食品安全——事件觀、系統觀

莊秀文, 林怡淑
{"title":"食品安全——事件觀、系統觀","authors":"莊秀文, 林怡淑","doi":"10.6288/TJPH201534104046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: There have been a large number of letters to media editors to advocate readers' thoughts on food safety because of recent food industry scandals. Yet, no systematic analysis for these letters has been reported. We conducted a systemic analysis for these opinions and proposed the concept of food safety. Methods: We screened 4 major newspapers in Taiwan for all letters to the editors, about the food safety scandals, published in the media in September and October 2014. These opinions were summarized thematically based on the contents, followed by developing a model food safety management system based on systemic theory model. Results: We identified 519 readers’ letters from the media. Most of the letters provided one-sided viewpoints fragmentally focusing on the direct causes relating to food safety events. Approximate 77% of readers thought the problem of food safety was associated with the gaps of government supervision and administration, followed by the trust in the food industries (12.6%). However, lacking of an integrative thinking to elaborate the systemic causes of the food scandal events was indicated. These opinions suggested especially an inadequate consumer culture, i.e. unreasonable propensity to food products inherent in consumers, which was not coherent with the business philosophy of food industry corporations. Conclusions: Food safety relies on the cooperation and collaboration among all stakeholders in the food production, marketing and consumption chain rather than independent efforts of individuals. The government has to refine their functions and capacities to supervise the food industries to ensure safe food operation. In addition, the food industries and consumers need to take a further step shifting narrow viewpoints of issues to integrate their thought into deliberate systems toward a safe operation in food supply chains.","PeriodicalId":34895,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Public Health","volume":"43 1","pages":"548-556"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH201534104046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: There have been a large number of letters to media editors to advocate readers' thoughts on food safety because of recent food industry scandals. Yet, no systematic analysis for these letters has been reported. We conducted a systemic analysis for these opinions and proposed the concept of food safety. Methods: We screened 4 major newspapers in Taiwan for all letters to the editors, about the food safety scandals, published in the media in September and October 2014. These opinions were summarized thematically based on the contents, followed by developing a model food safety management system based on systemic theory model. Results: We identified 519 readers’ letters from the media. Most of the letters provided one-sided viewpoints fragmentally focusing on the direct causes relating to food safety events. Approximate 77% of readers thought the problem of food safety was associated with the gaps of government supervision and administration, followed by the trust in the food industries (12.6%). However, lacking of an integrative thinking to elaborate the systemic causes of the food scandal events was indicated. These opinions suggested especially an inadequate consumer culture, i.e. unreasonable propensity to food products inherent in consumers, which was not coherent with the business philosophy of food industry corporations. Conclusions: Food safety relies on the cooperation and collaboration among all stakeholders in the food production, marketing and consumption chain rather than independent efforts of individuals. The government has to refine their functions and capacities to supervise the food industries to ensure safe food operation. In addition, the food industries and consumers need to take a further step shifting narrow viewpoints of issues to integrate their thought into deliberate systems toward a safe operation in food supply chains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食品安全——事件观、系统观
目的:由于最近的食品行业丑闻,有大量的信件给媒体编辑,倡导读者对食品安全的看法。然而,没有对这些信件进行系统分析的报道。我们对这些意见进行了系统的分析,提出了食品安全的概念。方法:筛选台湾4家主要报纸2014年9月和10月发表的有关食品安全丑闻的所有致编辑信。在此基础上,以系统理论模型为基础,构建了食品安全管理体系模型。结果:共识别出519封来自媒体的读者来信。大多数信件提供了片面的观点,零散地关注与食品安全事件有关的直接原因。大约77%的读者认为食品安全问题与政府监督管理的漏洞有关,其次是对食品行业的信任(12.6%)。然而,缺乏一种综合的思维来阐述食品丑闻事件的系统性原因。这些意见特别表明消费者文化的不足,即消费者固有的不合理的食品倾向,这与食品工业公司的经营理念不一致。结论:食品安全依赖于食品生产、销售和消费链中所有利益相关者的合作与协作,而不是个人的独立努力。政府要完善食品行业监管职能和能力,确保食品安全运行。此外,食品行业和消费者需要采取进一步措施,改变对问题的狭隘观点,将他们的思想整合到食品供应链安全运行的深思熟虑的系统中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Taiwan Journal of Public Health
Taiwan Journal of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationships between physical activity, age, and self-rated physical and psychological health in community-dwelling adults Trends of anxiety and performance of preventive measures among Taiwanese citizens during COVID-19 pandemic Using focus group interviews to investigate the willingness of medical personnel to voluntarily participate in COVID-19 group tasks in a one government quarantine facility in north Taiwan Incidence, prevalence and mortality of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Taiwan Prevalence, measures, and types of daily sedentary behavior among adolescents: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1