Content Validation of the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale–3rd Edition: Strength-Based Interview

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Pub Date : 2022-06-03 DOI:10.1177/10634266221099246
Corey D. Pierce, M. Epstein, Matthew D. Wood
{"title":"Content Validation of the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale–3rd Edition: Strength-Based Interview","authors":"Corey D. Pierce, M. Epstein, Matthew D. Wood","doi":"10.1177/10634266221099246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strength-based assessment has achieved acceptance from educational, mental health, and social service professionals as a means to measuring emotional and behavioral strengths of children. Several standardized, norm-referenced tests have been developed to assess these strengths; however, the primary mode of assessment is via informal interviews of parents and caregivers. In many cases, these interviews lack psychometric support, including basic validity and reliability. The purpose of this study was to document the multistep process used to establish the content validity of a newly developed instrument: Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Strength-Based Interview. Specifically, the results of a survey of 40 U.S. professional mental health staff and educators are described where respondents rated the importance of interview questions to the construct of strength-based assessment. The findings of the survey as well as the 18 items deemed most important are reported. Research limitations, future research, and implications for mental health and educational professionals are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders","volume":"9 1","pages":"184 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266221099246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strength-based assessment has achieved acceptance from educational, mental health, and social service professionals as a means to measuring emotional and behavioral strengths of children. Several standardized, norm-referenced tests have been developed to assess these strengths; however, the primary mode of assessment is via informal interviews of parents and caregivers. In many cases, these interviews lack psychometric support, including basic validity and reliability. The purpose of this study was to document the multistep process used to establish the content validity of a newly developed instrument: Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Strength-Based Interview. Specifically, the results of a survey of 40 U.S. professional mental health staff and educators are described where respondents rated the importance of interview questions to the construct of strength-based assessment. The findings of the survey as well as the 18 items deemed most important are reported. Research limitations, future research, and implications for mental health and educational professionals are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为与情绪评定量表的内容验证-第三版:基于力量的访谈
以力量为基础的评估已经被教育、心理健康和社会服务专业人员接受,作为衡量儿童情感和行为力量的一种手段。已经制定了若干标准参照测试来评估这些优势;然而,主要的评估模式是通过父母和照顾者的非正式访谈。在许多情况下,这些访谈缺乏心理测量的支持,包括基本的效度和信度。摘要本研究的目的是要记录一种新开发的工具:行为与情绪评量量表:基于力量的访谈的内容效度的建立过程。具体而言,对40名美国专业心理健康工作人员和教育工作者的调查结果进行了描述,其中受访者对面试问题的重要性进行了评级,以构建基于力量的评估。报告了调查结果以及被认为最重要的18个项目。讨论了研究的局限性、未来的研究以及对心理健康和教育专业人员的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders publishes quality scholarship related to individuals with emotional and behavioral disorders. Articles represent a wide range of disciplines, including counseling, education, early childhood care, juvenile corrections, mental health, psychiatry, psychology, public health, rehabilitation, social work, and special education. Articles on characteristics, assessment, prevention, intervention, treatment, legal or policy issues, and evaluation are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Specific Negative Outcomes of Bullying or Victimization Forms on Psychological Adjustment Preliminary Testing of Recognize. Relax. Record.: A Tier 2 Intervention for Elementary Students With Internalizing Behaviors Parent–Teacher Discrepancies About the Mental Health of Siblings of Children With Chronic Disorders: A Latent Profile Analysis Classroom Seating Placements of Students With or at Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Engagement Amid Adversity: Socioeconomic Influences on Educational Engagement in Supporting Preschoolers With Externalizing Behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1