„Us” and „them” in the language of conservative islamophobia - referential and predicational strategies in Polish right-wing press discourse on the migration crisis in 2015

Adam C. Konopka
{"title":"„Us” and „them” in the language of conservative islamophobia - referential and predicational strategies in Polish right-wing press discourse on the migration crisis in 2015","authors":"Adam C. Konopka","doi":"10.7494/human.2019.18.1.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As Vincent Geisser noted in his book, La Nouvelle Islamophobie, islamophobia can be defi ned as a form of cultural racism which puts emphasis especially on religion (Islam) as the agent of distinction between ‘Us’ and ‘Them’, based usually on a phantasmatic idea of Islam and Muslims. The islamophobic phenomenon increased radically in Poland during the peak of the migration crisis in the second half of 2015, following numerous press articles and columns which provide a background for such prejudice. The right-wing press titles provided space for authors voicing discriminative opinions about (mostly Muslim) refugees and immigrants from the Middle East and Northern Africa. Using a Discourse-Historical Approach (Wodak, Reisigl), the author analysed which predicational and referential strategies are used to designate social actors and where the line of distinction is drawn between the categories of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in right-wing press discourse on the migration crisis. The analysis suggests that right-wing publicists distinguish two diff erent subcategories of ‘Them’: a) refugees and immigrants (usually Muslim) and b) the liberal political and media elites. Therefore, the analysed texts could be perceived as examples of ‘conservative islamophobia’, as defi ned by Monika Bobako, in which European Christian identity is the basis for prejudice against Muslims and liberal advocates of multi-culturalism.","PeriodicalId":30309,"journal":{"name":"Studia Humanistyczne AGH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Humanistyczne AGH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7494/human.2019.18.1.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As Vincent Geisser noted in his book, La Nouvelle Islamophobie, islamophobia can be defi ned as a form of cultural racism which puts emphasis especially on religion (Islam) as the agent of distinction between ‘Us’ and ‘Them’, based usually on a phantasmatic idea of Islam and Muslims. The islamophobic phenomenon increased radically in Poland during the peak of the migration crisis in the second half of 2015, following numerous press articles and columns which provide a background for such prejudice. The right-wing press titles provided space for authors voicing discriminative opinions about (mostly Muslim) refugees and immigrants from the Middle East and Northern Africa. Using a Discourse-Historical Approach (Wodak, Reisigl), the author analysed which predicational and referential strategies are used to designate social actors and where the line of distinction is drawn between the categories of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in right-wing press discourse on the migration crisis. The analysis suggests that right-wing publicists distinguish two diff erent subcategories of ‘Them’: a) refugees and immigrants (usually Muslim) and b) the liberal political and media elites. Therefore, the analysed texts could be perceived as examples of ‘conservative islamophobia’, as defi ned by Monika Bobako, in which European Christian identity is the basis for prejudice against Muslims and liberal advocates of multi-culturalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保守的伊斯兰恐惧症语言中的“我们”和“他们”——2015年波兰右翼媒体关于移民危机的话语中的参照和预测策略
正如Vincent Geisser在他的书《新伊斯兰恐惧症》中指出的那样,伊斯兰恐惧症可以被定义为一种文化种族主义,它特别强调宗教(伊斯兰教)作为区分“我们”和“他们”的媒介,通常基于对伊斯兰教和穆斯林的幻想。在2015年下半年的移民危机高峰期间,波兰的伊斯兰恐惧症现象急剧增加,此前有许多新闻文章和专栏为这种偏见提供了背景。右翼报刊的标题为作者提供了空间,他们对来自中东和北非的难民和移民(主要是穆斯林)发表了歧视性的观点。使用话语历史方法(Wodak, Reisigl),作者分析了哪些预测和参考策略被用来指定社会行动者,以及在右翼媒体关于移民危机的话语中,“我们”和“他们”类别之间的区别在哪里。分析表明,右翼公关人员将“他们”分为两个不同的子类别:a)难民和移民(通常是穆斯林);b)自由派政治和媒体精英。因此,正如Monika Bobako所定义的那样,分析的文本可以被视为“保守的伊斯兰恐惧症”的例子,其中欧洲基督徒身份是对穆斯林和多元文化主义自由倡导者偏见的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Zr�wnowa�one konsumowanie czasu wolnego. O przemianach leisure time w spo�ecze�stwie konsumpcyjnym Od �czasu wolnego� do �czasu niewolnego�? Dylematy spo�ecze�stwa osi�gni�� Problematyczne u�ytkowanie Internetu w czasie wolnym przez m�odzie� w perspektywie psychologii uzale�nie� Czas wolny - o codziennych i niecodziennych scenariuszach do�wiadczania Pu�apka czy dobrodziejstwo immersyjno�ci w bieganiu d�ugodystansowym? Czas wolny aktywnie wype�niany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1