205美元。在没有早期发现和治疗的情况下,法布里和GD管理的估计费用如下所示:2021年美国法律医学学院法律医学杂志2021年,第41卷,NO。S1, 29-30 https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2021.1914482
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1