A study on bone marrow derived stem cells and its application on ACL graft regeneration in partial ACL tears

Dr. R Aswin Sundar, D. Ak, D. A. Kumar, Dr. Abin Mahmood Nizar, Dr. Yeshwanth Subash
{"title":"A study on bone marrow derived stem cells and its application on ACL graft regeneration in partial ACL tears","authors":"Dr. R Aswin Sundar, D. Ak, D. A. Kumar, Dr. Abin Mahmood Nizar, Dr. Yeshwanth Subash","doi":"10.22271/ortho.2023.v9.i3d.3433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are frequent, and there is still considerable controversy surrounding their diagnosis, natural history and treatment. Aim: To examine patient-reported outcomes, physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of partial ACL tears treated with an intraarticular injection of BMAC and to evaluate both subjective and objective clinical results as to compare the outcomes Pre Procedure, at 3 weeks and 3 months following the procedure, as well as functional recovery time. Methods: From April to July 2023, consecutive patients from a single institution with partial ACL tears treated nonoperatively were prospectively evaluated. Partial tears were defined as a positive Lachman test with clear endpoint, a negative pivot-shift and MRI were taken and were classified and graded on the basis of VAN MEER Radiological Classification. Patients were treated with one intraarticular injection of BMAC and specific physical therapy protocol. Prospective analyzed data included physical examination and Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were taken Pre Procedure, at 3 weeks and 3 months. Baseline MRI findings and at 3 months follow-up were reviewed. Failure was defined as those patients with clinical instability at follow-up that required ACL reconstruction at 3 months. Results: A total of 30 patients where included, all 30 treated with BMAC injection with a mean follow-up of 3 months. Their Mean Age was 40. 20 (60%) of them were men and 40 % of them were females, Overall failure rate was (n = 3). One patient (5.0%) was unable to RTS due to subjective instability. The other 95.0% in each group were able to return to their previous sports level. Regarding objective stability, at 6 month follow-up in group 1, 19 presented a decrease in the side-to-side difference, 10 remained with the same difference, and 1 had 2 mm more, over all, mean RTS time was 3 months. Significant differences were observed regarding subjective outcomes, return to sport Following Procedure. MRI findings revealed an improvement in the ACL signal in half of the patients. However, we did not find a significant relationship between MRI findings and clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Overall, 95.0% of patients returned to sports at a mean follow-up of 3 mo. Mean time to return to sports was 3 months. The addition of BMAC shows promise in the treatment of grade 1, 2, and possibly grade 3 ACL tears without retraction. Further investigation using a controlled study design is warranted.","PeriodicalId":14302,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2023.v9.i3d.3433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are frequent, and there is still considerable controversy surrounding their diagnosis, natural history and treatment. Aim: To examine patient-reported outcomes, physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of partial ACL tears treated with an intraarticular injection of BMAC and to evaluate both subjective and objective clinical results as to compare the outcomes Pre Procedure, at 3 weeks and 3 months following the procedure, as well as functional recovery time. Methods: From April to July 2023, consecutive patients from a single institution with partial ACL tears treated nonoperatively were prospectively evaluated. Partial tears were defined as a positive Lachman test with clear endpoint, a negative pivot-shift and MRI were taken and were classified and graded on the basis of VAN MEER Radiological Classification. Patients were treated with one intraarticular injection of BMAC and specific physical therapy protocol. Prospective analyzed data included physical examination and Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were taken Pre Procedure, at 3 weeks and 3 months. Baseline MRI findings and at 3 months follow-up were reviewed. Failure was defined as those patients with clinical instability at follow-up that required ACL reconstruction at 3 months. Results: A total of 30 patients where included, all 30 treated with BMAC injection with a mean follow-up of 3 months. Their Mean Age was 40. 20 (60%) of them were men and 40 % of them were females, Overall failure rate was (n = 3). One patient (5.0%) was unable to RTS due to subjective instability. The other 95.0% in each group were able to return to their previous sports level. Regarding objective stability, at 6 month follow-up in group 1, 19 presented a decrease in the side-to-side difference, 10 remained with the same difference, and 1 had 2 mm more, over all, mean RTS time was 3 months. Significant differences were observed regarding subjective outcomes, return to sport Following Procedure. MRI findings revealed an improvement in the ACL signal in half of the patients. However, we did not find a significant relationship between MRI findings and clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Overall, 95.0% of patients returned to sports at a mean follow-up of 3 mo. Mean time to return to sports was 3 months. The addition of BMAC shows promise in the treatment of grade 1, 2, and possibly grade 3 ACL tears without retraction. Further investigation using a controlled study design is warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨髓源性干细胞在部分前交叉韧带撕裂移植再生中的应用研究
背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)的部分撕裂是常见的,其诊断、自然病史和治疗仍有相当大的争议。目的:检查关节内注射BMAC治疗部分ACL撕裂的患者报告的结果、体格检查和磁共振成像(MRI)结果,并评估主观和客观的临床结果,以比较手术前、手术后3周和3个月的结果,以及功能恢复时间。方法:从2023年4月至7月,对来自同一机构的非手术治疗的部分前交叉韧带撕裂患者进行前瞻性评估。将部分撕裂定义为拉赫曼试验阳性,终点明确,轴移阴性,并进行MRI检查,并根据VAN MEER放射学分级进行分类和分级。患者接受一次关节内注射BMAC和特定的物理治疗方案。前瞻性分析数据包括术前3周和3个月的体格检查、Lysholm和国际膝关节文献委员会评分。回顾了基线MRI表现和3个月的随访。失败定义为随访时临床不稳定的患者在3个月时需要重建ACL。结果:共纳入30例患者,均接受BMAC注射治疗,平均随访3个月。他们的平均年龄是40岁。其中男性20例(60%),女性40%,总失败率为(n = 3)。1例(5.0%)患者因主观不稳定而无法进行RTS。其余95.0%的人都能恢复到以前的运动水平。在客观稳定性方面,第1组随访6个月时,19例患者侧侧差异减小,10例患者侧侧差异保持不变,1例患者侧侧差异增大2mm,总体而言,平均RTS时间为3个月。在主观结果、术后恢复运动方面观察到显著差异。MRI结果显示半数患者前交叉韧带信号改善。然而,我们没有发现MRI表现与临床结果之间的显著关系。结论:总体而言,95.0%的患者在平均随访3个月后恢复运动,平均恢复运动时间为3个月。BMAC的加入在治疗1级、2级和可能的3级前交叉韧带撕裂中显示出希望。采用对照研究设计的进一步调查是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology and treatment of Ahlback stage III to V knee osteoarthritis by total knee prostheses at Owendo University teaching hospital: About 60 cases Using subchondral one third tubular plate as a rafting plate for elevation of depressed tibial plateau fractures Functional outcome of spaghetti wrist following surgery- our experience in 26 patients Evaluation of the outcome of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures treated with locking plate fixation: An observational study Effectiveness of corticosteroid injection in the treatment of De Quervain`s stenosing tenosynovitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1