Operator effects in the choice of certainty factor algebras: an experimental study

C. Holsapple, W. Rayens, Jen-Her Wu
{"title":"Operator effects in the choice of certainty factor algebras: an experimental study","authors":"C. Holsapple, W. Rayens, Jen-Her Wu","doi":"10.1006/KNAC.1993.1014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One aspect of knowledge acquisition involves reaching an understanding of how an expert combines certainties in the course of reasoning. There are several distinct junctures in an inference process where certainties need to be combined. At the most elemental level, these include combining certainties of operands involved in the arithmetic, logical and relational expressions that can constitute a premise. As a basic frame of reference for acquiring knowledge about certainty treatments, there is a prescriptive mapping of operators into the joint and confirmative classes of certainty factor algebras. However, these prescriptions have not been empirically studied. Here, we report on an experiment conducted to test various hypotheses about actual behaviors of people in combining certainties for elemental operators. For each operator, we found behaviors to be consistent with prescriptions in some respects, but deviating from them in other respects. The result is an empirical base from which to launch efforts involving the acquisition of knowledge about how specific experts combine certainties at various junctures in inference processes.","PeriodicalId":100857,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Acquisition","volume":"42 4 1","pages":"385-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1006/KNAC.1993.1014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract One aspect of knowledge acquisition involves reaching an understanding of how an expert combines certainties in the course of reasoning. There are several distinct junctures in an inference process where certainties need to be combined. At the most elemental level, these include combining certainties of operands involved in the arithmetic, logical and relational expressions that can constitute a premise. As a basic frame of reference for acquiring knowledge about certainty treatments, there is a prescriptive mapping of operators into the joint and confirmative classes of certainty factor algebras. However, these prescriptions have not been empirically studied. Here, we report on an experiment conducted to test various hypotheses about actual behaviors of people in combining certainties for elemental operators. For each operator, we found behaviors to be consistent with prescriptions in some respects, but deviating from them in other respects. The result is an empirical base from which to launch efforts involving the acquisition of knowledge about how specific experts combine certainties at various junctures in inference processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定性因子代数选择中的算子效应:实验研究
知识获取的一个方面包括理解专家如何在推理过程中结合确定性。在推理过程中,有几个不同的节点需要将确定性结合起来。在最基本的层面上,这些包括组合算术、逻辑和关系表达式中涉及的操作数的确定性,这些表达式可以构成一个前提。作为获取确定性处理知识的基本参考框架,存在着确定性因子代数的联合和确认类的算子的规定性映射。然而,这些处方还没有经过实证研究。在这里,我们报告了一项实验,该实验旨在测试人们在结合元素算子的确定性时实际行为的各种假设。对于每个操作员,我们发现行为在某些方面与处方一致,但在其他方面偏离处方。结果是一个经验基础,从这个基础上,我们可以开始努力获取关于特定专家如何在推理过程的不同时刻结合确定性的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The semantics of KBSSF, a language for KBS design Foundations for a methodology for medical KBS development What online machine learning can do for knowledge acquisition—a case study Apology and correction Configuring problem-solving methods: a CAKE perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1