Gerrymandering the States: Partisanship, Race, and the Transformation of American Federalism

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics Pub Date : 2022-06-29 DOI:10.1017/rep.2021.44
Isaac Pollert
{"title":"Gerrymandering the States: Partisanship, Race, and the Transformation of American Federalism","authors":"Isaac Pollert","doi":"10.1017/rep.2021.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In addition to this, the Republican Party has used their manufactured advantage to forward policy that increases the cost of voting and diverts money away from public health initiatives, including COVID-19 preparedness. The authors conclude that the inter-relatedness of American politics, contrary to Justice Scalia’s assertion that gerrymandering’s effects are limited to the district in which they occur, means that gerrymandering is everyone’s problem. The authors relay this assault on the foundation of modern democracy with the gravity it deserves, explaining how, when, and why contemporary redistricting has eroded our democratic institutions and the public’s faith in them.","PeriodicalId":37190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics","volume":"60 1","pages":"593 - 595"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2021.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In addition to this, the Republican Party has used their manufactured advantage to forward policy that increases the cost of voting and diverts money away from public health initiatives, including COVID-19 preparedness. The authors conclude that the inter-relatedness of American politics, contrary to Justice Scalia’s assertion that gerrymandering’s effects are limited to the district in which they occur, means that gerrymandering is everyone’s problem. The authors relay this assault on the foundation of modern democracy with the gravity it deserves, explaining how, when, and why contemporary redistricting has eroded our democratic institutions and the public’s faith in them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不公正地划分各州:党派、种族和美国联邦制的转变
除此之外,共和党还利用他们制造的优势提出了增加投票成本的政策,并从包括COVID-19准备在内的公共卫生计划中转移了资金。作者得出的结论是,美国政治的相互关联性,与斯卡利亚大法官的断言相反,即不公正地划分选区的影响仅限于其发生的地区,意味着不公正地划分选区是每个人的问题。两位作者以其应有的严肃态度对现代民主的基础进行了攻击,解释了当代重新划分选区是如何、何时以及为什么侵蚀了我们的民主制度和公众对它们的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics
Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Responsiveness to Coethnics and Cominorities: Evidence from an Audit Experiment of State Legislators Introduction to the Final 2023 Issue The Advantage of Disadvantage: Costly Protest and Legislative Responsiveness By LaGina Gause, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022 Counting the State: State Resistance and Federal Enumeration of Latinos 1930–1970 Anger, Fear, and the Racialization of News Media Coverage of Protest Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1