Law-making crowdsourcing and its significance for establishing the limits of legal regulation

E. Zaitseva
{"title":"Law-making crowdsourcing and its significance for establishing the limits of legal regulation","authors":"E. Zaitseva","doi":"10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-36-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: the digitalisation of the processes of modern life contributes to the emergence of new lawmaking technologies aimed at defining the scope of legal regulation and establishing its limits. The use of crowdsourcing in law-making activities makes it possible to correlate the positions of society and the state \nregarding the possibility and necessity of regulating certain social relations. \nThe purpose of the study: to reveal the essence of law-making crowdsourcing as an independent lawmaking technology, to determine its significance for establishing the limits of legal regulation. \nResearch methods: general scientific methods and methods of cognition (systemic, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, generalisation, comparison, etc.) and special scientific methods (formal legal, comparative legal). \nResults: Law-making crowdsourcing is a new technology and one of the deliberative procedures aimed at optimising the establishment of the scope of legal regulation and fixing it as a subject of legal regulation. There are three main types of law-making crowdsourcing, depending on the objectives and content pursued: crowdsourcing of issues, crowdsourcing of ideas, and crowdsourcing of draft legislation. Certain conditions need to be taken into account in order for crowdsourcing to produce the desired results and improve the effectiveness of legal regulation, as well as problems and shortcomings due to both the specificity of the technology and peculiarities of the public consciousness.","PeriodicalId":43418,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik St Petersburg University-Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik St Petersburg University-Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-36-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: the digitalisation of the processes of modern life contributes to the emergence of new lawmaking technologies aimed at defining the scope of legal regulation and establishing its limits. The use of crowdsourcing in law-making activities makes it possible to correlate the positions of society and the state regarding the possibility and necessity of regulating certain social relations. The purpose of the study: to reveal the essence of law-making crowdsourcing as an independent lawmaking technology, to determine its significance for establishing the limits of legal regulation. Research methods: general scientific methods and methods of cognition (systemic, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, generalisation, comparison, etc.) and special scientific methods (formal legal, comparative legal). Results: Law-making crowdsourcing is a new technology and one of the deliberative procedures aimed at optimising the establishment of the scope of legal regulation and fixing it as a subject of legal regulation. There are three main types of law-making crowdsourcing, depending on the objectives and content pursued: crowdsourcing of issues, crowdsourcing of ideas, and crowdsourcing of draft legislation. Certain conditions need to be taken into account in order for crowdsourcing to produce the desired results and improve the effectiveness of legal regulation, as well as problems and shortcomings due to both the specificity of the technology and peculiarities of the public consciousness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立法众包及其对确立法律规制界限的意义
摘要:现代生活过程的数字化促进了新的立法技术的出现,旨在界定法律监管的范围并确立其限制。在立法活动中使用众包,可以将社会和国家在调节某些社会关系的可能性和必要性方面的立场联系起来。研究目的:揭示众包立法作为一种独立立法技术的本质,确定其对于确立法律规制界限的意义。研究方法:一般科学方法和认知方法(系统、分析、综合、归纳、演绎、概括、比较等)和特殊科学方法(形式法学、比较法学)。结果:立法众包是一种新技术,也是一种旨在优化法律规制范围的确立,使其成为法律规制主体的审议程序之一。根据所追求的目标和内容,众包立法主要有三种类型:问题众包、思想众包和立法草案众包。众包要想达到预期的效果,提高法律规制的有效性,需要考虑一定的条件,也需要考虑由于技术的特殊性和公众意识的特殊性而存在的问题和不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Vestnik St. Petersburg University, Mathematics  is a journal that publishes original contributions in all areas of fundamental and applied mathematics. It is the prime outlet for the findings of scientists from the Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics of St. Petersburg State University. Articles of the journal cover the major areas of fundamental and applied mathematics. The following are the main subject headings: Mathematical Analysis; Higher Algebra and Numbers Theory; Higher Geometry; Differential Equations; Mathematical Physics; Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis; Statistical Simulation; Theoretical Cybernetics; Game Theory; Operations Research; Theory of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, and Mathematical Problems of Mechanics and Astronomy.
期刊最新文献
Solution of the Local-Boundary-Value Problem of Control for a Nonlinear Stationary System Taking into Account Computer System Verification On the Approximation of the Attraction Field of a Rigid Body by the Attraction Field of Four Material Points of the Same Mass Rigid-Body Dynamics from the Euler Equations to the Attitude Control of Spacecraft in the Works of Scientists from St. Petersburg State University. Part 2 Regression Models for Calculating State-to-State Coefficients of the Rate of Vibrational Energy Exchanges Astronomical Research at the Mathematics Faculty of St. Petersburg University, I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1