Financial Inclusion of Rural and Urban Households and the Dodd-Frank Act

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.5539/ijef.v14n11p90
Kumuditha D Hikkaduwa Epa Liyanage, Denis Nadolnyak, Valentina Hartarska
{"title":"Financial Inclusion of Rural and Urban Households and the Dodd-Frank Act","authors":"Kumuditha D Hikkaduwa Epa Liyanage, Denis Nadolnyak, Valentina Hartarska","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v14n11p90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the consequences of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 on financial inclusion in rural areas. The Act imposed changes in the U.S. banking industry that contributed to closures or consolidation of smaller community banks, mostly in the rural areas, that could not sustain the higher regulatory burden. We evaluate whether the Act had differential impacts on the financial inclusion of rural and urban unbanked households. Financial inclusion is measured by the utilization of banking services such as checking or savings account and by relying less on Alternative Financial Services (AFS). We employ the Changes-in-Changes quantile model to establish if rural unbanked households were more affected relative to their urban counterparts and provide robustness checks through ordered and binomial logistic regressions. We analyze both the short- and the long-term impacts of the Act using household-level data from the FDIC National Surveys of Unbanked and Underbanked Households. Results indicate that rural unbanked households on average were more likely to plan to open a bank account shortly after 2010 but the magnitude of the effect decreased in long-term. The rural unbanked households did not use more AFS services for credit and transaction purposes than urban households in the short term. However, in the long term, they increased their use of AFS for credit relative to their urban counterparts, likely because they were less able to obtain credit from banks. The policy implications point at the need to promote technologies that may help close the rural-urban financial inclusion gap and indentify a potential for combination of Fintech and banking services provision.","PeriodicalId":37166,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v14n11p90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the consequences of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 on financial inclusion in rural areas. The Act imposed changes in the U.S. banking industry that contributed to closures or consolidation of smaller community banks, mostly in the rural areas, that could not sustain the higher regulatory burden. We evaluate whether the Act had differential impacts on the financial inclusion of rural and urban unbanked households. Financial inclusion is measured by the utilization of banking services such as checking or savings account and by relying less on Alternative Financial Services (AFS). We employ the Changes-in-Changes quantile model to establish if rural unbanked households were more affected relative to their urban counterparts and provide robustness checks through ordered and binomial logistic regressions. We analyze both the short- and the long-term impacts of the Act using household-level data from the FDIC National Surveys of Unbanked and Underbanked Households. Results indicate that rural unbanked households on average were more likely to plan to open a bank account shortly after 2010 but the magnitude of the effect decreased in long-term. The rural unbanked households did not use more AFS services for credit and transaction purposes than urban households in the short term. However, in the long term, they increased their use of AFS for credit relative to their urban counterparts, likely because they were less able to obtain credit from banks. The policy implications point at the need to promote technologies that may help close the rural-urban financial inclusion gap and indentify a potential for combination of Fintech and banking services provision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城乡家庭普惠金融和多德-弗兰克法案
本文考察了2010年《多德-弗兰克华尔街改革与消费者保护法》对农村地区普惠金融的影响。该法案对美国银行业进行了改革,导致无法承受更高监管负担的小型社区银行关闭或合并,这些银行大多位于农村地区。我们评估了该法案是否对农村和城市无银行家庭的金融包容性产生了不同的影响。金融包容性是通过使用支票或储蓄账户等银行服务以及减少对替代金融服务(AFS)的依赖来衡量的。我们采用变化中的变化分位数模型来确定农村无银行账户家庭是否比城市无银行账户家庭受影响更大,并通过有序和二项逻辑回归提供鲁棒性检验。我们使用来自FDIC全国无银行账户和银行服务不足家庭调查的家庭层面数据来分析该法案的短期和长期影响。结果表明,2010年后,农村无银行账户家庭平均更有可能计划在短期内开设银行账户,但从长期来看,其影响程度有所下降。在短期内,农村无银行家庭使用AFS服务进行信贷和交易的次数并不比城市家庭多。然而,从长期来看,相对于城市的同行,他们增加了对AFS的使用,可能是因为他们从银行获得信贷的能力较差。政策影响表明,需要推广有助于缩小城乡普惠金融差距的技术,并确定金融科技与银行服务提供相结合的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies
International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Payment Market and Pricing: A Bibliometric Review Why is Technological Innovation Locally Concentrated? A Theoretical Review Present Bias and Quality Reduction on Daily Deal Platforms Capital Structure and Macroeconomic Determinants in Emerging Country: A Panel Quantile Regression Approach Fiscal Pedal: Fraud or Creative Accounting? A Theoretical Understanding of the Dangerous Fiscal Cycles that Affected the Brazilian Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1